INTRODUCTION: The liability crisis may affect residency graduates' practice decisions, yet structured liability education during residency is still inadequate. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of medical liability on practice decisions and to evaluate the adequacy of current medical liability curricula. METHODS: All fourth-year residents (n = 1274) in 264 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited allopathic and 25 osteopathic US obstetrics and gynecology residency training programs were asked to participate in a survey about postgraduate plans and formal education during residency regarding liability issues in 2006. Programs were identified by the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology directory and the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists residency program registry. Outcome measures were the reported influence of liability/malpractice concerns on postresidency practice decision making and the incidence of formal education in liability/malpractice issues during residency. RESULTS: A total of 506 of 1274 respondents (39.7%) returned surveys. Women were more likely than men to report "region of the country" (P = .02) and "paid malpractice insurance as a salaried employee" (P = .03) as a major influence. Of the respondents, 123 (24.3%) planned fellowship training, and 229 (45.3%) were considering limiting practice. More than 20% had been named in a lawsuit. Respondents cited Pennsylvania, Florida, and New York as locations to avoid. In response to questions about medical liability education, 54.3% reported formal education on risk management, and 65.2% indicated they had not received training on "next steps" after a lawsuit. DISCUSSION: Residents identify liability-related issues as major influences when making choices about practice after training. Structured education on matters of medical liability during residency is still inadequate.
INTRODUCTION: The liability crisis may affect residency graduates' practice decisions, yet structured liability education during residency is still inadequate. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of medical liability on practice decisions and to evaluate the adequacy of current medical liability curricula. METHODS: All fourth-year residents (n = 1274) in 264 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited allopathic and 25 osteopathic US obstetrics and gynecology residency training programs were asked to participate in a survey about postgraduate plans and formal education during residency regarding liability issues in 2006. Programs were identified by the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology directory and the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists residency program registry. Outcome measures were the reported influence of liability/malpractice concerns on postresidency practice decision making and the incidence of formal education in liability/malpractice issues during residency. RESULTS: A total of 506 of 1274 respondents (39.7%) returned surveys. Women were more likely than men to report "region of the country" (P = .02) and "paid malpractice insurance as a salaried employee" (P = .03) as a major influence. Of the respondents, 123 (24.3%) planned fellowship training, and 229 (45.3%) were considering limiting practice. More than 20% had been named in a lawsuit. Respondents cited Pennsylvania, Florida, and New York as locations to avoid. In response to questions about medical liability education, 54.3% reported formal education on risk management, and 65.2% indicated they had not received training on "next steps" after a lawsuit. DISCUSSION: Residents identify liability-related issues as major influences when making choices about practice after training. Structured education on matters of medical liability during residency is still inadequate.
Authors: Thomas J Benedetti; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Susan M Skillman; C Holly A Andrilla; Elise Bowditch; Katherine Camacho Carr; Susan J Myers Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.661