INTRODUCTION: Rotavirus is the main cause of gastroenteritis in Canadian children younger than five years of age, resulting in significant morbidity and cost. The present study provides evidence on the cost effectiveness of two alternative rotavirus vaccinations (RotaTeq [Merck Frosst Canada Ltd, Canada] and Rotarix [GlaxoSmithKline, Canada]) available in Canada. METHODS: Analysis was conducted through a Markov model that followed a cohort of children from birth to five years of age. Analysis used pertinent data on the natural history of rotavirus and the effects of vaccination. Estimates of heath care costs for children requiring hospitalizations and emergency department visits were derived from the Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program, Active (IMPACT) surveillance, emergency department studies, as well as other Canadian studies. The model estimated the effect of vaccination on costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: The incremental cost per QALY gained from the health care system perspective was $122,000 for RotaTeq and $108,000 for Rotarix. From the societal perspective, both vaccination strategies were dominant - both cost saving and more effective. The cost-effectiveness of vaccination is dependent on the mode of administration, the perspective adopted and the cost of the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: From a societal perspective, a universal vaccination program against rotavirus will be both cost saving and more effective than no vaccination. Becasue the majority of rotavirus infections do not require emergency department visits or hospital admission, from a health care system perspective, a program would not be considered cost effective.
INTRODUCTION: Rotavirus is the main cause of gastroenteritis in Canadian children younger than five years of age, resulting in significant morbidity and cost. The present study provides evidence on the cost effectiveness of two alternative rotavirus vaccinations (RotaTeq [Merck Frosst Canada Ltd, Canada] and Rotarix [GlaxoSmithKline, Canada]) available in Canada. METHODS: Analysis was conducted through a Markov model that followed a cohort of children from birth to five years of age. Analysis used pertinent data on the natural history of rotavirus and the effects of vaccination. Estimates of heath care costs for children requiring hospitalizations and emergency department visits were derived from the Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program, Active (IMPACT) surveillance, emergency department studies, as well as other Canadian studies. The model estimated the effect of vaccination on costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: The incremental cost per QALY gained from the health care system perspective was $122,000 for RotaTeq and $108,000 for Rotarix. From the societal perspective, both vaccination strategies were dominant - both cost saving and more effective. The cost-effectiveness of vaccination is dependent on the mode of administration, the perspective adopted and the cost of the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: From a societal perspective, a universal vaccination program against rotavirus will be both cost saving and more effective than no vaccination. Becasue the majority of rotavirus infections do not require emergency department visits or hospital admission, from a health care system perspective, a program would not be considered cost effective.
Authors: Bélen Salinas; Irene Pérez Schael; Alexandre C Linhares; Guillermo M Ruiz Palacios; M Lourdes Guerrero; Juan Pablo Yarzábal; Yolanda Cervantes; SueAnn Costa Clemens; Silvia Damaso; Karin Hardt; Béatrice De Vos Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Timo Vesikari; Aino Karvonen; Leena Puustinen; Shang-Qin Zeng; Evelyn Dora Szakal; Andrée Delem; Beatrice De Vos Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: E Piednoir; K Bessaci; F Bureau-Chalot; P Sabouraud; V Brodard; L Andréoletti; O Bajolet Journal: J Hosp Infect Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Gillian A M Tarr; Xiao-Li Pang; Ran Zhuo; Bonita E Lee; Linda Chui; Samina Ali; Otto G Vanderkooi; Christine Michaels-Igbokwe; Phillip I Tarr; Shannon E MacDonald; Gillian Currie; Judy MacDonald; Kelly Kim; Stephen B Freedman Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2021-02-13 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Mitchell Zelman; Carolyn Sanford; Anne Neatby; Beth A Halperin; Donna MacDougall; Corinne Rowswell; Joanne M Langley; Scott A Halperin Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Sarah E Wilson; Laura C Rosella; Jun Wang; Nicole Le Saux; Natasha S Crowcroft; Tara Harris; Shelly Bolotin; Shelley L Deeks Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ayman Chit; Jason K H Lee; Minsup Shim; Van Hai Nguyen; Paul Grootendorst; Jianhong Wu; Robert Van Exan; Joanne M Langley Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Stephen B Freedman; Bonita E Lee; Marie Louie; Xiao-Li Pang; Samina Ali; Andy Chuck; Linda Chui; Gillian R Currie; James Dickinson; Steven J Drews; Mohamed Eltorki; Tim Graham; Xi Jiang; David W Johnson; James Kellner; Martin Lavoie; Judy MacDonald; Shannon MacDonald; Lawrence W Svenson; James Talbot; Phillip Tarr; Raymond Tellier; Otto G Vanderkooi Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 2.125