BACKGROUND: Dental visits represent an opportunity to identify and assist patients with unhealthy substance use, but little is known about how dentists are addressing patients' use of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drugs. The authors surveyed dentists to learn about the role their practices might play in providing substance-use screening and interventions. METHODS: The authors distributed a 41-item Web-based survey to all 210 dentists active in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning Network, a practice-based research network. The questionnaire assessed dental practices' policies and current practices, attitudes and perceived barriers to providing services for tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three dentists completed the survey (68 percent response rate). Although screening was common, fewer dentists reported that they were providing follow-up counseling or referrals for substance use. Insufficient knowledge or training was the most frequently cited barrier to intervention. Many dentists reported they would offer assistance for use of tobacco (67 percent) or alcohol or illicit drugs (52 percent) if reimbursed; respondents who treated publicly insured patients were more likely to reply that they would offer this assistance. CONCLUSIONS: Dentists recognize the importance of screening for substance use, but they lack the clinical training and practice-based systems focused on substance use that could facilitate intervention. Practical Implications. The results of this study indicate that dentists may be willing to address substance use among patients, including use of alcohol and illicit drugs in addition to tobacco, if barriers are reduced through changes in reimbursement, education and systems-level support.
BACKGROUND: Dental visits represent an opportunity to identify and assist patients with unhealthy substance use, but little is known about how dentists are addressing patients' use of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drugs. The authors surveyed dentists to learn about the role their practices might play in providing substance-use screening and interventions. METHODS: The authors distributed a 41-item Web-based survey to all 210 dentists active in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning Network, a practice-based research network. The questionnaire assessed dental practices' policies and current practices, attitudes and perceived barriers to providing services for tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three dentists completed the survey (68 percent response rate). Although screening was common, fewer dentists reported that they were providing follow-up counseling or referrals for substance use. Insufficient knowledge or training was the most frequently cited barrier to intervention. Many dentists reported they would offer assistance for use of tobacco (67 percent) or alcohol or illicit drugs (52 percent) if reimbursed; respondents who treated publicly insured patients were more likely to reply that they would offer this assistance. CONCLUSIONS: Dentists recognize the importance of screening for substance use, but they lack the clinical training and practice-based systems focused on substance use that could facilitate intervention. Practical Implications. The results of this study indicate that dentists may be willing to address substance use among patients, including use of alcohol and illicit drugs in addition to tobacco, if barriers are reduced through changes in reimbursement, education and systems-level support.
Entities:
Keywords:
Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning; Substance use; dental clinics; dental practice; tobacco-use cessation; tobacco-use interventions
Authors: Ian Needleman; Saman Warnakulasuriya; Gay Sutherland; Michael M Bornstein; Elias Casals; Thomas Dietrich; Jean Suvan Journal: Oral Health Prev Dent Date: 2006 Impact factor: 1.256
Authors: Judith S Gordon; Judy A Andrews; David A Albert; Karen M Crews; Thomas J Payne; Herbert H Severson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Bertha K Madras; Wilson M Compton; Deepa Avula; Tom Stegbauer; Jack B Stein; H Westley Clark Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2008-10-16 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Evelyn P Whitlock; Michael R Polen; Carla A Green; Tracy Orleans; Jonathan Klein Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-04-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Carrigan L Parish; Margaret R Pereyra; Harold A Pollack; Gabriel Cardenas; Pedro C Castellon; Stephen N Abel; Richard Singer; Lisa R Metsch Journal: Addiction Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Stephanie A S Staras; Yi Guo; Valeria V Gordan; Gregg H Gilbert; Deborah L McEdward; Douglas Manning; Jennifer Woodard; Elizabeth A Shenkman Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Jenna L McCauley; Renata S Leite; Valeria V Gordan; Roger B Fillingim; Gregg H Gilbert; Cyril Meyerowitz; David Cochran; D Brad Rindal; Kathleen T Brady Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Carrigan L Parish; Margaret R Pereyra; Stephen N Abel; Karolynn Siegel; Harold A Pollack; Lisa R Metsch Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Jenna L McCauley; Renata S Leite; Cathy L Melvin; Roger B Fillingim; Kathleen T Brady Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Debora C Matthews; Martha G S Brillant; Kudirat O Jimoh; Winston Singleton; Pamela McLean-Veysey; Ingrid Sketris Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2019-08-06
Authors: Deanna P Jannat-Khah; Jennifer McNeely; Margaret R Pereyra; Carrigan Parish; Harold A Pollack; Jamie Ostroff; Lisa Metsch; Donna R Shelley Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 2.830