Literature DB >> 23733955

Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues.

John T Cacioppo1, Stephanie Cacioppo, Gian C Gonzaga, Elizabeth L Ogburn, Tyler J VanderWeele.   

Abstract

Marital discord is costly to children, families, and communities. The advent of the Internet, social networking, and on-line dating has affected how people meet future spouses, but little is known about the prevalence or outcomes of these marriages or the demographics of those involved. We addressed these questions in a nationally representative sample of 19,131 respondents who married between 2005 and 2012. Results indicate that more than one-third of marriages in America now begin on-line. In addition, marriages that began on-line, when compared with those that began through traditional off-line venues, were slightly less likely to result in a marital break-up (separation or divorce) and were associated with slightly higher marital satisfaction among those respondents who remained married. Demographic differences were identified between respondents who met their spouse through on-line vs. traditional off-line venues, but the findings for marital break-up and marital satisfaction remained significant after statistically controlling for these differences. These data suggest that the Internet may be altering the dynamics and outcomes of marriage itself.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dyads; marital outcomes; social relationships

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23733955      PMCID: PMC3690854          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222447110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index.

Authors:  Janette L Funk; Ronald D Rogge
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2007-12

2.  Time use of youths by immigrant and native-born parents: ATUS results.

Authors:  Yelizavetta Kofman; Suzanne M Bianchi
Journal:  Mon Labor Rev       Date:  2012-06

3.  Online Dating: The Current Status-and Beyond.

Authors:  Arthur Aron
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2012-01

4.  Online Dating: A Critical Analysis From the Perspective of Psychological Science.

Authors:  Eli J Finkel; Paul W Eastwick; Benjamin R Karney; Harry T Reis; Susan Sprecher
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2012-01
  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  The limits of racial prejudice.

Authors:  Kevin Lewis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Swiping right: Alcohol, online dating, and sexual hookups in postcollege women.

Authors:  Emily R Wilhite; Kim Fromme
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2019-08-01

3.  Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting.

Authors:  Michael J Rosenfeld; Reuben J Thomas; Sonia Hausen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Scientific method: statistical errors.

Authors:  Regina Nuzzo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Sexually Transmitted Disease, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, and Pregnancy Testing Behaviors Among Internet and Mobile Dating Application Users and Nonusers, 2016.

Authors:  Alexandra Coor; Rachel Kachur; Allison Friedman; Lauren Witbart; Melissa A Habel; Kyle Bernstein; Matthew Hogben
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Confidence Sets for Cohen's d effect size images.

Authors:  Alexander Bowring; Fabian J E Telschow; Armin Schwartzman; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Digital technology and social change: the digital transformation of society from a historical perspective
.

Authors:  Martin Hilbert
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.986

8.  The personality, motivational, and need-based background of problematic Tinder use.

Authors:  Gábor Orosz; Mária Benyó; Bernadett Berkes; Edina Nikoletti; Éva Gál; István Tóth-Király; Beáta Bőthe
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 6.756

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.