Literature DB >> 23734752

The influence of pain sensitivity on the treatment outcome of transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Ho-Joong Kim1, Jin S Yeom, Joon Woo Lee, Bong-Soon Chang, Choon-Ki Lee, Gun-Woo Lee, Seung-Bin Im, Han Jo Kim.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of individual pain sensitivity on the results of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) for the patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Seventy-seven patients with LSS were included in this study. Prospectively planned evaluations were performed twice consecutively before and 2 months after TFESI. These included a detailed medical history, a physical examination, and completion of a series of questionnaires, including pain sensitivity questionnaire (PSQ), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain. The correlations were analyzed among variables between total PSQ/PSQ-moderate/PSQ-minor and pain and disability level measured by VAS for back/leg pain and ODI both before and 2 months after TFESI. Two months after TFESI, there were significant decreases in VAS for back/leg pain and ODI compared with those before injection. Before injection, VAS for back pain and leg pain was highly associated with the PSQ scores including total PSQ and PSQ subscores after adjustment for age, BMI, and grade of canal stenosis. However, any subscores of PSQ and total PSQ scores were not correlated with either VAS for back pain/leg pain or ODI 2 months after TFESI with adjustment made to age, BMI, gender, and grade of canal stenosis. This study highlights that individual pain sensitivity does not influence the outcomes of TFESI treatment in patients with LSS, even though pain sensitivity has a significant negative correlation with symptom severity of LSS.
© 2013 World Institute of Pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oswestry Disability Index; Visual Analog Pain Scale; lumbar spinalstenosis; pain measurement; pain sensitivity; sciatica; transforaminal epidural steroid injection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23734752     DOI: 10.1111/papr.12084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Pract        ISSN: 1530-7085            Impact factor:   3.183


  6 in total

1.  The influence of gender on postoperative PROMIS physical function outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  James M Parrish; Nathaniel W Jenkins; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Thomas S Brundage; Kern Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04-10

Review 2.  Efficacy of epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Alan David Kaye; Kavita Manchikanti; Mark Boswell; Vidyasagar Pampati; Joshua Hirsch
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-02-01

3.  Evaluation of the responsiveness of outcome measures after spine injection: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Jiwoon Seo; Joon Woo Lee; Yusuhn Kang; Eugene Lee; Joong Mo Ahn; Dong Hyun Kim; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Ismail Yuce; Okan Kahyaoglu; Muzeyyen Ataseven; Halit Cavusoglu; Yunus Aydin
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2020-08-24

Review 5.  Epidural Steroid Injections for Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Massimiliano Carassiti; Giuseppe Pascarella; Alessandro Strumia; Fabrizio Russo; Giuseppe Francesco Papalia; Rita Cataldo; Francesca Gargano; Fabio Costa; Michelangelo Pierri; Francesca De Tommasi; Carlo Massaroni; Emiliano Schena; Felice Eugenio Agrò
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Understanding Ocular Discomfort and Dryness Using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire.

Authors:  Wing Li; Andrew D Graham; Meng C Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.