BACKGROUND: Multiple activating mutations of the signal- and repair pathway, such as BRAF-, KRAS-mutations and microsatellite instabilities are involved in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Molecular characterization of specifically locally advanced rectal cancers is scarce. Therefore the retrospective study addresses the intratumoral status of KRAS, BRAF and microsatellites loci with respect to tumor response and patients' antecedent including nicotine abusus, familial history, and health care to further molecularly identify rectal cancer patients. METHODS: The study assesses the molecular status of 50 rectal cancer samples (25 before and 25 after neoadjuvant 5-FU radiochemotherapy). KRAS and BRAF mutations were examined through two independent analytical methods (sequencing and SNaPshot) to ensure efficient mutation detection. The microsatellite analysis was conducted using a fluorescent multiplex PCR-based method. RESULTS: KRAS mutations were found in 9 of 25 (36%) rectal cancer patients and were not significantly associated with the response to therapy (P=0.577), age (P=0.249) or sex of the patient (P=0.566). No link exists between KRAS mutation status and nodal (P=0.371) or metastatic stage (P=0.216). For two patients, KRAS mutation status changed after application of neoadjuvant 5-FU radiochemotherapy. All tumor samples were diagnosed BRAF-negative. Two rectal cancer patients exhibited a MSI-H phenotype and showed no tumor response. CONCLUSIONS: So one can conclude that (I) KRAS mutations status may change after neoadjuvant 5-FU radiochemotherapy relevant for further therapeutic decisions; (II) MSI-H patients do not respond to neoadjuvant 5-FU radiochemotherapy. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results.
BACKGROUND: Multiple activating mutations of the signal- and repair pathway, such as BRAF-, KRAS-mutations and microsatellite instabilities are involved in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Molecular characterization of specifically locally advanced rectal cancers is scarce. Therefore the retrospective study addresses the intratumoral status of KRAS, BRAF and microsatellites loci with respect to tumor response and patients' antecedent including nicotine abusus, familial history, and health care to further molecularly identify rectal cancerpatients. METHODS: The study assesses the molecular status of 50 rectal cancer samples (25 before and 25 after neoadjuvant 5-FU radiochemotherapy). KRAS and BRAF mutations were examined through two independent analytical methods (sequencing and SNaPshot) to ensure efficient mutation detection. The microsatellite analysis was conducted using a fluorescent multiplex PCR-based method. RESULTS:KRAS mutations were found in 9 of 25 (36%) rectal cancerpatients and were not significantly associated with the response to therapy (P=0.577), age (P=0.249) or sex of the patient (P=0.566). No link exists between KRAS mutation status and nodal (P=0.371) or metastatic stage (P=0.216). For two patients, KRAS mutation status changed after application of neoadjuvant 5-FU radiochemotherapy. All tumor samples were diagnosed BRAF-negative. Two rectal cancerpatients exhibited a MSI-H phenotype and showed no tumor response. CONCLUSIONS: So one can conclude that (I) KRAS mutations status may change after neoadjuvant 5-FU radiochemotherapy relevant for further therapeutic decisions; (II) MSI-Hpatients do not respond to neoadjuvant 5-FU radiochemotherapy. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results.
Authors: Gillian Smith; Francis A Carey; Julie Beattie; Murray J V Wilkie; Tracy J Lightfoot; Jonathan Coxhead; R Colin Garner; Robert J C Steele; C Roland Wolf Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-07-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jochen Gaedcke; Marian Grade; Klaus Jung; Markus Schirmer; Peter Jo; Christoph Obermeyer; Hendrik A Wolff; Markus K Herrmann; Tim Beissbarth; Heinz Becker; Thomas Ried; Michael Ghadimi Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal Journal: Nature Date: 2002-06-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Carmen J Allegra; J Milburn Jessup; Mark R Somerfield; Stanley R Hamilton; Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Pamela K McAllister; Roscoe F Morton; Richard L Schilsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Peter Jo; Alexander König; Markus Schirmer; Julia Kitz; Lena-Christin Conradi; Azadeh Azizian; Markus Bernhardt; Hendrik A Wolff; Marian Grade; Michael Ghadimi; Philipp Ströbel; Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus; Jochen Gaedcke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 3.240