Literature DB >> 23728949

Moderate eugenics and human enhancement.

Michael J Selgelid1.   

Abstract

Though the reputation of eugenics has been tarnished by history, eugenics per se is not necessarily a bad thing. Many advocate a liberal new eugenics--where individuals are free to choose whether or not to employ genetic technologies for reproductive purposes. Though genetic interventions aimed at the prevention of severe genetic disorders may be morally and socially acceptable, reproductive liberty in the context of enhancement may conflict with equality. Enhancement could also have adverse effects on utility. The enhancement debate requires a shift in focus. What the equality and/or utility costs of enhancement will be is an empirical question. Rather than philosophical speculation, more social science research is needed to address it. Philosophers, meanwhile, should address head-on the question of how to strike a balance between liberty, equality, and utility in cases of conflict (in the context of genetics).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23728949     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-013-9485-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  5 in total

1.  Is better always good? The Enhancement Project.

Authors:  E Parens
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Moral uncertainty and the moral status of early human life.

Authors:  Michael J Selgelid
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2012-03

3.  Prenatal screening and its impact on persons with disabilities.

Authors:  D Kaplan
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.898

5.  Procreative beneficence and in vitro gametogenesis.

Authors:  Hannah Bourne; Thomas Douglas; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2012-09
  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  The enhancement debate.

Authors:  Bert Gordijn; Henk ten Have
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-02

2.  From species ethics to social concerns: Habermas's critique of "liberal eugenics" evaluated.

Authors:  Vilhjálmur Árnason
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2014-10

3.  The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators' interests.

Authors:  Giulia Cavaliere
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2020-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.