OBJECTIVES: Type II activation describes the U-shaped electrical activation of the left ventricle (LV) with a line of block in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). We sought to determine if a corresponding pattern of contraction could be identified using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine imaging and whether this predicted response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: U-shaped LV electrical activation in LBBB has been shown to predict favorable response to CRT. It is not known if the degree of electromechanical coupling is such that the same is true for LV contraction patterns. METHODS: A total of 52 patients (48% ischemic) scheduled for CRT implantation prospectively underwent pre-implantation CMR cine analysis using endocardial contour tracking software to generate time-volume curves and contraction propagation maps. These were analyzed to assess the contraction sequence of the LV. The effect of contraction pattern on CRT response in terms of reverse remodeling (RR) and clinical parameters (New York Heart Association functional class, 6-min walk distance and Heart Failure Questionnaire score) was assessed at 6 months. RESULTS: Two types of contraction pattern were identified; homogenous spread from septum to lateral wall (type I, n = 27) and presence of block with a subsequent U-shaped contraction pattern (type II, n = 25). Rates of RR in those with a type 2 pattern were significantly greater at 6 months (80% vs. 26%, p < 0.001) as was mean increase in 6-min walk distance (126 ± 106 m vs. 55 ± 60 m; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Cine CMR can identify a U-shaped pattern of contraction which predicts increased echocardiographic and clinical response rates to CRT in patients with LBBB.
OBJECTIVES: Type II activation describes the U-shaped electrical activation of the left ventricle (LV) with a line of block in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). We sought to determine if a corresponding pattern of contraction could be identified using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine imaging and whether this predicted response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: U-shaped LV electrical activation in LBBB has been shown to predict favorable response to CRT. It is not known if the degree of electromechanical coupling is such that the same is true for LV contraction patterns. METHODS: A total of 52 patients (48% ischemic) scheduled for CRT implantation prospectively underwent pre-implantation CMR cine analysis using endocardial contour tracking software to generate time-volume curves and contraction propagation maps. These were analyzed to assess the contraction sequence of the LV. The effect of contraction pattern on CRT response in terms of reverse remodeling (RR) and clinical parameters (New York Heart Association functional class, 6-min walk distance and Heart Failure Questionnaire score) was assessed at 6 months. RESULTS: Two types of contraction pattern were identified; homogenous spread from septum to lateral wall (type I, n = 27) and presence of block with a subsequent U-shaped contraction pattern (type II, n = 25). Rates of RR in those with a type 2 pattern were significantly greater at 6 months (80% vs. 26%, p < 0.001) as was mean increase in 6-min walk distance (126 ± 106 m vs. 55 ± 60 m; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Cine CMR can identify a U-shaped pattern of contraction which predicts increased echocardiographic and clinical response rates to CRT in patients with LBBB.
Authors: Zak Loring; Brett D Atwater; Xiaojuan Xia; Jimmy Axelsson; Igor Klem; Robin Nijveldt; Erik B Schelbert; Jean-Philippe Couderc; David G Strauss; Martin Ugander; Björn Wieslander Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2019-02-19
Authors: Giselle Revah; Vincent Wu; Peter R Huntjens; Eve Piekarski; Janice Y Chyou; Leon Axel Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: George Bazoukis; Jeremy Man Ho Hui; Yan Hiu Athena Lee; Oscar Hou In Chou; Dimitrios Sfairopoulos; Konstantinos Vlachos; Athanasios Saplaouras; Konstantinos P Letsas; Michael Efremidis; Gary Tse; Vassilios S Vassiliou; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Gregory R Hartlage; Jonathan D Suever; Stephanie Clement-Guinaudeau; Patrick T Strickland; Nima Ghasemzadeh; R Patrick Magrath; Ankit Parikh; Stamatios Lerakis; Michael H Hoskins; Angel R Leon; Michael S Lloyd; John N Oshinski Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Michael Steinmetz; Simon Usenbenz; Johannes Tammo Kowallick; Olga Hösch; Wieland Staab; Torben Lange; Shelby Kutty; Joachim Lotz; Gerd Hasenfuß; Thomas Paul; Andreas Schuster Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Johannes T Kowallick; Geraint Morton; Pablo Lamata; Roy Jogiya; Shelby Kutty; Gerd Hasenfuß; Joachim Lotz; Amedeo Chiribiri; Eike Nagel; Andreas Schuster Journal: JRSM Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2017-05-15