Literature DB >> 23729356

Safety and one year outcomes following vaginally assisted laparoscopic uterine sacropexy (VALUES) for advanced uterine prolapse.

Abdalla M Fayyad1, Chrysostomos S Siozos.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the safety and outcomes of vaginally assisted laparoscopic uterine sacropexy (VALUES) as a surgical treatment for stage 3 and 4 uterine prolapse.
METHODS: Seventy consecutive women with stage 3 and 4 uterine prolapse who underwent VALUES over 2-year period were prospectively evaluated. Women filled the Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL), and underwent examination using pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) pre- and post-operatively. In addition, patients filled the patient global impression of improvement questionnaire post-operatively. Mesh related complications were evaluated post-operatively. Patients were followed up at 3 and 12 months following surgery. This study reports the 12 months outcomes.
RESULTS: Sixty-four women (91.4%) reported cure of their prolapse symptoms. On examination, 67 women (95.7%) had POP-Q stage 0 or 1 uterine support at 12 months. Six women needed further surgical intervention for prolapse (8.5%); three women developed recurrent uterine prolapse and three other women developed symptomatic recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse. The total vaginal length was not different between the pre- and post-operative periods. Two patients developed mesh related complications. Significant improvement was noted in prolapse symptoms and quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: VALUES is a safe and effective treatment for women with stage 3 and 4 uterine prolapse up to 12 months without the risk of vaginal shortening. Long-term results are needed to fully establish the value of this technique.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laparoscopy; sacrohysteropexy; uterine prolapse

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23729356     DOI: 10.1002/nau.22433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  4 in total

1.  Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Ethan M Balk; Danielle D Antosh; Cedric K Olivera; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Miles Murphy; Cara L Grimes; Ambereen Sleemi; Ruchira Singh; Alexis A Dieter; Catrina C Crisp; David D Rahn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Effect of pregnancy on uterine-sparing pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Tejumola M Adegoke; Olivera Vragovic; Christina Deck Yarrington; Jean-Robert Larrieux
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  A new operation technique for uterine prolapse: Vaginally-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy.

Authors:  İlhan Sanverdi; Çetin Kılıççı; Mesut Polat; Enis Özkaya; Sami Gökhan Kılıç; Merve Dizdar; Ateş Karateke
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-09-30

4.  Vaginal-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy with Vaginal Vault Suspension for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: 12-month Preliminary Results of a Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Huseyin Cengiz; Sukru Yildiz; Ismail Alay; Cihan Kaya; Ecem Eren; Derya Ece Iliman
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2021-01-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.