AIM: Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and double-bag continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) are the two current standard modalities of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Outcomes of these two modalities have not been well described. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective review was carried out to compare the treatment failure rate of APD and double-bag CAPD. Treatment failure was a combined endpoint including death and technique failure. Cox regression was used to compare risk (hazard ratio, HR) of treatment failure in APD and CAPD. RESULTS: There were 121 patients included in this study, 55 with APD and 66 with CAPD. APD patients had significantly lower risk of treatment failure (death and technique failure) than CAPD patients (HR 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.91, P=0.02). The lower risk of treatment failure in APD compared to CAPD was mainly caused by the significantly lower risk of technique failure (HR 0.30, 95%CI: 0.10-0.93, P=0.04). The mortality rates of the two modalities were not significantly different (HR 0.69, 95%CI: 0.42-1.12, P=0.13). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that APD may have lower risk of treatment failure compared with double-bag CAPD. These potential benefits of APD might justify the use of this modality despite its higher cost.
AIM: Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and double-bag continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) are the two current standard modalities of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Outcomes of these two modalities have not been well described. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective review was carried out to compare the treatment failure rate of APD and double-bag CAPD. Treatment failure was a combined endpoint including death and technique failure. Cox regression was used to compare risk (hazard ratio, HR) of treatment failure in APD and CAPD. RESULTS: There were 121 patients included in this study, 55 with APD and 66 with CAPD. APDpatients had significantly lower risk of treatment failure (death and technique failure) than CAPD patients (HR 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.91, P=0.02). The lower risk of treatment failure in APD compared to CAPD was mainly caused by the significantly lower risk of technique failure (HR 0.30, 95%CI: 0.10-0.93, P=0.04). The mortality rates of the two modalities were not significantly different (HR 0.69, 95%CI: 0.42-1.12, P=0.13). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that APD may have lower risk of treatment failure compared with double-bag CAPD. These potential benefits of APD might justify the use of this modality despite its higher cost.