OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the rate and determinants of faecal immunochemical test (FIT) compliance over a four-year period among asymptomatic participants in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme in Hong Kong. METHOD: Self-referred screening participants aged between 50 and 70 years who chose FIT for annual screening were followed up for four years (2008-2012). All participants were reminded up to three times yearly for FIT retrieval within two months of the expected screening date. The proportions of screening participants who failed to adhere to annual FIT tests in 1, 2, 3 and 4-years, respectively, after the initial screening uptake were evaluated. The factors associated with non-compliance with FITs in any year were assessed by a binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: From 5700 consecutive screening participants, the compliance rates to FIT were 95.1%, 79.9%, 66.2% and 68.4% at years one to four, respectively. The proportions of people missing one, two and three tests were 6.2%, 19.6% and 2.1%, respectively. From multivariate regression analysis, male subjects, younger participants, smokers and those with positive family history of CRC were more likely to be non-compliant. CONCLUSION: Participants identified as at higher risk for screening non-compliance should be especially considered for individual reminders to enhance screening effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the rate and determinants of faecal immunochemical test (FIT) compliance over a four-year period among asymptomatic participants in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme in Hong Kong. METHOD: Self-referred screening participants aged between 50 and 70 years who chose FIT for annual screening were followed up for four years (2008-2012). All participants were reminded up to three times yearly for FIT retrieval within two months of the expected screening date. The proportions of screening participants who failed to adhere to annual FIT tests in 1, 2, 3 and 4-years, respectively, after the initial screening uptake were evaluated. The factors associated with non-compliance with FITs in any year were assessed by a binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: From 5700 consecutive screening participants, the compliance rates to FIT were 95.1%, 79.9%, 66.2% and 68.4% at years one to four, respectively. The proportions of people missing one, two and three tests were 6.2%, 19.6% and 2.1%, respectively. From multivariate regression analysis, male subjects, younger participants, smokers and those with positive family history of CRC were more likely to be non-compliant. CONCLUSION:Participants identified as at higher risk for screening non-compliance should be especially considered for individual reminders to enhance screening effectiveness.
Authors: Martin C S Wong; Jessica Y L Ching; Thomas Y T Lam; Simpson K C Ng; John C T Wong; Justin C Y Wu; Francis K L Chan Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Ma Somsouk; Carly Rachocki; Ajitha Mannalithara; Dianne Garcia; Victoria Laleau; Barbara Grimes; Rachel B Issaka; Ellen Chen; Eric Vittinghoff; Jean A Shapiro; Uri Ladabaum Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Caitlin C Murphy; Ahana Sen; Bianca Watson; Samir Gupta; Helen Mayo; Amit G Singal Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Constantine Daskalakis; Melissa DiCarlo; Sarah Hegarty; Anuragh Gudur; Sally W Vernon; Ronald E Myers Journal: Prev Med Date: 2020-02-08 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Martin C S Wong; Jessica Y L Ching; Victor C W Chan; Renee Bruggemann; Thomas Y T Lam; Arthur K C Luk; Justin C Y Wu; Francis K L Chan; Joseph J Y Sung Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Martin C S Wong; Jessica Y L Ching; Victor C W Chan; Jeffrey P Shum; Thomas Y T Lam; Arthur K C Luk; Joseph J Y Sung Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Doris Y P Leung; Ka Ming Chow; Sally W S Lo; Winnie K W So; Carmen W H Chan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 3.390