Literature DB >> 23726663

Hyposialylated α1-acid glycoprotein inhibits phagocytosis of feline neutrophils.

G Rossi1, L Capitani, F Ceciliani, L Restelli, S Paltrinieri.   

Abstract

Feline α1-acid glycoprotein (fAGP) modifies both its serum concentration and its glycan moiety during diseases. fAGP is hyposialylated in cats with feline infectious peritonitis (FIP), but not in clinically healthy cats or in cats with other diseases. This study was aimed to determine whether hyposialylated fAGP influences phagocytosis. A flow cytometric method based on ingestion of fluoresceinated bacteria and adapted to feline blood was used to assess phagocytosis of leukocytes incubated with 'non-pathological' fAGP (purified from sera with normal concentrations of AGP) and 'pathological' fAGP (purified from sera with >1.5mg/mL hyposialylated AGP). The flow cytometric method provided repeatable results for neutrophils (coefficients of variations, CVs <15%) but not for monocytes (CVs>20%) which had also a high individual variability. Compared with saline solution and with non-pathological fAGP, pathological fAGP significantly decreased phagocytosis in neutrophils and monocytes. This study demonstrated that hyposialylated fAGP down-regulates the phagocytic activity of feline neutrophils.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feline; Feline infectious peritonitis; Flow cytometry; Phagocytosis; α-1-Acid glycoprotein

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23726663      PMCID: PMC7126313          DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Vet Sci        ISSN: 0034-5288            Impact factor:   2.534


Introduction

Feline α1-acid glycoprotein (fAGP) works as an acute phase protein in cats (Paltrinieri, 2008) and increases in the serum of cats with several inflammatory and non-inflammatory conditions (Paltrinieri et al., 2007b; Paltrinieri, 2008). The functions of AGP include the dampening of the inflammatory status to minimise tissue damages associated with the release of reactive oxygen species that characterizes the last phase of the phagocytic process of granulocytes and monocytes recruited in tissues during inflammation (Tilg et al., 1993, Atemezem et al., 2001, Hochepied et al., 2003, Miranda-Ribera et al., 2010). In addition to its serum concentration, post-translational glycosylation and phosphorylation of AGP can be modified during inflammation or diseases (Ceciliani and Pocacqua, 2007). The glycan moiety influences several immunomodulatory activities of AGP (Hochepied et al., 2003, Ceciliani and Pocacqua, 2007). Carbohydrate moiety modifications could be important in the inflammatory response but may also be responsible for impairment of innate defences by modifying phagocyte functions. Most of the experiments focusing on the relationship between the glycan moiety of AGP and its involvement in defensive responses were performed on experimentally desialylated AGP, due to the difficulties to retrieve a sufficient number of unhealthy animals (Ceciliani et al., 2007, Miranda-Ribera et al., 2010). In cats, hyposialylated AGP, in α(2-6)-linked and α(2-3)-linked sialic acid, has been found in feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) (Ceciliani et al., 2004). FIP is sustained by mutated viral variants of the feline coronavirus (FCoV) able to replicate into macrophages (Pedersen, 2009). The development of the disease depends on the immune response of the host (Pedersen, 1987), as suggested by the different number of lymphocytes and by the different concentration of molecules involved in inflammation or immunity found in cats with FIP compared with FCoV-infected, clinically healthy cats (Kipar et al., 2001, Berg et al., 2005, Gelain et al., 2006, Giordano and Paltrinieri, 2009). Hyposialylation seems to be a unique feature of FIP, since it does not occur in diseases other than FIP, except in a few cats infected by the feline leukemia virus (FeLV) or by the feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) (Pocacqua et al., 2005) or in clinically healthy FCoV-infected cats, which exhibit transient increases of hypersialylated fAGP (Giordano et al., 2004, Paltrinieri et al., 2007a). A relationship between the degree of sialylation of AGP and the clinical outcome of the infection can be hypothesised. Due to its involvement in down-regulating the inflammation, it is possible that the hyposialylation of AGP may increase the susceptibility of cats by altering the responses of phagocytes. The aim of the present study was to determine whether hyposialylated AGP purified from unhealthy cat interferes with phagocytic activity of feline granulocytes and monocytes. To fulfil this aim, we used a flow cytometric method previously employed in cats (Hoffmann-Jagielska et al., 2003, Hoffmann-Jagielska et al., 2006) to evaluate phagocytosis of fluoresceinated bacteria in whole blood.

Materials and methods

Animals and sample collection

Blood samples were taken from 16 clinically healthy client-owned cats under informed consent during routine wellness visits. Therefore, according to the regulations of our Institution, it was not necessary to obtain a formal authorisation by the Animal Care Committee. Blood was placed either in tubes with lithium heparin (15 U/mL), or in plain tubes and immediately transported to the laboratory to be analysed within 1 h. Specifically, anticoagulated blood was used to perform routine hematology and to assess phagocytic activity, while plain tubes were used to obtain serum by centrifugation to perform the biochemical analyses described below. The inclusion criterion was the absence of any clinical sign and of laboratory abnormalities in a routine laboratory hematological and biochemical screening. Specifically biochemical analyses were run on serum using an automated spectrophotometer (Cobas Mira, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) using reagents provided by Real Time S.r.l (Viterbo, Italy) by measuring the following analytes: total proteins (biuret method), albumin (bromochresol method), glucose (GOD-POD method), urea (urease method), creatinine (Jaffè method), alanine aminotransferase (ALT, kinetic IFCC method), aspartate aminotransferase (AST, kinetic IFCC method), alkaline phosphatase (ALP, kinetic IFCC method), cholesterol (COD-POD-PAP method), Triglycerides (GPO-POP-PAP method), calcium (orthocresoftaleine method), phosphate (phosphomolibdate method), γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT, kinetic IFCC method), creatine kinase (CK, CK-NAC method). The serum concentration of AGP was also measured using the method described below, and only cats with results within the reference intervals were enrolled in this study. Routine hematology was performed using an automated laser hematology analyzer (Sysmex XT-2000iV, Sysmex Co., Chuo-ku, Kobe, Japan), already validated for feline blood (Lilliehöök and Tvedten, 2009) equipped with a multispecies software for veterinary use, followed by micrscopical analysis of May Grunwald Giemsa stained blood smears to perform the differential leukocyte counts. Heparinized blood from the first 10 cats enrolled in the study was also used to optimize the flow cytometric method described below (cats 1–5) and to evaluate the precision of this method (cats 6–10). As regards the leukocyte populations of interest for this study, differential cell counts of these cats were normal (4.52 ± 2.02 neutrophils × 103/μL; 2.86 ± 1.08 lymphocytes × 103/μL and 0.20 ± 0.07 monocytes × 103/μL). Then, additional six heparinized samples (cats 11–16) were used to assess the phagocytic responses in the presence of fAGP. Blood was placed in tubes with lithium heparin, transported to the laboratory and analysed within 1 h. Differential cell counts from blood of these cats were normal (5.27 ± 3.10 neutrophils × 103/μL; 3.02 ± 1.57 lymphocytes × 103/μL and 0.23 ± 0.11 monocytes × 103/μL).

