BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of CT perfusion (CTP) for the detection of ischemic stroke by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library using the terms 'perfusion computed tomography', 'ischemic stroke' and synonyms. We included studies that: (1) reported original data, (2) studied the diagnostic value of CTP for detecting ischemic stroke, (3) used MRI-DWI, follow-up MRI or follow-up CT as the reference standard, (4) included at least 10 patients who were suspected of ischemic stroke, and (5) reported the number of true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives for the diagnosis of ischemic stroke. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were finally included in the current review with a total of 1,107 patients. A pooled analysis resulted in a sensitivity of 80% (95% confidence interval, CI: 72-86%) and a specificity of 95% (95% CI: 86-98%). Almost two thirds of the false negatives were due to small lacunar infarcts; the remaining false negatives were mostly due to limited coverage. CONCLUSIONS: The current systematic review shows that CTP has a high sensitivity and a very high specificity for detecting infarcts.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of CT perfusion (CTP) for the detection of ischemic stroke by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library using the terms 'perfusion computed tomography', 'ischemic stroke' and synonyms. We included studies that: (1) reported original data, (2) studied the diagnostic value of CTP for detecting ischemic stroke, (3) used MRI-DWI, follow-up MRI or follow-up CT as the reference standard, (4) included at least 10 patients who were suspected of ischemic stroke, and (5) reported the number of true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives for the diagnosis of ischemic stroke. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were finally included in the current review with a total of 1,107 patients. A pooled analysis resulted in a sensitivity of 80% (95% confidence interval, CI: 72-86%) and a specificity of 95% (95% CI: 86-98%). Almost two thirds of the false negatives were due to small lacunar infarcts; the remaining false negatives were mostly due to limited coverage. CONCLUSIONS: The current systematic review shows that CTP has a high sensitivity and a very high specificity for detecting infarcts.
Authors: Fahmi Fahmi; Henk A Marquering; Jordi Borst; Geert J Streekstra; Ludo F M Beenen; Joris M Niesten; Birgitta K Velthuis; Charles B L Majoie; Ed vanBavel Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: J C Benson; S Payabvash; S Mortazavi; L Zhang; P Salazar; B Hoffman; M Oswood; A M McKinney Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: S Rudilosso; X Urra; L San Román; C Laredo; A López-Rueda; S Amaro; L Oleaga; Á Chamorro Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Christine Bollwein; Annika Plate; Wieland H Sommer; Kolja M Thierfelder; Hendrik Janssen; Maximilian F Reiser; Andreas Straube; Louisa von Baumgarten Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Rujimas Khumtong; Timo Krings; Vitor M Pereira; Aleksandra Pikula; Joanna D Schaafsma Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2020-01-04 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: B J Emmer; M Rijkee; J M Niesten; M J H Wermer; B K Velthuis; M A A van Walderveen Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 2.804