| Literature DB >> 23734839 |
Yoon Hong Chun1, Hye Rang Kim, Kyungdo Han, Yong-Gyu Park, Ho Jin Song, Kyung-Sun Na.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the relationship between dyslipidemia and dry eye disease (DED) in a Korean population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23734839 PMCID: PMC3680171 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-12-84
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Baseline characteristics of demographic, lifestyle, and medical factors of subjects according to gender and dry eye diseses
| Age (years) | 44.2 ± 0.5 | 47 ± 1.9 | 0.2729 | 46.2 ± 0.5 | 44.9 ± 1.1 | 0.1566 |
| Residential district (% rural) | 21.8(3.3) | 22.2(5.3) | 0.9171 | 23.4(3.5) | 14.4(3.1) | 0.0007 |
| Monthly income (% lowest quartile) | 14.9(1.1) | 13.3(3.8) | 0.6809 | 19.3(1.2) | 18.4(2.5) | 0.7324 |
| Education (% some college≥) | 36.7(1.6) | 37.9(5.7) | 0.8314 | 28.9(1.4) | 28.7(2.9) | 0.9368 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24 ± 0.1 | 23.8 ± 0.3 | 0.0156 | 23.3 ± 0.1 | 22.7 ± 0.2 | 0.5919 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 84.9 ± 0.9 | 84.2 ± 0.9 | 0.0063 | 78.1 ± 0.3 | 76.4 ± 0.6 | 0.593 |
| Smoker (%) | 42.3(1.2) | 39.8(5.7) | 0.648 | 5.5(0.6) | 3.6(1.3) | 0.2473 |
| Heavy-drinker (%) | 18.2(0.9) | 13.3(3.7) | 0.2571 | 1.8(0.3) | 1.5(0.9) | 0.7757 |
| Exercise (% yes) | 25.7(1.2) | 23.8(5) | 0.7217 | 20.3(1.1) | 16(2.4) | 0.1141 |
| Menopause (% yes) | NA | NA | NA | 35.5(1.5) | 38.3(3.1) | 0.4255 |
| Symptoms of DED (% yes) | 8(1) | 81.3(4.7) | <.0001 | 12.1(1.1) | 81.4(3) | <.0001 |
| Diabetes (% yes) | 11(0.9) | 10.9(3.3) | 0.9851 | 9.1(0.8) | 8.9(1.6) | 0.8944 |
| Hypertension (% yes) | 31(1.5) | 27.3(5.7) | 0.5244 | 46.5(1.4) | 48.3(3.3) | 0.6178 |
| Rheumatoid arthritis history (% yes) | 1.6(0.4) | 1.4(1.1) | 0.8616 | 3.1(0.4) | 3.2(0.9) | 0.9261 |
| Any ophthalmic surgery (% yes) | 7.8(0.6) | 24.6(5.1) | <.0001 | 13.5(0.8) | 24.1(2.4) | <.0001 |
| Mean SBP (mmHg) | 122 ± 0.5 | 121.2 ± 1.7 | 0.3422 | 117.4 ± 0.6 | 116.3 ± 1 | 0.6275 |
| Mean DBP (mmHg) | 80.4 ± 0.4 | 78.7 ± 0.9 | 0.8309 | 74.3 ± 0.3 | 74.2 ± 0.5 | 0.0868 |
| Laboratory data | | | | | | |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 98.2 ± 0.7 | 98.1 ± 1.9 | 0.8866 | 94.3 ± 0.5 | 94.1 ± 1.2 | 0.9478 |
| Insulin (uIU/mL) | 10.4 ± 0.1 | 9.9 ± 0.4 | 0.375 | 10.5 ± 0.1 | 10.1 ± 0.2 | 0.3519 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 187.2 ± 1 | 184.5 ± 3.4 | 0.6799 | 186.7 ± 0.9 | 185.8 ± 2.2 | 0.4302 |
| Triglycerides (mf/dL) | 157.4 ± 3.9 | 134 ± 9.7 | 0.721 | 109.3 ± 2 | 106.2 ± 4 | 0.1337 |
| HDL | 49.6 ± 0.3 | 51.5 ± 1.5 | 0.6395 | 56 ± 0.3 | 56.3 ± 0.7 | 0.2197 |
| LDL | 112.3 ± 0.9 | 110.4 ± 3.3 | 0.8224 | 113.9 ± 0.7 | 113.4 ± 1.9 | 0.5698 |
Values are represented as means ± SD. Numbers in brackets represent percentages (standard error).
DED = dry eye disease; BMI = Body mass index; SBP = systolic blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein.