Evaluation of phagocytic activity

Phagocytic activity was assayed in heparinised whole blood using a commercial kit (Phagotest, Glycotope Biotechnology) based on the incubation of blood with fluoresceinated (fluorescein isothiocyanate, FITC-labelled) Escherichia coli, followed by flow cytometric quantification of phagocytosis. Aliquots of 100 μL blood were prepared to assess in duplicate either non-activated phagocytosis (basal phagocytic activity of resting cells incubated on ice) or activated phagocytosis (phagocytic activity of cells incubated for 10 min in a water bath at 37 °C followed by rapid blocking of phagocytosis by immersion on ice). Before incubation, each aliquot was mixed with different amounts (see below) of FITC-labelled E. coli. After incubation, a quenching solution (100 μL) was added to inactivate the fluorescence of non-phagocytosed E. coli. Cell suspensions were washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at 4 °C, centrifuged (5 min, 250g, 4 °C) and mixed with the lysing solution provided in the kit. After 5 min, cells were washed again and 200 μL DNA staining solution was added, followed by incubation on ice for 10 min. Phagocytosis was assessed at 488 nm wavelength using a flow cytometer (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson) equipped with the CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson) by analyzing a volume of blood containing 10,000 cells in the gate of neutrophils and monocytes were gated on dot plots of side scatter (SSC) and forward scatter (FSC) analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1). These gates were designed during a previous study (Paltrinieri et al., 2012) based on cell distribution assessed using monoclonal antibodies against each leukocyte population. To exclude artifacts due to the residual fluorescence of aggregates of E. coli the intensity of positivity of DNA staining was assessed on histograms of the gated population to differentiate aploid bacteria from diploid nucleated cells. Diploid cells were back-gated to evaluate phagocytosis: two histograms (neutrophils and monocytes) were generated and data were expressed as percentage of phagocytosing cells and as median channel fluorescence (MCF) emitted by the cells. The MCF is proportional to the amount of ingested bacteria per cell. Data were recorded on a logarithmic scale and values of non-activated samples were subtracted from those of activated samples to determine the percentage of phagocytic cells and the MCF of each sample. Different concentrations of E. coli were tested in preliminary assays. In the first test, 20 μL E. coli suspension (1 × 109   E. coli/mL) were added to each aliquot of blood. Further tests were performed using 10 μL, 5 μL and 2.5 μL E. coli suspension. Intra-assay precision was assessed on duplicate measurement of five samples analysed using the optimised method by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV = mean/standard deviation × 100).

Purification of fAGP from pooled sera and evaluation of the pattern of sialylation

Feline AGP was purified from two pools of feline sera received at our institution for routine diagnostic investigation and stored at −20 °C for a maximum of 6 months. The concentration of AGP was assessed at admission using a single radial immunodiffusion (SRID) kit (Feline a1AG Plate, Tridelta) (Paltrinieri et al., 2007a). Sera were pooled based on their AGP concentration. Forty-six samples from cats with a clinical suspicion of FIP and serum AGP concentrations >1.5 mg/mL (total volume 20.9 mL) were included in the ‘pathological pool’. Fifty-nine sera (total volume 29.9 mL) from clinically healthy cats with serum AGP concentrations <0.5 mg/mL were used to form the ‘non-pathological pool’, since this value is within the reference interval of our laboratory (<0.56 mg/mL). The concentrations of AGP assessed by SRID were 0.42 mg/mL in the non-pathological pool and 3.84 mg/mL in the pathological pool. Feline AGP was purified from both the pools as described previously (Ceciliani et al., 2004), with the addition of a third reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) purification step to remove contaminants such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which might interfere with in vitro experiments with cells. This additional step completely remove LPS from the purified protein, as demonstrated using the LAL test in a previous study (Ceciliani et al., 2007). Protein peaks recorded at each chromatographic step are reported in the Supplementary Fig. 2). After each step of the purification protocol, protein concentrations were quantified by spectrophotometric measurement at 280 nm and fAGP concentrations were determined by SRID. The presence of fAGP in the purified protein fractions was assessed by Western blot analysis using an anti-fAGP polyclonal antibody raised in sheep kindly provided by Professor David Eckersall (University of Glasgow, UK) and an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-sheep secondary antibody. Western blots were developed using the Amplified AP Immun-Blot Kit (Bio-Rad). AGP sialylation was characterised in a further Western blotting experiment using the biotin-conjugated lectins Sambucus nigra agglutinin (SNAI, 2 μg/mL; Vector Laboratories) and Maackia amurensis agglutinin (MAA, 5 μg/mL; Vector Laboratories) specific for sialic acid α(2-6)-linked and α(2-3)-linked to galactose, respectively. Glycan analysis of fAGP-lectins binding was performed following a peroxidase reaction using the Vectastain ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories) as described previously (Ceciliani et al., 2004) and developed using the HRP Immun-Blot Assay Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Pathological and non-pathological AGP were analysed in the same blot. Densitometric analysis was then performed using the Imagemaster 1D software (Amersham Biosciences) that analysed digital images of the membranes acquired with a scanner in order to display profile plots of fAGP peaks and to calculate the area under each peak.

