Literature DB >> 23732241

Prospective cohort study of compliance with faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong.

Martin C S Wong1, Jessica Y L Ching, Thomas Y T Lam, Arthur K C Luk, Hoyee W Hirai, Sian M Griffiths, Francis K L Chan, Joseph J Y Sung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the rate and determinants of faecal immunochemical test (FIT) compliance over a four-year period among asymptomatic participants in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme in Hong Kong.
METHOD: Self-referred screening participants aged between 50 and 70 years who chose FIT for annual screening were followed up for four years (2008-2012). All participants were reminded up to three times yearly for FIT retrieval within two months of the expected screening date. The proportions of screening participants who failed to adhere to annual FIT tests in 1, 2, 3 and 4-years, respectively, after the initial screening uptake were evaluated. The factors associated with non-compliance with FITs in any year were assessed by a binary logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: From 5700 consecutive screening participants, the compliance rates to FIT were 95.1%, 79.9%, 66.2% and 68.4% at years one to four, respectively. The proportions of people missing one, two and three tests were 6.2%, 19.6% and 2.1%, respectively. From multivariate regression analysis, male subjects, younger participants, smokers and those with positive family history of CRC were more likely to be non-compliant.
CONCLUSION: Participants identified as at higher risk for screening non-compliance should be especially considered for individual reminders to enhance screening effectiveness.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AOR; Adjusted Odds Ratios; CRC; Colorectal Cancer; Colorectal cancer; Compliance; Determinants; FIT; FOBT; Faecal Immunochemical Tests; Faecal Occult Blood Tests; Faecal occult blood; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23732241     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  13 in total

1.  Association of Interactive Reminders and Automated Messages With Persistent Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Martin C S Wong; Jessica Y L Ching; Thomas Y T Lam; Simpson K C Ng; John C T Wong; Justin C Y Wu; Francis K L Chan
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Effectiveness and Cost of Organized Outreach for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ma Somsouk; Carly Rachocki; Ajitha Mannalithara; Dianne Garcia; Victoria Laleau; Barbara Grimes; Rachel B Issaka; Ellen Chen; Eric Vittinghoff; Jean A Shapiro; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  A Systematic Review of Repeat Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Ahana Sen; Bianca Watson; Samir Gupta; Helen Mayo; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Predictors of overall and test-specific colorectal Cancer screening adherence.

Authors:  Constantine Daskalakis; Melissa DiCarlo; Sarah Hegarty; Anuragh Gudur; Sally W Vernon; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Effectiveness of reminder strategies on cancer screening adherence: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin Cs Wong; Jessica Yl Ching; Junjie Huang; John Ct Wong; Thomas Yt Lam; Victor Cw Chan; Simpson Kc Ng; Zero Hui; Arthur Kc Luk; Justin Cy Wu; Francis Kl Chan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  COVID-19 Disruptions to Endoscopic Surveillance in Lynch Syndrome.

Authors:  Danielle B McKenna; Christina M Dudzik; Shria Kumar; Nadim Mahmud; Bryson W Katona
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2021-02-24

7.  Regret on choice of colorectal cancer screening modality was associated with poorer screening compliance: a 4-year prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Martin C S Wong; Jessica Y L Ching; Victor C W Chan; Renee Bruggemann; Thomas Y T Lam; Arthur K C Luk; Justin C Y Wu; Francis K L Chan; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Should prior FIT results be incorporated as an additional variable to estimate risk of colorectal neoplasia? A prospective study of 5,813 screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Martin C S Wong; Jessica Y L Ching; Victor C W Chan; Jeffrey P Shum; Thomas Y T Lam; Arthur K C Luk; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The comparative cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening using faecal immunochemical test vs. colonoscopy.

Authors:  Martin C S Wong; Jessica Y L Ching; Victor C W Chan; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Contributing Factors to Colorectal Cancer Screening among Chinese People: A Review of Quantitative Studies.

Authors:  Doris Y P Leung; Ka Ming Chow; Sally W S Lo; Winnie K W So; Carmen W H Chan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.