Literature DB >> 23735347

Clostridium difficile infection associated with pig farms.

Elisabeth C Keessen, Céline Harmanus, Wietske Dohmen, Ed J Kuijper, Len J A Lipman.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile; agriculture; bacteria; enteric infections; farmers; livestock; pig farms; pigs; workers; zoonoses

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23735347      PMCID: PMC3713831          DOI: 10.3201/eid1906.121645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Clostridium difficile of PCR ribotype 078 causes enteric disease in humans and pigs (,); a recent pan-European study revealed that this type was the third most frequently found type of C. difficile (). The finding of identical C. difficile PCR ribotype 078 isolates in piglets with diarrhea and in humans with C. difficile infection (CDI) led to the suggestion that interspecies transmission might occur (,). Because C. difficile can be detected in the immediate environment of pig farms, we investigated intestinal colonization with C. difficile in pigs and in pig farmers, their relatives, and their employees in the Netherlands. Persons living on 32 pig farms were enrolled as part of a longitudinal intervention study of several zoonotic agents. Pig farmers were partly recruited through the Dutch Farmer’s Association or by veterinarians, who informed potential participants about the aims of the study. Inclusion criteria for participants were that they should work and/or live on the farm; the farms were either closed farms or multipliers (farms at which piglets are bred and then sold to other farms, where they are raised until ready for slaughter). The number of persons willing to submit a fecal sample per farm ranged from 1 to 10 (mean 4, median 5). Veterinarians who normally provided veterinary services to each farm collected fresh fecal samples from the floors of 10 animal wards per farm. No a priori knowledge of C. difficile colonization status of the pigs on the farms was available. Fecal samples from humans and from animal wards were cultured for the presence of toxinogenic C. difficile by using previously described methods (,,). Of the 128 persons who enrolled in the study, 48 had daily contact with pigs, 22 had weekly contact with pigs, and 36 had contact with pigs varying from monthly to less than yearly; no contact information was available for 22 participants. A total of 12 (25%) of 48 persons who had daily contact with pigs had fecal samples positive for C. difficile colonization; for persons who had weekly contact with pigs, 3 (14%) of 22 had positive samples. Daily to weekly contact with pigs versus monthly to less than yearly contact was significantly associated with an intestinal presence of C. difficile (p = 0.003). C. difficile was also found in fecal samples from 3 persons for whom no contact information was available. The C. difficile carriage rate among those with daily to weekly contact with pigs (15/70, 21%) was higher than the carriage rate of <5% reported for nonhospitalized adults with CDI (). A total of 18 C. difficile–positive human samples were detected at 16 of 32 pig farms investigated. At 2 of these farms, only 1 person submitted a sample, but at the other 14 farms, the number of participants ranged from 2 to 9 (mean 4, median 3). C. difficile was found in pig manure at all farms; 10%–80% of the wards were positive per farm. Corresponding C. difficile PCR ribotypes were cultured from samples from pigs and humans; type 078 was found in humans and pigs on 15 farms and type 045 in a farmer and his pigs on 1 farm. Multilocus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) and antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing (E-test) were performed on human isolates from 15 farms and 1 porcine isolate per farm. One human isolate could not be typed because the isolate was lost during laboratory activities. MLVA results showed that, at 2 farms, the human and porcine isolates were not genetically related, whereas at the other 13 farms, human and porcine isolates were genetically related, including 100% identical MLVA results for type 078 human and porcine isolates at 3 farms. Isolates were considered genetically related when the summed tandem repeat differences were <10 (,,). Antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing demonstrated similar susceptibility levels among isolates. For human and porcine isolates from 9 of 15 farms, MIC variability of <1 μg/L was found for imipenem, cotrimoxazole, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, and moxifloxacin. For the remaining 6 farms, drug susceptibility patterns for human isolates differed from pig isolates for 1 drug only: for 1 farm, MICs of erythromycin were 256 μg/L for human isolates and 0.38 μg/L for pig isolates; for 3 farms, MICs of erythromycin were 256 μg/L for pig isolates and 0.25 μg/L for human isolates; and for 2 farms, MICs of imipenem were 32 μg/L for pig isolates and 1.5 or 2 μg/L for human isolates. In summary, the high C. difficile carriage rate among persons who had direct contact with pigs and the fact that these C. difficile isolates were genotypically and phenotypically similar to the pig isolates from the same farms indicates that transmission occurs either by direct contact or through the environment. Prospective studies are needed to determine the relationship between C. difficile carriage and development of CDI in this population.
  6 in total

1.  Emergence of Clostridium difficile infection due to a new hypervirulent strain, polymerase chain reaction ribotype 078.

