Literature DB >> 23733815

Pectin extraction from quince (Cydonia oblonga) pomace applying alternative methods: effect of process variables and preliminary optimization.

Valeria Anahí Brown1, Jorge E Lozano, Diego Bautista Genovese.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to introduce alternative methods in the process of pectin extraction from quince pomace, to determine the effect of selected process variables (factors) on the obtained pectin, and to perform a preliminary optimization of the process. A fractional factorial experimental design was applied, where the factors considered were six: quince pomace pretreatment (washing vs blanching), drying method (hot air vs LPSSD), acid extraction conditions (pH, temperature, and time), and pectin extract concentration method (vacuum evaporation vs ultrafiltration). The effects of these factors and their interactions on pectin yield (Y: 0.2-34.2 mg/g), GalA content (44.5-76.2%), and DM (47.5-90.9%), were determined. For these three responses, extraction pH was the main effect, but it was involved in two and three factors interactions. Regarding alternative methods, LPSSD was required for maximum Y and GalA, and ultrafiltration for maximum GalA and DM. Response models were used to predict optimum process conditions (quince blanching, pomace drying by LPSSD, acid extraction at pH 2.20, 80 , 3 h, and concentration under vacuum) to simultaneously maximize Y (25.2 mg/g), GalA (66.3%), and DM (66.4%).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extraction systems; add; cell wall polysaccharides; fruits; pectins; quince pomace

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23733815     DOI: 10.1177/1082013212469616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Sci Technol Int        ISSN: 1082-0132            Impact factor:   2.023


  1 in total

1.  Box-Behnken design based statistical modeling for the extraction and physicochemical properties of pectin from sunflower heads and the comparison with commercial low-methoxyl pectin.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Peng; Guang Yang; Yun Shi; Yifa Zhou; Mengshan Zhang; Shanshan Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.