BACKGROUND:Central blood pressure (BP) is considered a better predictor of cardiovascular events than brachial BP. Modifications of central, beyond brachial BP, can be assessed by pressure amplification, a potential new cardiovascular risk factor. Comparison between drugs' effect on central hemodynamics has been poorly studied. Our aim was to assess the hemodynamic effect of a 12-week treatment with amlodipine 5mg, or candesartan 8mg, or indapamide sustained-release 1.5mg, in comparison with placebo. METHODS: We analyzed 145 out-patients with essential hypertension in primary prevention enrolled in theNatrilix SR Versus Candesartan and Amlodipine in the Reduction of Systolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients (X-CELLENT) study, a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Arterial stiffness, central BP, pressure amplification, and wave reflection were measured by applanation tonometry. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients were homogeneous between groups. After treatment, we found that active drugs produced similar reduction of both central and peripheral BPs, with no significant interdrug differences (all P < 0.05; excluded peripheral pulse pressure, compared with placebo). Second, amlodipine (1.9% ± 15.3%), candesartan (3.0% ± 14.6%) and indapamide (4.1% ± 14.4%) all increased pulse pressure amplification, but only indapamide was statistically different from placebo (P = 0.02). Finally, no significant changes were observed on pulse wave velocity, heart rate, and augmentation index. CONCLUSIONS: The 3 antihypertensive drugs similarly reduced peripheral and central BP, as compared with placebo, but a significant increase in pulse pressure amplification was obtained only with indapamide, independently of arterial stiffness modifications. REGISTRATION NUMBER: 3283161 by BIOPHARMA.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Central blood pressure (BP) is considered a better predictor of cardiovascular events than brachial BP. Modifications of central, beyond brachial BP, can be assessed by pressure amplification, a potential new cardiovascular risk factor. Comparison between drugs' effect on central hemodynamics has been poorly studied. Our aim was to assess the hemodynamic effect of a 12-week treatment with amlodipine 5mg, or candesartan 8mg, or indapamide sustained-release 1.5mg, in comparison with placebo. METHODS: We analyzed 145 out-patients with essential hypertension in primary prevention enrolled in the Natrilix SR Versus Candesartan and Amlodipine in the Reduction of Systolic Blood Pressure in HypertensivePatients (X-CELLENT) study, a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Arterial stiffness, central BP, pressure amplification, and wave reflection were measured by applanation tonometry. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients were homogeneous between groups. After treatment, we found that active drugs produced similar reduction of both central and peripheral BPs, with no significant interdrug differences (all P < 0.05; excluded peripheral pulse pressure, compared with placebo). Second, amlodipine (1.9% ± 15.3%), candesartan (3.0% ± 14.6%) and indapamide (4.1% ± 14.4%) all increased pulse pressure amplification, but only indapamide was statistically different from placebo (P = 0.02). Finally, no significant changes were observed on pulse wave velocity, heart rate, and augmentation index. CONCLUSIONS: The 3 antihypertensive drugs similarly reduced peripheral and central BP, as compared with placebo, but a significant increase in pulse pressure amplification was obtained only with indapamide, independently of arterial stiffness modifications. REGISTRATION NUMBER: 3283161 by BIOPHARMA.
Authors: Andréa A Brandão; Celso Amodeo; Cristina Alcântara; Eduardo Barbosa; Fernando Nobre; Fernando Pinto; José Fernando Vilela-Martin; José Mesquita Bastos; Juan Carlos Yugar-Toledo; Marco Antônio Mota-Gomes; Mario Fritsch Toros Neves; Marcus Vinícius Bolívar Malachias; Manuel de Carvalho Rodrigues; Oswaldo Passarelli; Paulo César B Veiga Jardim; Pedro Guimarães Cunha; Rui Póvoa; Teresa Fonseca; Vitor Paixão Dias; Weimar Sebba Barroso; Wille Oigman Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Lara B T Yugar; Beatriz Moreno; Heitor Moreno; José F Vilela-Martin; Juan C Yugar-Toledo Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2017-11-06 Impact factor: 3.738