Literature DB >> 23735224

Management of osteoporosis in primary care before and after the result of densitometry: treatments in real practice versus the recommended by guidelines. CANAL study.

Antonio Naranjo1, José Rosas, Soledad Ojeda, Esteban Salas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the requirements for osteoporosis (OP) treatment of primary care physicians (PCP), before and after knowing the result of a bone densitometry (DXA).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 50 years older women from two Spanish health areas (Canary Islands and Alicante). The FRAX risk factors were collected and we reviewed the requirements for OP treatment before DXA and in the subsequent months (bisphosphonates, strontium, raloxifene/bazedoxifene, estrogens, parathyroid hormone). To evaluate the appropriateness of treatment we used published guidelines. A high risk for hip fracture was considered if FRAX ≥ 3% or the patient had a history of fragility fracture
RESULTS: We included 339 women (mean age: 63 years). Before DXA, 14% of Canarias and 58% of Alicante were receiving treatment. Thirty seven percent of treated patients and 26% of the untreated patients had a high fracture risk before DXA. The average FRAX for a high risk of fracture and hip fracture was 5.6% and 2%, respectively. After DXA, the percentage of treated patients rose from 35 to 39%: increasing from 14 to 28% in the Canary Islands and decreasing from 58 to 51% in Alicante. Overall, treatment was received by 64% of patients with OP, 38% of patients with osteopenia and 15% of those with normal DXA. When the OP treatment guidelines were applied, we found that 7% needed treatment according to the most restrictive guidelines and 43% according to the most flexible guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: There is great variability in treatment for OP prescribed before after DXA between GP. A broad consensus guideline between different specialties is required to optimize clinical practice.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atención primaria; Fractura; Fracture; Osteoporosis; Primary care; Tratamiento; Treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23735224     DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2013.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reumatol Clin        ISSN: 1699-258X


  3 in total

1.  Quality of Life in Women over 65 Years of Age Diagnosed with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  María Belén Pastor-Robles; Agustín Mayo-Íscar; Rosa M Cárdaba-García; Virtudes Niño-Martín
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Osteoporosis: A Step-by-Step Case-Based Study.

Authors:  Lokesh Goyal; Kunal Ajmera
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-06

3.  Clinical decision support system for the management of osteoporosis compared to NOGG guidelines and an osteology specialist: a validation pilot study.

Authors:  Haukur T Gudmundsson; Karen E Hansen; Bjarni V Halldorsson; Bjorn R Ludviksson; Bjorn Gudbjornsson
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.796

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.