Effects of fAGP on the phagocytic activity of feline leucocytes

The effect of fAGP on phagocytosis was assessed on blood from six clinically healthy cats with AGP concentration ranging from 0.24 to 0.31 mg/mL. Samples were divided in six aliquots (200 μL each) that were added with 30 μL of the following solutions: (1) saline solution, to be placed on ice after incubation (non-activated negative control); (2) saline solution to activate phagocytosis as described above (activated negative control: baseline phagocytosis); (3) albumin, to evaluate the effect on phagocytosis of a non-specific protein (i.e. non-AGP); (4) ‘non-pathological fAGP’, prepared as described above; (5) AGP from clinically healthy cattle (Ceciliani et al., 2007): bovine AGP (bAGP) served to test the effect on phagocytosis of a AGP from a species other than cats; and (6) ‘pathological fAGP’, prepared as described above. The final protein concentration in wells 3–6 was 1.5 mg/mL. The 6 aliquots of blood added with saline solution or with the proteins listed above, were used to assess the phagocytic activity in duplicate. To this aim each aliquot was used to fill two wells of a microtitre plate (100 μL each). The plate was then incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After incubation, blood from each well was used to assess phagocytosis using the optimised protocol described above.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using an Excel spreadsheet with the Analyse-it set of macroinstructions (Analyse-it Software, version 2.21). Non parametric analyses were used since a Kolgomorov Smirnov normality test demonstrated that data did not have a normal distribution. Results recorded after incubation in the different experimental conditions were compared to each other with the Friedmann test. Results obtained with each protein were then compared with those obtained with saline solution with a Wilcoxon signed rank paired t test. The same test was used to compare the results obtained with non pathological feline AGP and those obtained with pathological feline AGP or bovine AGP. Values were considered to be significant when P  < 0.05.

Results

Optimisation of the protocol to evaluate phagocytosis of feline leukocytes

The application of the manufacturer’s protocol demonstrated that the signal exceeded the maximum visible fluorescence (Supplementary Fig. 3). Conversely, fluorescence histograms were completely visible using 5 μL or 2.5 μL E. coli suspension containing respectively 2.5 × 108 and 1.25 × 108   E. coli/mL. The former dilution (5 μL) was finally selected, since an excess of bacteria is needed to not underestimate phagocytic activity. At this dilution, the FSC vs. SSC plot showed that most of the phagocytic cells were neutrophils and monocytes, although a residual non-specific signal was found on lymphocytes. Histograms of gated neutrophils and monocytes demonstrated a moderate background signal in non-activated cells (Fig. 1 a and c; Table 1 ) and a strong positive signal in activated neutrophils. Positivity was less intense for activated monocytes, which also showed a high individual variability (Fig. 1c and d; Table 1). Intra-assay imprecision of the modified method was high in non-activated samples (Supplementary Table 1) and low (CVs < 15%) in activated samples, although individual cases had CVs > 20% (especially for monocytes).
Fig. 1

Examples of histograms obtained in non-activated neutrophils (A), activated neutrophils (B), non-activated monocytes (C) and activated monocytes (D). The gate designed in the non-activated population to identify the percentage of non-specific phagocytosis is indicated with ‘M1’. The comparisons of histograms A and C with those in B and D, respectively demonstrates the increased fluorescence obtained after stimulation compared with non-activated cells (i.e. cells kept on ice to block phagocytosis), detectable as a peak in the M1 area, that is not present in non activated cells.

Table 1

Results obtained in five clinically healthy cats using the optimised flow cytometric method.

Non-activatedActivatedDifference
Mean ± SD (median) Min–MaxMean ± SD (median) Min–MaxMean ± SD (median) Min–Max
% PMN0.8 ± 0.2 (0.9) 0.5–1.075.6 ± 9.3 (70.7) 67.2–89.974.7 ± 9.2 (70.2) 66.3–88.9
MCF PMN1.1 ± 0.1 (1.0) 1.0–1.2614.6 ± 79.3 (578.5) 545–709613.6 ± 79.3 (577.5) 544–708
% Mono10.6 ± 8.1 (7.8) 2.5–20.839.1 ± 15.8 (37.3) 17.5–55.328.5 ± 9.9 (34.5) 13.1–36.3
MCF Mono14.5 ± 19.8 (8.0) 1.0–48.5147.3 ± 116.8 (103.5) 47.0–344.5132.8 ± 113.1 (102.5) 46.0–330.5

SD, standard deviation; Min, minimum; Max, maximum;% PMN, percentage of phagocytic neutrophils; MCF PMN, median channel fluorescence intensity of neutrophils;% Mono, percentage of phagocytic monocytes; MCF PMN, median channel fluorescence intensity of monocytes.

Examples of histograms obtained in non-activated neutrophils (A), activated neutrophils (B), non-activated monocytes (C) and activated monocytes (D). The gate designed in the non-activated population to identify the percentage of non-specific phagocytosis is indicated with ‘M1’. The comparisons of histograms A and C with those in B and D, respectively demonstrates the increased fluorescence obtained after stimulation compared with non-activated cells (i.e. cells kept on ice to block phagocytosis), detectable as a peak in the M1 area, that is not present in non activated cells. Results obtained in five clinically healthy cats using the optimised flow cytometric method. SD, standard deviation; Min, minimum; Max, maximum;% PMN, percentage of phagocytic neutrophils; MCF PMN, median channel fluorescence intensity of neutrophils;% Mono, percentage of phagocytic monocytes; MCF PMN, median channel fluorescence intensity of monocytes.

