Literature DB >> 23728487

Improving technical information use: what can be learnt from a manager's perspective?

C Jacobson1, A Lisle, R W Carter, M T Hockings.   

Abstract

Conservation practice reportedly suffers from low use of technical information. Understanding of factors that affect the influence of technical information on management decision-making is limited. We sought to identify leverage points for improved technical information dissemination in the New South Wales Parks and Wildlife Service, Australia, given the significant recent investments in monitoring and evaluation that had been made. We did so by exploring the inter-relationships between factors affecting the influence of different information types on management decisions. Results indicate that managers have a high inclination toward adaptive behavior, given they operate in an information poor environment. The most influential types of information were those that enabled interaction between information provider and recipient (e.g., staff experience and expertise). An analysis of the concordance in individuals' responses for different information types showed that neither accessibility nor organizational expectation of use was aligned with influence on decision-making. Alignment of responses also varied by work area. Raising expectations of information use or increasing access to particular types of information is therefore unlikely to result in an increase in influence on management decision-making. Rather than focussing on matching accessibility and expected use of particular information types, our results indicate that technical information uptake is best supported through existing peer networks tailored to specific work areas.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23728487     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0084-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  7 in total

Review 1.  Moving from information transfer to information exchange in health and health care.

Authors:  Renée Gravois Lee; Theresa Garvin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management.

Authors:  Andrew S Pullin; Gavin B Stewart
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  The need for evidence-based conservation.

Authors:  William J Sutherland; Andrew S Pullin; Paul M Dolman; Teri M Knight
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Accountability, reporting, or management improvement? Development of a state of the parks assessment system in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Marc Hockings; Carly N Cook; R W Carter; Robyn James
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions.

Authors:  Carly N Cook; R W Bill Carter; Richard A Fuller; Marc Hockings
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.789

6.  Using Logic Analysis to Evaluate Knowledge Transfer Initiatives: The Case of the Research Collective on the Organization of Primary Care Services.

Authors:  Astrid Brousselle; Damien Contandriopoulos; Marc Lemire
Journal:  Evaluation (Lond)       Date:  2009-04

7.  Focusing Biodiversity Research on the Needs of Decision Makers

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.266

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  The User, not the Tool: Perceptions of Credibility and Relevance Affect the Uptake of Prioritisation.

Authors:  Milena Kiatkoski Kim; Louisa Evans; Lea M Scherl; Helene Marsh
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.266

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.