Literature DB >> 23728137

Online feedback assessments in physiology: effects on students' learning experiences and outcomes.

Nicole Y Marden1, Lesley G Ulman, Fiona S Wilson, Gary M Velan.   

Abstract

Online formative assessments have become increasingly popular; however, formal evidence supporting their educational benefits is limited. This study investigated the impact of online feedback quizzes on the learning experiences and outcomes of undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory physiology course. Four quiz models were tested, which differed in the amount of credit available, the number of attempts permitted, and whether the quizzes were invigilated or unsupervised, timed or untimed, or open or closed book. All quizzes were composed of multiple-choice questions and provided immediate individualized feedback. Summative end-of-course examination marks were analyzed with respect to performance in quizzes and were also compared with examination performance in the year before the quizzes were introduced. Online surveys were conducted to gather students' perceptions regarding the quizzes. The vast majority of students perceived online quizzes as a valuable learning tool. For all quiz models tested, there was a significant relationship between performance in quizzes and end-of-course examination scores. Importantly, students who performed poorly in quizzes were more likely to fail the examination, suggesting that formative online quizzes may be a useful tool to identify students in need of assistance. Of the four quiz models, only one quiz model was associated with a significant increase in mean examination performance. This model had the strongest formative focus, allowing multiple unsupervised and untimed attempts. This study suggests that the format of online formative assessments is critical in achieving the desired impact on student learning. Specifically, such assessments are most effective when they are low stakes.

Keywords:  feedback; formative assessment; learning outcomes; online assessment; summative assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23728137     DOI: 10.1152/advan.00092.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ        ISSN: 1043-4046            Impact factor:   2.288


  5 in total

1.  A proposal for undergraduate students' inclusion in brain awareness week: promoting interest in curricular neuroscience components.

Authors:  Alexandre Martins; Pâmela Billig Mello-Carpes
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2014-10-15

2.  Feasibility of radiology online structured oral examination for undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Fawaz Alharbi; Ali Alamer
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 3.  A review of web-based application of online learning in pathology and laboratory medicine.

Authors:  Cullen D Smith; Neel Atawala; Carolyn A Klatt; Edward C Klatt
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2022-08-09

4.  Considerations and strategies for effective online assessment with a focus on the biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Karen Mate; Judith Weidenhofer
Journal:  FASEB Bioadv       Date:  2021-10-25

5.  Use of digital teaching resources and predictors of medical student performance during the pandemic: A prospective study.

Authors:  Michelle Seer; Charlotte Kampsen; Tim Becker; Sebastian Hobert; Sven Anders; Tobias Raupach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.