Purification of AGP

After purification, 0.66 mg non-pathological fAGP and 2.20 mg pathological fAGP were recovered. Coomassie blue staining confirmed that AGP was purified to homogeneity and Western blot analysis confirmed that the purified protein was AGP in both samples (Supplementary Fig. 5). The densitometric analysis of the glycosylation patterns of non-pathological and pathological fAGP (Fig. 2 ) revealed that, compared with non-pathological AGP, the sialic acid α(2-6)-linked content of pathological fAGP (lectin SNAI) decreased to 63% and the sialic acid α(2-3)-linked to galactose (lectin MAA) decreased to 42%. These results confirmed that pathological fAGP was hyposialylated.
Fig. 2

Western blot analysis of non-pathological (NP) and pathological (P) fAGP stained with the lectins Sambucus nigra agglutinin (SNAI) and Maackia amurensis agglutinin (MAA) that are specific for sialic acid α2-6)-linked and α2-3)-linked to galactose, respectively. In Western blots for both lectins (A), each lane was loaded with 2 μg purified protein. Non-pathological protein reacts strongly with both lectins when compared with the pathological protein. The signal recorded with the two lectins in the pathological pool is weak. For each lectin, the reactivity with SNAI and MAAI has been quantified by a densitometry and the quantification of the area under the peaks (B) confirms that for both lectins, the value corresponding to pathological fAGP is lower than that of non pathological fAGP.

Western blot analysis of non-pathological (NP) and pathological (P) fAGP stained with the lectins Sambucus nigra agglutinin (SNAI) and Maackia amurensis agglutinin (MAA) that are specific for sialic acid α2-6)-linked and α2-3)-linked to galactose, respectively. In Western blots for both lectins (A), each lane was loaded with 2 μg purified protein. Non-pathological protein reacts strongly with both lectins when compared with the pathological protein. The signal recorded with the two lectins in the pathological pool is weak. For each lectin, the reactivity with SNAI and MAAI has been quantified by a densitometry and the quantification of the area under the peaks (B) confirms that for both lectins, the value corresponding to pathological fAGP is lower than that of non pathological fAGP.

Effect of AGP on phagocytosis of feline phagocytes

Results recorded in controls and in the presence of fAGP or other proteins are summarised in Fig. 3 . Pathological fAGP decreased in all the four flow cytometric parameters either compared with saline solution or compared with non-pathological fAGP. A significant decrease of phagocytosing monocytes compared with saline solution was induced by bAGP. No other significant differences were found, but non-pathological fAGP had a strong individual variability, due to a single cat that had extremely low values, and monocytes had a wide individual variability for almost all the parameters. The inhibitory activity on neutrophils was AGP-specific, since the same concentration of other proteins was ineffective.
Fig. 3

Results obtained after incubation of whole blood with saline solution (Neg), bovine albumin (Alb), non-pathological feline AGP (fAGP-NP), bovine AGP (bAGP) and pathological feline AGP (fAGP-P). The four graphs display the percentage of phagocytosing neutrophils (A), the median channel fluorescence (MCF) of neutrophils (B), the percentage of phagocytosing monocytes (C) and the MCF of monocytes (D). The boxes indicates the I–III interquartile range (IQR), the horizontal line indicates the median values, whiskers extend to further observation within the I quartile minus 1.5 ∗ IQR or to further observation within the III quartile plus 1.5 ∗ IQR. Asterisks indicate values that are significantly different from the negative control (saline solution) and the symbols † indicate values that are significantly different from non pathological fAGP: as regards neutrophils, both the percentage of the phagocytic cells and the MCF were significantly lower after incubation with pathological fAGP compared with controls and with non pathological fAGP. Conversely, as regards monocytes, the percentage of the phagocytic cells and the MCF were significantly lower after incubation with pathological fAGP compared with controls and with non-pathological fAGP. The incubation with bovine AGP induced a significant decrease of the percentage of the phagocytic cells only compared with controls but not with non-pathological fAGP.

Results obtained after incubation of whole blood with saline solution (Neg), bovine albumin (Alb), non-pathological feline AGP (fAGP-NP), bovine AGP (bAGP) and pathological feline AGP (fAGP-P). The four graphs display the percentage of phagocytosing neutrophils (A), the median channel fluorescence (MCF) of neutrophils (B), the percentage of phagocytosing monocytes (C) and the MCF of monocytes (D). The boxes indicates the I–III interquartile range (IQR), the horizontal line indicates the median values, whiskers extend to further observation within the I quartile minus 1.5 ∗ IQR or to further observation within the III quartile plus 1.5 ∗ IQR. Asterisks indicate values that are significantly different from the negative control (saline solution) and the symbols † indicate values that are significantly different from non pathological fAGP: as regards neutrophils, both the percentage of the phagocytic cells and the MCF were significantly lower after incubation with pathological fAGP compared with controls and with non pathological fAGP. Conversely, as regards monocytes, the percentage of the phagocytic cells and the MCF were significantly lower after incubation with pathological fAGP compared with controls and with non-pathological fAGP. The incubation with bovine AGP induced a significant decrease of the percentage of the phagocytic cells only compared with controls but not with non-pathological fAGP.

