Literature DB >> 23735410

Development and evaluation of a brief self-completed family history screening tool for common chronic disease prevention in primary care.

Fiona M Walter1, A Toby Prevost, Linda Birt, Nicola Grehan, Kathy Restarick, Helen C Morris, Stephen Sutton, Peter Rose, Sarah Downing, Jon D Emery.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Family history is an important risk factor for many common chronic diseases, but it remains underutilised for diagnostic assessment and disease prevention in routine primary care. AIM: To develop and validate a brief self-completed family history questionnaire (FHQ) for systematic primary care assessment for family history of diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Two-stage diagnostic validation study in 10 general practices in eastern England. Method Participants aged 18-50 years were identified via random sampling from electronic searches of general practice records. Participants completed a FHQ then had a three-generational 'gold standard' pedigree taken, to determine disease risk category. In stage 1, the FHQ comprised 12 items; in stage 2 the shorter 6-item FHQ was validated against the same 'gold standard'.
RESULTS: There were 1147 participants (stage 1: 618; stage 2: 529). Overall, 32% were at increased risk of one or more marker conditions (diabetes 18.9%, ischaemic heart disease 13.3%, breast cancer 6.2%, colorectal cancer 2.2%). The shorter 6-item FHQ performed very well for all four conditions: pooled data from both stages show diabetes, sensitivity = 98%, specificity = 94%; ischaemic heart disease, sensitivity = 93%, specificity = 81%; breast cancer, sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 83%; colorectal cancer, sensitivity = 96%, specificity = 88%, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 for males and 0.89 for females.
CONCLUSION: This brief self-completed FHQ shows good diagnostic accuracy for identifying people at higher risk of four common chronic diseases. It could be used in routine primary care to identify patients who would be most likely to benefit from a more detailed pedigree and risk assessment, and consequent management strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23735410      PMCID: PMC3662456          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X668186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  31 in total

1.  Research priorities for evaluating family history in the prevention of common chronic diseases.

Authors:  Paula W Yoon; Maren T Scheuner; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  The family history--more important than ever.

Authors:  Alan E Guttmacher; Francis S Collins; Richard H Carmona
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Advantages of QRISK2 (2010): the key issue is ethnicity and extent of reallocation.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; Carol Coupland; John Robson; Peter Brindle
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H J Järvinen; M Aarnio; H Mustonen; K Aktan-Collan; L A Aaltonen; P Peltomäki; A De La Chapelle; J P Mecklin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Collecting genetic information in primary care: evaluating a new family history tool.

Authors:  Nadeem Qureshi; Jane Bethea; Bernadette Modell; Paul Brennan; Alexia Papageorgiou; Sandy Raeburn; Rhydian Hapgood; Michael Modell
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 6.  Physician advice for smoking cessation.

Authors:  T Lancaster; L Stead
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

7.  Effect of adding systematic family history enquiry to cardiovascular disease risk assessment in primary care: a matched-pair, cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Nadeem Qureshi; Sarah Armstrong; Paula Dhiman; Paula Saukko; Joan Middlemass; Philip H Evans; Joe Kai
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  The comprehensiveness of family cancer history assessments in primary care.

Authors:  Harvey J Murff; Robert A Greevy; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007

Review 9.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-04

10.  How does a simple enquiry compare to a detailed family history questionnaire to identify coronary heart disease or diabetic familial risk?

Authors:  Miranda Wijdenes-Pijl; Lidewij Henneman; Laura Cross-Bardell; Danielle R M Timmermans; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  13 in total

1.  Genetic cancer risk assessment in general practice: systematic review of tools available, clinician attitudes, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Flore Laforest; Pia Kirkegaard; Baljinder Mann; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  What characterizes cancer family history collection tools? A critical literature review.

Authors:  J E Cleophat; H Nabi; S Pelletier; K Bouchard; M Dorval
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Assessing family history of chronic disease in primary care: Prevalence, documentation, and appropriate screening.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Denise Campbell-Scherer; Joanne A Permaul; Jesse Myers; Donna P Manca; Christopher Meaney; Rahim Moineddin; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Family history recording in UK general practice: the lIFeLONG study.

Authors:  Molly Dineen; Kate Sidaway-Lee; Denis Pereira Gray; Philip H Evans
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  A qualitative evaluation of the psychosocial impact of family history screening in Australian primary care.

Authors:  Gabrielle T Reid; Fiona M Walter; Jon D Emery
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Correcting for bias in the selection and validation of informative diagnostic tests.

Authors:  David S Robertson; A Toby Prevost; Jack Bowden
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Genetics in primary care: validating a tool to pre-symptomatically assess common disease risk using an Australian questionnaire on family history.

Authors:  Elisa J F Houwink; Olga R Hortensius; Kees van Boven; Annet Sollie; Mattijs E Numans
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2019-05-02

8.  Psychological impact of family history risk assessment in primary care: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Linda Birt; Jon D Emery; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton; Fiona M Walter
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Development and validation of a family history screening questionnaire in Australian primary care.

Authors:  Jon D Emery; Gabrielle Reid; A Toby Prevost; David Ravine; Fiona M Walter
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer G Walker; Finlay Macrae; Ingrid Winship; Jasmeen Oberoi; Sibel Saya; Shakira Milton; Adrian Bickerstaffe; James G Dowty; Richard De Abreu Lourenço; Malcolm Clark; Louise Galloway; George Fishman; Fiona M Walter; Louisa Flander; Patty Chondros; Driss Ait Ouakrim; Marie Pirotta; Lyndal Trevena; Mark A Jenkins; Jon D Emery
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.