Literature DB >> 23734492

Mapping behavioral landscapes for animal movement: a finite mixture modeling approach.

Jeff A Tracey1, Jun Zhu, Erin Boydston, Lisa Lyren, Robert N Fisher, Kevin R Crooks.   

Abstract

Because of its role in many ecological processes, movement of animals in response to landscape features is an important subject in ecology and conservation biology. In this paper, we develop models of animal movement in relation to objects or fields in a landscape. We took a finite mixture modeling approach in which the component densities are conceptually related to different choices for movement in response to a landscape feature, and the mixing proportions are related to the probability of selecting each response as a function of one or more covariates. We combined particle swarm optimization and an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm to obtain maximum-likelihood estimates of the model parameters. We used this approach to analyze data for movement of three bobcats in relation to urban areas in southern California, USA. A behavioral interpretation of the models revealed similarities and differences in bobcat movement response to urbanization. All three bobcats avoided urbanization by moving either parallel to urban boundaries or toward less urban areas as the proportion of urban land cover in the surrounding area increased. However, one bobcat, a male with a dispersal-like large-scale movement pattern, avoided urbanization at lower densities and responded strictly by moving parallel to the urban edge. The other two bobcats, which were both residents and occupied similar geographic areas, avoided urban areas using a combination of movements parallel to the urban edge and movement toward areas of less urbanization. However, the resident female appeared to exhibit greater repulsion at lower levels of urbanization than the resident male, consistent with empirical observations of bobcats in southern California. Using the parameterized finite mixture models, we mapped behavioral states to geographic space, creating a representation of a behavioral landscape. This approach can provide guidance for conservation planning based on analysis of animal movement data using statistical models, thereby linking connectivity evaluations to empirical data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23734492     DOI: 10.1890/12-0687.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  5 in total

1.  How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?

Authors:  Richard M Gunner; Mark D Holton; David M Scantlebury; Phil Hopkins; Emily L C Shepard; Adam J Fell; Baptiste Garde; Flavio Quintana; Agustina Gómez-Laich; Ken Yoda; Takashi Yamamoto; Holly English; Sam Ferreira; Danny Govender; Pauli Viljoen; Angela Bruns; O Louis van Schalkwyk; Nik C Cole; Vikash Tatayah; Luca Börger; James Redcliffe; Stephen H Bell; Nikki J Marks; Nigel C Bennett; Mariano H Tonini; Hannah J Williams; Carlos M Duarte; Martin C van Rooyen; Mads F Bertelsen; Craig J Tambling; Rory P Wilson
Journal:  Anim Biotelemetry       Date:  2021-10-16

2.  Incorporating periodic variability in hidden Markov models for animal movement.

Authors:  Michael Li; Benjamin M Bolker
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.600

3.  Linking behavioral states to landscape features for improved conservation management.

Authors:  Maitreyi Sur; Brian Woodbridge; Todd C Esque; Jim R Belthoff; Peter H Bloom; Robert N Fisher; Kathleen Longshore; Kenneth E Nussear; Jeff A Tracey; Melissa A Braham; Todd E Katzner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Interspecific interactions between wild felids vary across scales and levels of urbanization.

Authors:  Jesse S Lewis; Larissa L Bailey; Sue VandeWoude; Kevin R Crooks
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  The Intersection of Human Disturbance and Diel Activity, with Potential Consequences on Trophic Interactions.

Authors:  Michael A Patten; Jutta C Burger; Milan Mitrovich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.