Discussion

This study demonstrated that hyposialylated fAGP purified from unhealthy cats can interfere with phagocytosis. The phagocytic activity of feline neutrophils and monocytes was determined by a flow cytometric protocol that copes with the need to work with low volumes of blood, as frequently occurs in cats, and provides the opportunity to work with whole blood, which paints a more reliable picture of cell–cell interactions that occur in blood. The main limitation of tests performed in whole blood is that other substance in plasma (cytokines, pro-inflammatory molecules, or even endogenous AGP) may interfere with cell responses. The study design adopted in this study, however, minimized the possible influence of endogenous substances since on one side all the cats were clinically healthy and have a normal concentration of AGP, and on the other side an aliquot of whole blood was incubated with saline solution. Therefore, the only difference between this aliquot and activated aliquots was the amount (and, as regards fAGP, the type of sialylation) of activator(s). Therefore, it is very likely that the different responses recorded after incubation with AGP or albumin actually depend on the presence of activators rather than on endogenous molecules. This or similar methods were already been employed in cats, (Hoffmann-Jagielska et al., 2003, Hoffmann-Jagielska et al., 2006, Hanel et al., 2003, Chen et al., 2006, Jaso-Friedmann et al., 2008, Craig et al., 2009, Webb et al., 2009, Keegan and Webb, 2010). However, the methods cited above were not specifically customed for feline cells. A preliminary step of optimisation to feline blood was therefore carried out, followed by the evaluation of imprecision. This approach allowed us to improve the quality of the signal by decreasing the number of E. coli added to cell suspensions, likely due to a decreased non specific binding of bacteria to cell surfaces. The residual positivity on lymphocytes, possibly due to non-specific adherence of bacteria or to the low phagocytic activity of lymphocytes (Tizard, 2009, Parra et al., 2012) did not influence the interpretation of neutrophil and monocyte, since the phagocytic activity of these cells was evaluated on gated cell populations that do not contain lymphocytes (Paltrinieri et al., 2012). Using the optimized method, intra-assay imprecision was higher in non-activated cells, as expected for datasets with low mean values (Westgard, 2003), but acceptable in activated cells, with CVs comparable to those reported previously (Hoffmann-Jagielska et al., 2003). Neutrophils had a higher phagocytic activity than monocytes, since phagocytosis of monocytes must be activated by cytokines (Netea et al., 2008, Tizard, 2009). Results of monocytes were also biased by the high imprecision and individual variability. In the second part of the experiment, we determined the phagocytosis-modulatory activity of fAGP by incubating feline blood with AGP purified from healthy and unhealthy animals. This study was not focused to assess the phagocytic responses of cats with FIP. Nevertheless, AGP purified from sick cats was strongly hyposialylated for both α(2-3)-linked and α(2-6)-linked sialic acid, with a magnitude similar to that found in cats with FIP (Ceciliani et al., 2004). This finding, coupled with the high AGP concentration in sera from sick animals, which is also consistent with FIP (Duthie et al., 1997), suggests that, although the clinical diagnosis of FIP was not confirmed post-mortem, it is very likely that most of the pathological sera came from FIP affected cats. The last step of purification (RP-HPLC) that removes contaminating LPS reduced the purification yield, as already reported (Ceciliani et al., 2007). By consequence, the amount of purified AGP was sufficient only for a limited number of replicas. In spite of this limitation, the pathological and strongly hyposialylated fAGP down-regulated phagocytosis of neutrophils and, to a lesser extent, of monocytes, when added at concentrations similar to those found in FIP. The high variability of monocytes depends on the intrinsic variability of their responses, potentially amplified by the low number of cats tested, rather than on a true effect of AGP. The possible influence of subclinical conditions was also unlikely since the cats were clinically and clinico-pathologically healthy. In humans and cattle, AGP modulates monocyte and neutrophil functions (Vasson et al., 1994, Lecchi et al., 2008, Rinaldi et al., 2008, Miranda-Ribera et al., 2010). AGP interacts with target cells through its glycan moiety, and the experimental desialylation inhibits immunomodulatory activities such as the apoptosis protecting function (Ceciliani et al., 2007) and the degranulatory inhibitory activity (Miranda-Ribera et al., 2010). The finding that hyposialylated fAGP purified from unhealthy cats can down-regulate phagocytosis is remarkable and gives some insight in the relationship between the sialylation degree of AGP and the modulation of its functions during diseases where post-translational modifications of the proteins occur. The results of this study do not allow us to formulate any hypothesis on the mechanism(s) responsible for this finding. Hyposialylation has been found to be specific in FIP, but not in clinically healthy, FCoV infected cats (Ceciliani et al., 2004, Paltrinieri et al., 2008). Although previous report, performed with methods different from those reported in this study, suggested that phagocytosis is not suppressed in cats wit FIP (Knotek et al., 2000), the hyposialylation of fAGP, which we found to down-regulate phagocytosis, may influence the clinical outcome of FCoV infection by inducing a failure of cellular responses to the virus. Macrophages and neutrophils are involved in FIP immunopathology, being the most abundant, while hardly effective, populations in pyogranulomatous lesions (Kipar et al., 1998, Paltrinieri et al., 1998). It would be interesting to investigate whether other cell-mediated functions are hampered by desialylated fAGP. Among these, the potential of AGP of modulate apoptosis through variations in the glycan moiety (Williams et al., 1997, De Vries et al., 2004, Kagaya et al., 2005, Ceciliani et al., 2007) could be interesting, since lymphocyte apoptosis occurs in cats with FIP (Takano et al., 2007), but not in FCoV-infected, clinically healthy cats (Paltrinieri et al., 2003). In conclusion, using a modified flow cytometric method to evaluate phagocytosis in feline whole blood, hyposialylated fAGP down-regulated neutrophil phagocytosis, thus supporting the hypothesis that post-translational modifications of AGP contributes to the pathogenesis of diseases involving cell-mediated responses, such as FIP (Ceciliani et al., 2004). Further experiments on the phagocytic activity in FIP affected cats are envisaged to confirm this hypothesis.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors of this paper has a financial or personal relationship with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.
  41 in total

1.  Neutrophil function and plasma opsonic capacity in colostrum-fed and colostrum-deprived neonatal kittens.

Authors:  Rita M Hanel; P Cynda Crawford; Jorge Hernandez; Neal A Benson; Julie K Levy
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.156

2.  Type IV hypersensitivity in the pathogenesis of FIPV-induced lesions.

Authors:  S Paltrinieri; M Cammarata Parodi; G Cammarata; M Mambretti
Journal:  Zentralbl Veterinarmed B       Date:  1998-04

3.  Value of alpha 1-acid glycoprotein in the diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis.

Authors:  S Duthie; P D Eckersall; D D Addie; C E Lawrence; O Jarrett
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1997-09-20       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  alpha 1-Acid glycoprotein reduces local and remote injuries after intestinal ischemia in the rat.

