Literature DB >> 23734351

The differential diagnosis of suspected stroke: a systematic review.

L M Gibson1, W Whiteley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the proportion of patients who had suffered a stroke and compare this to those patients with suspected stroke, and the range of differential diagnosis for suspected stroke.
METHODS: We searched for prospective studies of suspected stroke in electronic databases and our personal files. We undertook a meta-analysis of these studies, aimed at determining the proportions of patients with confirmed stroke in different settings.
RESULTS: We identified 29 studies involving 8,839 patients: 13 studies were from emergency departments, five from stroke units or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) clinics, three from primary care, three from ambulance services and five were unspecified. About three-quarters (74% [95% confidence interval (CI): 66 to 83%]) of patients had a diagnosis of stroke, though there was significant heterogeneity in this estimate. The five most frequent non-stroke diagnoses were seizure, syncope, sepsis, migraine and brain tumours.
CONCLUSION: Patients who had not had a stroke accounted for a significant proportion of people referred to stroke services. Expertise in the differential diagnoses of stroke is needed in order to manage the patients at the point of referral.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stroke; diagnosis; epidemiology; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23734351     DOI: 10.4997/JRCPE.2013.205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Edinb        ISSN: 1478-2715


  29 in total

1.  Liquid biopsy markers for stroke diagnosis.

Authors:  Harshani Wijerathne; Malgorzata A Witek; Alison E Baird; Steven A Soper
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 5.225

2.  The problems of smaller, rural and remote hospitals: Separating facts from fiction.

Authors:  Louella Vaughan; Nigel Edwards
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2020-02

3.  Occult primary brain cancers manifesting in the aftermath of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke.

Authors:  Klaus Kaae Andersen; Anne Julie Tybjerg; Alejandro Daniel Babore; Tom Skyhøj Olsen
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2020-04-15

4.  Diagnostic Puzzle of Acute Ischemic Stroke Mimics - Seizure Versus Post-Stroke Recrudescence: A Case Report.

Authors:  Femi Akindotun Akintomide; Reza Hosseini; Claudia Candale-Radu; Khurshid Khan
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-01

5.  Purines for Rapid Identification of Stroke Mimics (PRISM): study protocol for a diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Lisa Shaw; Sara Graziadio; Clare Lendrem; Nicholas Dale; Gary A Ford; Christine Roffe; Craig J Smith; Philip M White; Christopher I Price
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2021-05-20

Review 6.  Current concepts on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) perfusion-diffusion assessment in acute ischaemic stroke: a review & an update for the clinicians.

Authors:  Ernesto Roldan-Valadez; Mariana Lopez-Mejia
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging in acute ischemic stroke treatment.

Authors:  Bum Joon Kim; Hyun Goo Kang; Hye-Jin Kim; Sung-Ho Ahn; Na Young Kim; Steven Warach; Dong-Wha Kang
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 6.967

8.  Differences in Characteristics and Ambulance Pathway Adherence Between Strokes and Mimics Presenting to a Large UK Centralized Hyper Acute Stroke Unit (HASU).

Authors:  Camilla Sammut-Powell; Christopher Ashton; Kyriaki Paroutoglou; Adrian Parry-Jones
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 9.  Stroke and migraine is there a possible comorbidity?

Authors:  Alberto Spalice; Francesca Del Balzo; Laura Papetti; Anna Maria Zicari; Enrico Properzi; Francesca Occasi; Francesco Nicita; Marzia Duse
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.638

Review 10.  Predictive values of referrals for transient ischaemic attack from first-contact health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Kandiyali; Daniel S Lasserson; Penny Whiting; Alison Richards; Jonathan Mant
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.