Literature DB >> 23730754

Phase III of Wright's shifting balance process and the variance among demes in migration rate.

Michael J Wade1.   

Abstract

Interdemic selection by the differential migration of individuals out from demes of high fitness and into demes of low fitness (Phase III) is one of the most controversial aspects of Wright's Shifting Balance Theory. I derive a relationship between Phase III migration and the interdemic selection differential, S, and show its potential effect on FST . The relationship reveals a diversifying effect of interdemic selection by Phase III migration on the genetic structure of a metapopulation. Using experimental metapopulations, I explored the effect of Phase III migration on FST by comparing the genetic variance among demes for two different patterns of migration: (1) island model migration and (2) Wright's Phase III migration. Although mean migration rates were the same, I found that the variance among demes in migration rate was significantly higher with Phase III than with island model migration. As a result, FST for the frequency of a neutral marker locus was higher with Phase III than it was with island model migration. By increasing FST , Phase III enhanced the genetic differentiation among demes for traits not subject to interdemic selection. This feature makes Wright's process different from individual selection which, by reducing effective population size, decreases the genetic variance within demes for all other traits. I discussed this finding in relation to the efficacy of Phase III and random migration for effecting peak shifts, and the contribution of genes with indirect effects to among-deme variation.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23730754      PMCID: PMC3673033          DOI: 10.1111/evo.12088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST not equal to 1/(4Nm + 1).

Authors:  M C Whitlock; D E McCauley
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Differential migration from high fitness demes in the shining fungus beetle, Phalacrus substriatus.

Authors:  P K Ingvarsson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1931-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Adaptation and the evolution of parasite virulence in a connected world.

Authors:  Geoff Wild; Andy Gardner; Stuart A West
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Wright's shifting balance theory: an experimental study.

Authors:  M J Wade; C J Goodnight
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Populational heritability: empirical studies of evolution in metapopulations.

Authors:  M J Wade; J R Griesemer
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Linkage and the limits to natural selection.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.562

  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Applications of population genetics to animal breeding, from wright, fisher and lush to genomic prediction.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Quantifying the role of population subdivision in evolution on rugged fitness landscapes.

Authors:  Anne-Florence Bitbol; David J Schwab
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.