Authors:  J P Williams; M R Weiser; T T Pechet; L Kobzik; F D Moore; H B Hechtman
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1997-11

5.  In vitro evaluation of the effect of a novel immunosuppressive agent, FTY720, on the function of feline neutrophils.

Authors:  Yi-Je Chen; Andrew E Kyles; Clare R Gregory
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.156

6.  Suppression of cell death in primary rat hepatocytes by alpha1-acid glycoprotein.

Authors:  Noritaka Kagaya; Akiko Kamiyoshi; Yoh-Ichi Tagawa; Soichiro Akamatsu; Katsuhiro Isoda; Masaya Kawase; Kiyohito Yagi
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Down-regulatory effect of alpha 1-acid glycoprotein on bovine neutrophil degranulation.

Authors:  Alba Miranda-Ribera; Cristina Lecchi; Valerio Bronzo; Licia Scaccabarozzi; Paola Sartorelli; Federica Franciosi; Fabrizio Ceciliani
Journal:  Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.268

8.  Shifts in circulating lymphocyte subsets in cats with feline infectious peritonitis (FIP): pathogenic role and diagnostic relevance.

Authors:  Saverio Paltrinieri; Wilma Ponti; Stefano Comazzi; Alessia Giordano; Giorgio Poli
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 2.046

9.  Cellular composition, coronavirus antigen expression and production of specific antibodies in lesions in feline infectious peritonitis.

Authors:  A Kipar; S Bellmann; J Kremendahl; K Köhler; M Reinacher
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1998-10-23       Impact factor: 2.046

10.  Decreased sialylation of the acute phase protein alpha1-acid glycoprotein in feline infectious peritonitis (FIP).

Authors:  Fabrizio Ceciliani; Claudia Grossi; Alessia Giordano; Vanessa Pocacqua; Saverio Paltrinieri
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.046

View more
  6 in total

1.  Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies.

Authors:  Andrea Cossarizza; Hyun-Dong Chang; Andreas Radbruch; Mübeccel Akdis; Immanuel Andrä; Francesco Annunziato; Petra Bacher; Vincenzo Barnaba; Luca Battistini; Wolfgang M Bauer; Sabine Baumgart; Burkhard Becher; Wolfgang Beisker; Claudia Berek; Alfonso Blanco; Giovanna Borsellino; Philip E Boulais; Ryan R Brinkman; Martin Büscher; Dirk H Busch; Timothy P Bushnell; Xuetao Cao; Andrea Cavani; Pratip K Chattopadhyay; Qingyu Cheng; Sue Chow; Mario Clerici; Anne Cooke; Antonio Cosma; Lorenzo Cosmi; Ana Cumano; Van Duc Dang; Derek Davies; Sara De Biasi; Genny Del Zotto; Silvia Della Bella; Paolo Dellabona; Günnur Deniz; Mark Dessing; Andreas Diefenbach; James Di Santo; Francesco Dieli; Andreas Dolf; Vera S Donnenberg; Thomas Dörner; Götz R A Ehrhardt; Elmar Endl; Pablo Engel; Britta Engelhardt; Charlotte Esser; Bart Everts; Anita Dreher; Christine S Falk; Todd A Fehniger; Andrew Filby; Simon Fillatreau; Marie Follo; Irmgard Förster; John Foster; Gemma A Foulds; Paul S Frenette; David Galbraith; Natalio Garbi; Maria Dolores García-Godoy; Jens Geginat; Kamran Ghoreschi; Lara Gibellini; Christoph Goettlinger; Carl S Goodyear; Andrea Gori; Jane Grogan; Mor Gross; Andreas Grützkau; Daryl Grummitt; Jonas Hahn; Quirin Hammer; Anja E Hauser; David L Haviland; David Hedley; Guadalupe Herrera; Martin Herrmann; Falk Hiepe; Tristan Holland; Pleun Hombrink; Jessica P Houston; Bimba F Hoyer; Bo Huang; Christopher A Hunter; Anna Iannone; Hans-Martin Jäck; Beatriz Jávega; Stipan Jonjic; Kerstin Juelke; Steffen Jung; Toralf Kaiser; Tomas Kalina; Baerbel Keller; Srijit Khan; Deborah Kienhöfer; Thomas Kroneis; Désirée Kunkel; Christian Kurts; Pia Kvistborg; Joanne Lannigan; Olivier Lantz; Anis Larbi; Salome LeibundGut-Landmann; Michael D Leipold; Megan K Levings; Virginia Litwin; Yanling Liu; Michael Lohoff; Giovanna Lombardi; Lilly Lopez; Amy Lovett-Racke; Erik Lubberts; Burkhard Ludewig; Enrico Lugli; Holden T Maecker; Glòria Martrus; Giuseppe Matarese; Christian Maueröder; Mairi McGrath; Iain McInnes; Henrik E Mei; Fritz Melchers; Susanne Melzer; Dirk Mielenz; Kingston Mills; David Mirrer; Jenny Mjösberg; Jonni Moore; Barry Moran; Alessandro Moretta; Lorenzo Moretta; Tim R Mosmann; Susann Müller; Werner Müller; Christian Münz; Gabriele Multhoff; Luis Enrique Munoz; Kenneth M Murphy; Toshinori Nakayama; Milena Nasi; Christine Neudörfl; John Nolan; Sussan Nourshargh; José-Enrique O'Connor; Wenjun Ouyang; Annette Oxenius; Raghav Palankar; Isabel Panse; Pärt Peterson; Christian Peth; Jordi Petriz; Daisy Philips; Winfried Pickl; Silvia Piconese; Marcello Pinti; A Graham Pockley; Malgorzata Justyna Podolska; Carlo Pucillo; Sally A Quataert; Timothy R D J Radstake; Bartek Rajwa; Jonathan A Rebhahn; Diether Recktenwald; Ester B M Remmerswaal; Katy Rezvani; Laura G Rico; J Paul Robinson; Chiara Romagnani; Anna Rubartelli; Beate Ruckert; Jürgen Ruland; Shimon Sakaguchi; Francisco Sala-de-Oyanguren; Yvonne Samstag; Sharon Sanderson; Birgit Sawitzki; Alexander Scheffold; Matthias Schiemann; Frank Schildberg; Esther Schimisky; Stephan A Schmid; Steffen Schmitt; Kilian Schober; Thomas Schüler; Axel Ronald Schulz; Ton Schumacher; Cristiano Scotta; T Vincent Shankey; Anat Shemer; Anna-Katharina Simon; Josef Spidlen; Alan M Stall; Regina Stark; Christina Stehle; Merle Stein; Tobit Steinmetz; Hannes Stockinger; Yousuke Takahama; Attila Tarnok; ZhiGang Tian; Gergely Toldi; Julia Tornack; Elisabetta Traggiai; Joe Trotter; Henning Ulrich; Marlous van der Braber; René A W van Lier; Marc Veldhoen; Salvador Vento-Asturias; Paulo Vieira; David Voehringer; Hans-Dieter Volk; Konrad von Volkmann; Ari Waisman; Rachael Walker; Michael D Ward; Klaus Warnatz; Sarah Warth; James V Watson; Carsten Watzl; Leonie Wegener; Annika Wiedemann; Jürgen Wienands; Gerald Willimsky; James Wing; Peter Wurst; Liping Yu; Alice Yue; Qianjun Zhang; Yi Zhao; Susanne Ziegler; Jakob Zimmermann
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.688