Authors:  Abraham Goorhuis; Dennis Bakker; Jeroen Corver; Sylvia B Debast; Celine Harmanus; Daan W Notermans; Aldert A Bergwerff; Frido W Dekker; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis for investigation of Clostridium difficile transmission in Hospitals.

Authors:  Jane W Marsh; Mary M O'Leary; Kathleen A Shutt; A William Pasculle; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding; Carlene A Muto; Lee H Harrison
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Host and pathogen factors for Clostridium difficile infection and colonization.

Authors:  Vivian G Loo; Anne-Marie Bourgault; Louise Poirier; François Lamothe; Sophie Michaud; Nathalie Turgeon; Baldwin Toye; Axelle Beaudoin; Eric H Frost; Rodica Gilca; Paul Brassard; Nandini Dendukuri; Claire Béliveau; Matthew Oughton; Ivan Brukner; Andre Dascal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Clostridium difficile infection in Europe: a hospital-based survey.

Authors:  Martijn P Bauer; Daan W Notermans; Birgit H B van Benthem; Jon S Brazier; Mark H Wilcox; Maja Rupnik; Dominique L Monnet; Jaap T van Dissel; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Clostridium difficile: an important pathogen of food animals.

Authors:  J Glenn Songer; Michael A Anderson
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 3.331

6.  Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078 toxinotype V found in diarrhoeal pigs identical to isolates from affected humans.

Authors:  Sylvia B Debast; Leo A M G van Leengoed; Abraham Goorhuis; Celine Harmanus; Ed J Kuijper; Aldert A Bergwerff
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.491

  6 in total
  21 in total

Review 1.  The Intersection Between Colonization Resistance, Antimicrobial Stewardship, and Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Rossana Rosa; Curtis J Donskey; L Silvia Munoz-Price
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Overall and cause-specific mortality in a cohort of farmers and their spouses.

Authors:  Srishti Shrestha; Christine G Parks; Alexander P Keil; David M Umbach; Catherine C Lerro; Charles F Lynch; Honglei Chen; Aaron Blair; Stella Koutros; Jonathan N Hofmann; Laura E Beane Freeman; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Hurricane flooding and acute gastrointestinal illness in North Carolina.

Authors:  Arbor J L Quist; Mike Dolan Fliss; Timothy J Wade; Paul L Delamater; David B Richardson; Lawrence S Engel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Exposure to industrial hog operations and gastrointestinal illness in North Carolina, USA.

Authors:  Arbor J L Quist; David A Holcomb; Mike Dolan Fliss; Paul L Delamater; David B Richardson; Lawrence S Engel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 10.753

Review 5.  Clostridium difficile infection: epidemiology, diagnosis and understanding transmission.

Authors:  Jessica S H Martin; Tanya M Monaghan; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 6.  Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals.

Authors:  J Scott Weese
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.279

7.  Whole genome sequencing reveals potential spread of Clostridium difficile between humans and farm animals in the Netherlands, 2002 to 2011.

Authors:  C W Knetsch; T R Connor; A Mutreja; S M van Dorp; I M Sanders; H P Browne; D Harris; L Lipman; E C Keessen; J Corver; E J Kuijper; T D Lawley
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2014-11-13

8.  Prevalence and risk factors for colonization of Clostridium difficile among adults living near livestock farms in the Netherlands.

Authors:  T P Zomer; E VAN Duijkeren; C C H Wielders; C Veenman; P Hengeveld; W VAN DER Hoek; S C DE Greeff; L A M Smit; D J Heederik; C J Yzermans; E J Kuijper; C B M Maassen
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.434

9.  International Clostridium difficile animal strain collection and large diversity of animal associated strains.

Authors:  Sandra Janezic; Valerija Zidaric; Bart Pardon; Alexander Indra; Branko Kokotovic; Jose Luis Blanco; Christian Seyboldt; Cristina Rodriguez Diaz; Ian R Poxton; Vincent Perreten; Ilenia Drigo; Alena Jiraskova; Matjaz Ocepek; J Scott Weese; J Glenn Songer; Mark H Wilcox; Maja Rupnik
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 10.  Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Community-Associated Clostridium difficile Infection: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Lauren E Bloomfield; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2016-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.