Literature DB >> 23733489

Memory reconsolidation allows the consolidation of a concomitant weak learning through a synaptic tagging and capture mechanism.

Lindsey F Cassini1, Rodrigo O Sierra, Josué Haubrich, Ana P Crestani, Fabiana Santana, Lucas de Oliveira Alvares, Jorge A Quillfeldt.   

Abstract

Motivated by the synaptic tagging and capture (STC) hypothesis, it was recently shown that a weak learning, only able to produce short-term memory (STM), can succeed in establishing long-term memory (LTM) with a concomitant, stronger experience. This is consistent with the capture, by the first-tagged event, of the so-called plasticity-related proteins (PRPs) provided by the second one. Here, we describe how a concomitant session of reactivation/reconsolidation of a stronger, contextual fear conditioning (CFC) memory, allowed LTM to result from a weak spatial object recognition (wSOR) training. Consistent with an STC process, the effect was observed only during a critical time window and was dependent on the CFC reconsolidation-related protein synthesis. Retrieval by itself (without reconsolidation) did not have the same promoting effect. We also found that the inactivation of the NMDA receptor by AP5 prevented wSOR training to receive this support of CFC reconsolidation (supposedly through the production of PRPs), which may be the equivalent of blocking the setting of a learning tag in the dorsal CA1 region for that task. Furthermore, either a Water Maze reconsolidation, or a CFC extinction session, allowed the formation of wSOR-LTM. These results suggest for the first time that a reconsolidation session can promote the consolidation of a concomitant weak learning through a probable STC mechanism. These findings allow new insights concerning the influence of reconsolidation in the acquisition of memories of otherwise unrelated events during daily life situations.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fear conditioning; hippocampus; nimodipine; reactivation; spatial object recognition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23733489     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  11 in total

1.  Behavioral tagging underlies memory reconsolidation.

Authors:  Iván Rabinovich Orlandi; Camila L Fullio; Matías Nicolás Schroeder; Martin Giurfa; Fabricio Ballarini; Diego Moncada
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The medial prefrontal cortex - hippocampus circuit that integrates information of object, place and time to construct episodic memory in rodents: Behavioral, anatomical and neurochemical properties.

Authors:  Owen Y Chao; Maria A de Souza Silva; Yi-Mei Yang; Joseph P Huston
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Resting state connectivity immediately following learning correlates with subsequent sleep-dependent enhancement of motor task performance.

Authors:  Michael D Gregory; Yigal Agam; Chindhuri Selvadurai; Amanda Nagy; Mark Vangel; Matthew Tucker; Edwin M Robertson; Robert Stickgold; Dara S Manoach
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The role of rewarding and novel events in facilitating memory persistence in a separate spatial memory task.

Authors:  Beatrice Salvetti; Richard G M Morris; Szu-Han Wang
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Novelty during a late postacquisition time window attenuates the persistence of fear memory.

Authors:  Cynthia Katche; Micol Tomaiuolo; Guido Dorman; Jorge H Medina; Haydee Viola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Novelty enhances memory persistence and remediates propranolol-induced deficit via reconsolidation.

Authors:  Szu-Han Wang
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.250

7.  Evidence of Maintenance Tagging in the Hippocampus for the Persistence of Long-Lasting Memory Storage.

Authors:  Micol Tomaiuolo; Cynthia Katche; Haydee Viola; Jorge H Medina
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation.

Authors:  Ana Paula Crestani; Flávia Zacouteguy Boos; Josué Haubrich; Rodrigo Ordoñez Sierra; Fabiana Santana; Johanna Marcela Duran Molina; Lindsey de Freitas Cassini; Lucas de Oliveira Alvares; Jorge Alberto Quillfeldt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Behavioral Tagging: A Translation of the Synaptic Tagging and Capture Hypothesis.

Authors:  Diego Moncada; Fabricio Ballarini; Haydée Viola
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Bridging Synaptic and Epigenetic Maintenance Mechanisms of the Engram.

Authors:  Madeleine Kyrke-Smith; Joanna M Williams
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 5.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.