2.  Changes in serum and urine SAA concentrations and qualitative and quantitative proteinuria in Abyssinian cats with familial amyloidosis: a five-year longitudinal study (2009-2014).

Authors:  S Paltrinieri; G Sironi; L Giori; S Faverzani; M Longeri
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Acute Phase Proteins in Marine Mammals: State of Art, Perspectives and Challenges.

Authors:  Maria Elena Gelain; Federico Bonsembiante
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (second edition).

Authors:  Andrea Cossarizza; Hyun-Dong Chang; Andreas Radbruch; Andreas Acs; Dieter Adam; Sabine Adam-Klages; William W Agace; Nima Aghaeepour; Mübeccel Akdis; Matthieu Allez; Larissa Nogueira Almeida; Giorgia Alvisi; Graham Anderson; Immanuel Andrä; Francesco Annunziato; Achille Anselmo; Petra Bacher; Cosima T Baldari; Sudipto Bari; Vincenzo Barnaba; Joana Barros-Martins; Luca Battistini; Wolfgang Bauer; Sabine Baumgart; Nicole Baumgarth; Dirk Baumjohann; Bianka Baying; Mary Bebawy; Burkhard Becher; Wolfgang Beisker; Vladimir Benes; Rudi Beyaert; Alfonso Blanco; Dominic A Boardman; Christian Bogdan; Jessica G Borger; Giovanna Borsellino; Philip E Boulais; Jolene A Bradford; Dirk Brenner; Ryan R Brinkman; Anna E S Brooks; Dirk H Busch; Martin Büscher; Timothy P Bushnell; Federica Calzetti; Garth Cameron; Ilenia Cammarata; Xuetao Cao; Susanna L Cardell; Stefano Casola; Marco A Cassatella; Andrea Cavani; Antonio Celada; Lucienne Chatenoud; Pratip K Chattopadhyay; Sue Chow; Eleni Christakou; Luka Čičin-Šain; Mario Clerici; Federico S Colombo; Laura Cook; Anne Cooke; Andrea M Cooper; Alexandra J Corbett; Antonio Cosma; Lorenzo Cosmi; Pierre G Coulie; Ana Cumano; Ljiljana Cvetkovic; Van Duc Dang; Chantip Dang-Heine; Martin S Davey; Derek Davies; Sara De Biasi; Genny Del Zotto; Gelo Victoriano Dela Cruz; Michael Delacher; Silvia Della Bella; Paolo Dellabona; Günnur Deniz; Mark Dessing; James P Di Santo; Andreas Diefenbach; Francesco Dieli; Andreas Dolf; Thomas Dörner; Regine J Dress; Diana Dudziak; Michael Dustin; Charles-Antoine Dutertre; Friederike Ebner; Sidonia B G Eckle; Matthias Edinger; Pascale Eede; Götz R A Ehrhardt; Marcus Eich; Pablo Engel; Britta Engelhardt; Anna Erdei; Charlotte Esser; Bart Everts; Maximilien Evrard; Christine S Falk; Todd A Fehniger; Mar Felipo-Benavent; Helen Ferry; Markus Feuerer; Andrew Filby; Kata Filkor; Simon Fillatreau; Marie Follo; Irmgard Förster; John Foster; Gemma A Foulds; Britta Frehse; Paul S Frenette; Stefan Frischbutter; Wolfgang Fritzsche; David W Galbraith; Anastasia Gangaev; Natalio Garbi; Brice Gaudilliere; Ricardo T Gazzinelli; Jens Geginat; Wilhelm Gerner; Nicholas A Gherardin; Kamran Ghoreschi; Lara Gibellini; Florent Ginhoux; Keisuke Goda; Dale I Godfrey; Christoph Goettlinger; Jose M González-Navajas; Carl S Goodyear; Andrea Gori; Jane L Grogan; Daryl Grummitt; Andreas Grützkau; Claudia Haftmann; Jonas Hahn; Hamida Hammad; Günter Hämmerling; Leo Hansmann; Goran Hansson; Christopher M Harpur; Susanne Hartmann; Andrea Hauser; Anja E Hauser; David L Haviland; David Hedley; Daniela C Hernández; Guadalupe Herrera; Martin Herrmann; Christoph Hess; Thomas Höfer; Petra Hoffmann; Kristin Hogquist; Tristan Holland; Thomas Höllt; Rikard Holmdahl; Pleun Hombrink; Jessica P Houston; Bimba F Hoyer; Bo Huang; Fang-Ping Huang; Johanna E Huber; Jochen Huehn; Michael Hundemer; Christopher A Hunter; William Y K Hwang; Anna Iannone; Florian Ingelfinger; Sabine M Ivison; Hans-Martin Jäck; Peter K Jani; Beatriz Jávega; Stipan Jonjic; Toralf Kaiser; Tomas Kalina; Thomas Kamradt; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Baerbel Keller; Steven L C Ketelaars; Ahad Khalilnezhad; Srijit Khan; Jan Kisielow; Paul Klenerman; Jasmin Knopf; Hui-Fern Koay; Katja Kobow; Jay K Kolls; Wan Ting Kong; Manfred Kopf; Thomas Korn; Katharina Kriegsmann; Hendy Kristyanto; Thomas Kroneis; Andreas Krueger; Jenny Kühne; Christian