Literature DB >> 23730731

Electrohysterography of labor contractions: propagation velocity and direction.

Eva Mikkelsen1, Peter Johansen, Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Niels Uldbjerg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Electrohysterographic assessment of the propagation velocity of uterine depolarization has been introduced as a promising predictor of preterm labor. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to characterize the uterine electrohysterographic signals during labor and to determine the propagation velocity and propagation direction of electrohysterographic signals.
DESIGN: Descriptive study.
SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. POPULATION: Eight women in active labor at term.
METHODS: Electrohysterograms (three channels) were recorded using surface electrodes placed abdominally along the vertical median axis with an inter-electrode distance of 6.5-11.2 cm. In total, 89 contractions were analyzed.
RESULTS: Electrohysterographic characteristics: The duration of the contractions was 61.0 ± 18.0 s (mean ± SD). The median frequency of the power spectrum density was 0.51 (0.44; 0.51) Hz (median; 10th; 90th percentile). The greatest signal magnitude was obtained by the electrode in the centermost position. The propagation velocity: 2.15 (0.66; 13.8) cm/s in the upper part and 1.53 (0.58; 6.7) cm/s in the lower part of the uterus. Propagation direction: Both downward (58%) and upward (42%) propagation of the electrohysterographic signals occurred. Moreover, downward and upward propagations were recorded simultaneously in the upper and lower part of the uterus, suggesting a multidirectional propagation pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: Labor contractions, expressed by electrohysterographic signals, propagate both in the downward and upward direction, a phenomenon that must be taken into account when determining the propagation velocity for preterm labor diagnostics.
© 2013 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Labor; electrohysterography; electromyography; physiology; power spectrum density; propagation velocity; uterine contractions

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23730731     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of Features between Multichannel Electrohysterogram for Differentiation of Labors.

Authors:  Yajun Zhang; Dongmei Hao; Lin Yang; Xiya Zhou; Yiyao Ye-Lin; Yimin Yang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Review and Study of Uterine Bioelectrical Waveforms and Vector Analysis to Identify Electrical and Mechanosensitive Transduction Control Mechanisms During Labor in Pregnant Patients.

Authors:  R E Garfield; Lauren Murphy; Kendra Gray; Bruce Towe
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.060

3.  Connectivity Measures of Uterine Activity using Magnetomyography.

Authors:  D Escalona-Vargas; M Zhang; A Nehorai; H Eswaran
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2018-07

4.  Biomathematical pattern of EMG signal propagation in smooth muscle of the non-pregnant porcine uterus.

Authors:  Malgorzata Domino; Bartosz Pawlinski; Zdzislaw Gajewski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Heterogeneous Graphical Granger Causality by Minimum Message Length.

Authors:  Kateřina Hlaváčková-Schindler; Claudia Plant
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.524

6.  Assessing Velocity and Directionality of Uterine Electrical Activity for Preterm Birth Prediction Using EHG Surface Records.

Authors:  Franc Jager; Ksenija Geršak; Paula Vouk; Žiga Pirnar; Andreja Trojner-Bregar; Miha Lučovnik; Ana Borovac
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Study protocol: PoPE-Prediction of Preterm delivery by Electrohysterography.

Authors:  Hinke de Lau; Chiara Rabotti; Herman P Oosterbaan; Massimo Mischi; Guid S Oei
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Velocity and directionality of the electrohysterographic signal propagation.

Authors:  Lasse Lange; Anders Vaeggemose; Preben Kidmose; Eva Mikkelsen; Niels Uldbjerg; Peter Johansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Characterizing the Propagation of Uterine Electrophysiological Signals Recorded with a Multi-Sensor Abdominal Array in Term Pregnancies.

Authors:  Diana Escalona-Vargas; Rathinaswamy B Govindan; Adrian Furdea; Pam Murphy; Curtis L Lowery; Hari Eswaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.