Figure 1Prevalence of dyslipidemia with respect to TC, HDL, LDL, and TG in patients with DED and normal control subjects stratified by age in male (A) and female (B). There were statistically significant differences the prevalence of high cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels between female DED patients aged >65 years and those without DED. The differences in high cholesterol prevalence seen in patients aged 20–65 years were also statistically significant. TC, total cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TG, triglycerides; DED, dry eye disease. *Statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. The cut-off value for dyslipidemia was any of the following: hypercholesterolemia (TC ≥ 200 mg/dL), hypertriglyceridemia (TG ≥150 mg/dL), low levels of HDL (<40 mg/dL), or high levels of LDL (≥100 mg/dL).
Figure 2Comparison of the prevalence (%) of different combinations of dyslipidemia in patients with dry eye disease (DED) and those without DED. A, male subject; B, female subject; DED ■; non-DED (gray circle), C, hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol ≥ 200 mg/dL); T, hypertriglyceridemia (triglyceride ≥150 mg/dL); H, low high-density cholesterol (HDL) < 40 mg/dL; L, high low-density cholesterol (LDL) ≥ 100 mg/dL. * Statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. The definition of dyslipidemia was the prevalence of any of the following conditions: hypercholesterolemia (TC ≥ 200 mg/dL); hypertriglyceridemia (TG ≥ 150 mg/dL); low HDL (<40 mg/dL); or high LDL (≥100 mg/dL).
Prevalence of dyslipidemiaΦ in patients of dry eye diseases and normal control by lipid profiles in Korean population
| Hypercholesterolemia | 11.3(0.8) | 8(3) | 0.351 | 11.7(0.7) | 16.2(2.3) | 0.033 | |||
| Hypertriglycemia | 21.5(1.2) | 20.3(5.6) | 0.8313 | 9.5(0.7) | 9.6(1.7) | 0.9595 | |||
| Low HDL | 33.5(1.4) | 33.6(5.4) | 0.9909 | 15.8(0.9) | 11.7(1.7) | 0.0461 | |||
| High LDL | 11.4(0.9) | 8.5(3) | 0.413 | 11.8(0.7) | 15.7(2.5) | 0.0921 | |||
| | | Male | | | Female | | |||
| | No | Yes | P-value | No | Yes | P-value | |||
| Hypercholesterolemia | 10.8(0.8) | 12.6(2.5) | 0.4816 | 11.8(0.8) | 14.8(1.7) | 0.095 | |||
| Hypertriglycemia | 21.4(1.3) | 25(3.8) | 0.3326 | 9.6(0.8) | 8.9(1.4) | 0.6573 | |||
| Low HDL | 33.3(1.4) | 29.7(3) | 0.2591 | 16.3(1.1) | 11.6(1.5) | 0.0215 | |||
| High LDL | 11.1(1) | 12(2.4) | 0.7271 | 12(0.7) | 14.8(1.8) | 0.1232 | |||
Data are expressed as percentage (standard error).
Φ The cut-off value of dyslipidemia was as any of the following : hypercholesterolemia (TC ≥ 200 mg/dL); hypertriglycemia (TG ≥150 mg/dL); low HDL, <40 mg/dL; or high LDL ≥ 100 mg/dL.
Odds ratio (95% CI) on multivariate analysis for anlalyzing association between lipid profiles and dry eye diseases in Korean population
| | | | | |
| MODEL1† | 0.677(0.308,1.488) | 0.94(0.477,1.853) | 1.006(0.635,1.593) | 0.704(0.328,1.511) |
| MODEL2‡ | 0.676(0.307,1.491) | 0.943(0.467,1.905) | 1.024(0.652,1.608) | 0.7(0.325,1.505) |
| MODEL3§ | 0.588(0.233,1.48) | 1.008(0.482,2.106) | 1.258(0.771,2.05) | 0.614(0.259,1.457) |
| | | | | |
| MODEL1† | 1.846(1.244,2.739) | 1.126(0.717,1.766) | 0.793(0.543,1.159) | 1.731(1.102,2.719) |
| MODEL2‡ | 1.795(1.21,2.661) | 1.173(0.742,1.854) | 0.812(0.555,1.187) | 1.687(1.07,2.66) |
| MODEL3§ | 1.77(1.127,2.78) | 1.241(0.719,2.141) | 0.697(0.414,1.174) | 1.521(0.893,2.59) |
The cut-off value of dyslipidemia was as any of the following : hypercholesterolemia (TC ≥ 200 mg/dL); hypertriglycemia (TG ≥150 mg/dL); low HDL, <40 mg/dL; or high LDL ≥ 100 mg/dL.
† Model1 = Adjusted for demographic factors (age, and body mass index)
‡ Model2 = Model1 + adjusted for lifestyle factors (smoking, drinking, exercise, and residential district)
§ Model3 = Model 2 + adjusted for medical factors (diabetes, hypertension, previous ocular surgery, menopause, and rheumatologic diseases).