Literature DB >> 23731498

Does pharmacogenetic testing for CYP450 2D6 and 2C19 among patients with diagnoses within the schizophrenic spectrum reduce treatment costs?

Louise Herbild1, Stig E Andersen, Thomas Werge, Henrik B Rasmussen, Gesche Jürgens.   

Abstract

The effect of pharmacogenetic testing for CYP450 2D6 and 2C19 on treatment costs have not yet been documented. This study used Danish patient registers to calculate healthcare costs of treating patients with diagnoses within the schizophrenic spectrum for 1 year with or without pharmacogenetic testing for polymorphisms in the genes for the CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 enzymes. In a randomized, controlled trial, stratified with respect to metabolizer genotype, 104 patients were assigned to treatment based on pharmacogenetic testing and 103 patients to treatment as usual. Random exclusion of extensive and intermediate metabolizers was used to increase the frequency of extreme metabolizers (poor metabolizers and ultrarapid metabolizers for CYP2D6) to 20% in both groups. Cost differences were analysed at several levels including (i) overall healthcare expenditure, (ii) psychiatric hospital cost (iii) nonpsychiatric hospital cost, (iv) primary care spending and (v) pharmaceuticals. Statistically significant differences in costs of psychiatric care dependent on metabolizer status were found between intervention groups. Pharmacogenetic testing significantly reduced costs among the extreme metabolizers (poor metabolizers and ultrarapid metabolizers) to 28%. Use of primary care services and pharmaceuticals was also affected by the intervention.This study confirms earlier findings that extreme metabolizers (poor and ultrarapid metabolizers) incur higher costs than similar patients with a normal metabolizer genotype. However, this study shows that these excess costs can be reduced by pharmacogenetic testing. Pharmacogenetic testing for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 could thus be considered as a means of curtailing high psychiatric treatment costs among extreme metabolizers.
© 2013 Nordic Pharmacological Society. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23731498     DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.12093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 1742-7835            Impact factor:   4.080


  13 in total

1.  Clinical validity: Combinatorial pharmacogenomics predicts antidepressant responses and healthcare utilizations better than single gene phenotypes.

Authors:  C A Altar; J M Carhart; J D Allen; D K Hall-Flavin; B M Dechairo; J G Winner
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.550

2.  A Naturalistic Study of the Effectiveness of Pharmacogenetic Testing to Guide Treatment in Psychiatric Patients With Mood and Anxiety Disorders.

Authors:  Francis X Brennan; Kathryn R Gardner; Jay Lombard; Roy H Perlis; Maurizio Fava; Herbert W Harris; Rachel Scott
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2015-04-16

Review 3.  The potential utility of pharmacogenetic testing in psychiatry.

Authors:  Kathryn R Gardner; Francis X Brennan; Rachel Scott; Jay Lombard
Journal:  Psychiatry J       Date:  2014-12-17

4.  Distribution of CYP2D6 alleles and phenotypes in the Brazilian population.

Authors:  Deise C Friedrich; Júlia P Genro; Vinicius A Sortica; Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz; Maria Elizabete de Moraes; Sergio D J Pena; Andrea K Ribeiro dos Santos; Marco A Romano-Silva; Mara H Hutz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Combinatorial Versus Individual Gene Pharmacogenomic Testing in Mental Health: A Perspective on Context and Implications on Clinical Utility.

Authors:  Joel G Winner; Bryan Dechairo
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2015-11-24

6.  A Model Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Routine Genotyping for CYP2D6 among Older, Depressed Inpatients Starting Nortriptyline Pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Elizabeth J J Berm; Judith J Gout-Zwart; Jos Luttjeboer; Bob Wilffert; Maarten J Postma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  No Effect of Dose Adjustment to the CYP2D6 Genotype in Patients With Severe Mental Illness.

Authors:  Anne B Koopmans; David J Vinkers; Igmar T Poulina; Petra J A Gelan; Ron H N van Schaik; Hans W Hoek; Peter N van Harten
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Usefulness of Pharmacogenetic Analysis in Psychiatric Clinical Practice: A Case Report.

Authors:  Manuel A Franco-Martin; Francisco Sans; Belen García-Berrocal; Cristina Blanco; Carlos Llanes-Alvarez; María Isidoro-García
Journal:  Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.582

9.  A pharmacogenetic intervention for the improvement of the safety profile of antipsychotic treatments.

Authors:  Maria J Arranz; Alex Gonzalez-Rodriguez; Josefina Perez-Blanco; Rafael Penadés; Blanca Gutierrez; Laura Ibañez; Barbara Arias; Mercè Brunet; Jorge Cervilla; Juliana Salazar; Rosa Catalan
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 10.  Meta-analysis of probability estimates of worldwide variation of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19.

Authors:  Anne B Koopmans; Mario H Braakman; David J Vinkers; Hans W Hoek; Peter N van Harten
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 6.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.