Literature DB >> 23733839

Thromboelastometric maximum clot firmness in platelet-free plasma is influenced by the assay used.

Christoph J Schlimp1, Cristina Solomon, Gerald Hochleitner, Johannes Zipperle, Heinz Redl, Herbert Schöchl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Viscoelastic tests such as functional fibrinogen polymerization assays (FFPAs) in thrombelastography (TEG(®)) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®)) measure the elasticity of extrinsically activated clotting under conditions of platelet inhibition. There are no reports on whether components of the FFPAs have any effects on fibrin polymerization, aside from the effects of platelet inhibition.
METHODS: Using various platelet-free plasma (PFP) preparations, we compared the extrinsically activated EXTEM thromboelastometric assay with 3 FFPAs: FIBTEM, FIBTEM PLUS, and the Functional Fibrinogen Test(®) (FFTEG). These FFPAs activate coagulation extrinsically but additionally inhibit platelet function. We used calibration plasma (Instrumentation Laboratory and Siemens), pooled fresh-frozen plasma (Octaplas) and freshly prepared PFP from a healthy volunteer. EXTEM and all FFPAs were run in parallel on a ROTEM device.
RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) maximum clot firmness (MCF) values for all plasma preparations were: 20.5 mm (17.25-22.0 mm) in EXTEM, 23.0 mm (18.5-24.0 mm) in FIBTEM, 23.0 mm (18.25-24.75 mm) in FIBTEM PLUS, and 18.0 mm (16.0-19.0 mm) in FFTEG. Compared with EXTEM, FIBTEM and FIBTEM PLUS (P < 0.01) showed increased MCF values whereas FFTEG (P < 0.001) showed decreased MCF values. Further experiments in PFP showed that the platelet inhibitors used in the FFPAs (cytochalasin D or the glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab) were not causing these alterations in MCF. However, reducing the activating tissue factor concentration (by diluting the extrinsic assay) decreased the MCF.
CONCLUSIONS: We speculate that FIBTEM and FIBTEM PLUS may contain stabilizing agents that enhance fibrin polymerization whereas FFTEG might contain less tissue factor than the ROTEM assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23733839     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182937b91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of fibrin-based clot elasticity parameters measured by free oscillation rheometry (ReoRox ®) versus thromboelastometry (ROTEM ®).

Authors:  Cristina Solomon; Herbert Schöchl; Marco Ranucci; Ulf Schött; Christoph J Schlimp
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 1.713

2.  The use of frozen plasma samples in thromboelastometry.

Authors:  Christian Schoergenhofer; Nina Buchtele; Michael Schwameis; Johann Bartko; Bernd Jilma; Petra Jilma-Stohlawetz
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  Endothelial Cell-derived Extracellular Vesicles Size-dependently Exert Procoagulant Activity Detected by Thromboelastometry.

Authors:  Wolfgang Holnthoner; Cornelia Bonstingl; Carina Hromada; Severin Muehleder; Johannes Zipperle; Stefan Stojkovic; Heinz Redl; Johann Wojta; Herbert Schöchl; Johannes Grillari; Sylvia Weilner; Christoph J Schlimp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Preferential effects of low volume versus high volume replacement with crystalloid fluid in a hemorrhagic shock model in pigs.

Authors:  Martin Ponschab; Herbert Schöchl; Claudia Keibl; Henrik Fischer; Heinz Redl; Christoph J Schlimp
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 5.  Thromboelastography and Thromboelastometry in Assessment of Fibrinogen Deficiency and Prediction for Transfusion Requirement: A Descriptive Review.

Authors:  Henry T Peng; Bartolomeu Nascimento; Andrew Beckett
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-25       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.