David M Barnes1, Katherine M Keyes, Lisa M Bates. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W. 168th Street, Room 720D, New York, NY, 10032, USA, dmb23@columbia.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Non-Hispanic Blacks in the US have lower rates of major depression than non-Hispanic Whites, in national household samples. This has been termed a "paradox," as Blacks suffer greater exposure to social stressors, a risk factor for depression. Subgroup analyses can inform hypotheses to explain this paradox. For example, it has been suggested that selection bias in household samples undercounts depression in Blacks; if selection is driving the paradox, Black-White differences should be most pronounced among young men with low education. METHODS: We examined Black-White differences in lifetime major depression in subgroups defined simultaneously by sex, age, and education using data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) and the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES). RESULTS: In NESARC and CPES, Blacks had lower odds than Whites of lifetime major depression in 21 and 23 subgroups, respectively, of 24. All statistically significant differences were in subgroups favoring Blacks, and lower odds in Blacks were more pronounced among those with more education. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that hypotheses to explain the paradox must posit global mechanisms that pertain to all subgroups defined by sex, age, and education. Results do not lend support for the selection bias hypothesis.
PURPOSE: Non-Hispanic Blacks in the US have lower rates of major depression than non-Hispanic Whites, in national household samples. This has been termed a "paradox," as Blacks suffer greater exposure to social stressors, a risk factor for depression. Subgroup analyses can inform hypotheses to explain this paradox. For example, it has been suggested that selection bias in household samples undercounts depression in Blacks; if selection is driving the paradox, Black-White differences should be most pronounced among young men with low education. METHODS: We examined Black-White differences in lifetime major depression in subgroups defined simultaneously by sex, age, and education using data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) and the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES). RESULTS: In NESARC and CPES, Blacks had lower odds than Whites of lifetime major depression in 21 and 23 subgroups, respectively, of 24. All statistically significant differences were in subgroups favoring Blacks, and lower odds in Blacks were more pronounced among those with more education. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that hypotheses to explain the paradox must posit global mechanisms that pertain to all subgroups defined by sex, age, and education. Results do not lend support for the selection bias hypothesis.
Authors: Briana Mezuk; Jane A Rafferty; Kiarri N Kershaw; Darrell Hudson; Cleopatra M Abdou; Hedwig Lee; William W Eaton; James S Jackson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Steven G Heeringa; James Wagner; Myriam Torres; Naihua Duan; Terry Adams; Patricia Berglund Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Joshua Breslau; Kristin N Javaras; Deborah Blacker; Jane M Murphy; Sharon-Lise T Normand Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: H W Neighbors; S J Trierweiler; C Munday; E E Thompson; J S Jackson; V J Binion; J Gomez Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: S E Gilman; J Breslau; K J Conron; K C Koenen; S V Subramanian; A M Zaslavsky Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Doreen Koretz; Kathleen R Merikangas; A John Rush; Ellen E Walters; Philip S Wang Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Bridget F Grant; Deborah A Dawson; Frederick S Stinson; Patricia S Chou; Ward Kay; Roger Pickering Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2003-07-20 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Anne M Gadermann; Charles C Engel; James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Maria Petukhova; Patcho N Santiago; Benjamin Wu; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Mil Med Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Robin E McGee; Martha Sajatovic; Rakale C Quarells; Erika K Johnson; Hongyan Liu; Tanya M Spruill; Robert T Fraser; Mary Janevic; Cam Escoffery; Nancy J Thompson Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Julia R Steinberg; Jeanne M Tschann; Jillian T Henderson; Eleanor A Drey; Jody E Steinauer; Cynthia C Harper Journal: Contraception Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 3.375