Literature DB >> 23734544

Soft palate length and upper airway relationship in OSA and non-OSA subjects.

Yuko Shigeta1, Takumi Ogawa, Ikawa Tomoko, Glenn T Clark, Reyes Enciso.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The narrowest area of the airway between the posterior nasal opening and the epiglottis is usually located in the retro palatal area. Many consider this the most likely site of airway obstruction during an obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) event. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in soft palate and airway length between OSA and non-OSA patients.
METHODS: In this study, we analyzed the ratio of the soft palate and the upper airway length in 45 consecutive patients. Twenty-five had an Apnea-Hypoapnea Index of more than 5 events per hour and were classified in the OSA group (male, 19; female, 6). These patients were compared with 20 normal controls (male, 12; female, 8). Controls who complained of snoring did have sleep studies (n = 5). The other fifteen controls were clinically asymptomatic and did not have sleep studies. Medical computed tomography scans were taken to determine the length of the upper airway and the soft palate length measured in the midsagittal image.
RESULTS: Soft palate length was significantly larger in OSA patients compared to controls (p = 0.009), and in men compared to women (p = 0.002). However, there were no differences in airway length. The soft palate length, as a percent of oropharyngeal airway length, was significantly larger in OSA patients compared to controls (p = < 0.0001) and in men compared to women (p = 0.02). Soft palate length increases significantly with age by 0.3 mm per year in males (after adjustment for body mass index (BMI) and OSA). Soft palate length as a percent of airway length is larger in OSA patients and increases significantly with BMI in males only after adjusting for age.
CONCLUSION: In this study, OSA patients had a longer soft palate in proportion to their oropharyngeal airway compared to controls as well as men compared to women. This proportion could be used for identifying patients at risk for OSA in combination with age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23734544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Dent J        ISSN: 0040-4284


  6 in total

1.  Evidence Supports No Relationship between Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Premolar Extraction: An Electronic Health Records Review.

Authors:  Ann J Larsen; D Brad Rindal; John P Hatch; Sheryl Kane; Stephen E Asche; Chris Carvalho; John Rugh
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  The interplay between tongue tissue volume, hyoid position, and airway patency.

Authors:  Jason P Kirkness; Mudiaga Sowho; Emi Murano
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Inter-examiner agreement of the systematic physical examination in patients with obstructive sleep disorders.

Authors:  Danilo Anunciatto Sguillar; Tatiana de Aguiar Vidigal; João Paulo Mangussi; Lia Bittencourt; Luiz Carlos Gregório; Sergio Tufik; Fernanda Louise Martinho Haddad
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Validation of manufacturers' laryngeal mask airway size selection standard: a large retrospective study.

Authors:  Yaoyao Ren; Cuicui Cao; Xuan Liang; Zhihai Ju; Ling Zhang; Xu Cui; Guyan Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

5.  Pathophysiology of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Aging Women.

Authors:  Qingchao Qiu; Jason H Mateika
Journal:  Curr Sleep Med Rep       Date:  2021-10-03

6.  Does seasonality affect snoring? A study based on international data from the past decade.

Authors:  Ping Wang; Cai Chen; Xingwei Wang; Ningling Zhang; Danyang Lv; Wei Li; Fulai Peng; Xiuli Wang
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.