Kukat; Désirée Kunkel; Heike Kunze-Schumacher; Tomohiro Kurosaki; Christian Kurts; Pia Kvistborg; Immanuel Kwok; Jonathan Landry; Olivier Lantz; Paola Lanuti; Francesca LaRosa; Agnès Lehuen; Salomé LeibundGut-Landmann; Michael D Leipold; Leslie Y T Leung; Megan K Levings; Andreia C Lino; Francesco Liotta; Virginia Litwin; Yanling Liu; Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren; Michael Lohoff; Giovanna Lombardi; Lilly Lopez; Miguel López-Botet; Amy E Lovett-Racke; Erik Lubberts; Herve Luche; Burkhard Ludewig; Enrico Lugli; Sebastian Lunemann; Holden T Maecker; Laura Maggi; Orla Maguire; Florian Mair; Kerstin H Mair; Alberto Mantovani; Rudolf A Manz; Aaron J Marshall; Alicia Martínez-Romero; Glòria Martrus; Ivana Marventano; Wlodzimierz Maslinski; Giuseppe Matarese; Anna Vittoria Mattioli; Christian Maueröder; Alessio Mazzoni; James McCluskey; Mairi McGrath; Helen M McGuire; Iain B McInnes; Henrik E Mei; Fritz Melchers; Susanne Melzer; Dirk Mielenz; Stephen D Miller; Kingston H G Mills; Hans Minderman; Jenny Mjösberg; Jonni Moore; Barry Moran; Lorenzo Moretta; Tim R Mosmann; Susann Müller; Gabriele Multhoff; Luis Enrique Muñoz; Christian Münz; Toshinori Nakayama; Milena Nasi; Katrin Neumann; Lai Guan Ng; Antonia Niedobitek; Sussan Nourshargh; Gabriel Núñez; José-Enrique O'Connor; Aaron Ochel; Anna Oja; Diana Ordonez; Alberto Orfao; Eva Orlowski-Oliver; Wenjun Ouyang; Annette Oxenius; Raghavendra Palankar; Isabel Panse; Kovit Pattanapanyasat; Malte Paulsen; Dinko Pavlinic; Livius Penter; Pärt Peterson; Christian Peth; Jordi Petriz; Federica Piancone; Winfried F Pickl; Silvia Piconese; Marcello Pinti; A Graham Pockley; Malgorzata Justyna Podolska; Zhiyong Poon; Katharina Pracht; Immo Prinz; Carlo E M Pucillo; Sally A Quataert; Linda Quatrini; Kylie M Quinn; Helena Radbruch; Tim R D J Radstake; Susann Rahmig; Hans-Peter Rahn; Bartek Rajwa; Gevitha Ravichandran; Yotam Raz; Jonathan A Rebhahn; Diether Recktenwald; Dorothea Reimer; Caetano Reis e Sousa; Ester B M Remmerswaal; Lisa Richter; Laura G Rico; Andy Riddell; Aja M Rieger; J Paul Robinson; Chiara Romagnani; Anna Rubartelli; Jürgen Ruland; Armin Saalmüller; Yvan Saeys; Takashi Saito; Shimon Sakaguchi; Francisco Sala-de-Oyanguren; Yvonne Samstag; Sharon Sanderson; Inga Sandrock; Angela Santoni; Ramon Bellmàs Sanz; Marina Saresella; Catherine Sautes-Fridman; Birgit Sawitzki; Linda Schadt; Alexander Scheffold; Hans U Scherer; Matthias Schiemann; Frank A Schildberg; Esther Schimisky; Andreas Schlitzer; Josephine Schlosser; Stephan Schmid; Steffen Schmitt; Kilian Schober; Daniel Schraivogel; Wolfgang Schuh; Thomas Schüler; Reiner Schulte; Axel Ronald Schulz; Sebastian R Schulz; Cristiano Scottá; Daniel Scott-Algara; David P Sester; T Vincent Shankey; Bruno Silva-Santos; Anna Katharina Simon; Katarzyna M Sitnik; Silvano Sozzani; Daniel E Speiser; Josef Spidlen; Anders Stahlberg; Alan M Stall; Natalie Stanley; Regina Stark; Christina Stehle; Tobit Steinmetz; Hannes Stockinger; Yousuke Takahama; Kiyoshi Takeda; Leonard Tan; Attila Tárnok; Gisa Tiegs; Gergely Toldi; Julia Tornack; Elisabetta Traggiai; Mohamed Trebak; Timothy I M Tree; Joe Trotter; John Trowsdale; Maria Tsoumakidou; Henning Ulrich; Sophia Urbanczyk; Willem van de Veen; Maries van den Broek; Edwin van der Pol; Sofie Van Gassen; Gert Van Isterdael; René A W van Lier; Marc Veldhoen; Salvador Vento-Asturias; Paulo Vieira; David Voehringer; Hans-Dieter Volk; Anouk von Borstel; Konrad von Volkmann; Ari Waisman; Rachael V Walker; Paul K Wallace; Sa A Wang; Xin M Wang; Michael D Ward; Kirsten A Ward-Hartstonge; Klaus Warnatz; Gary Warnes; Sarah Warth; Claudia Waskow; James V Watson; Carsten Watzl; Leonie Wegener; Thomas Weisenburger; Annika Wiedemann; Jürgen Wienands; Anneke Wilharm; Robert John Wilkinson; Gerald Willimsky; James B Wing; Rieke Winkelmann; Thomas H Winkler; Oliver F Wirz; Alicia Wong; Peter Wurst; Jennie H M Yang; Juhao Yang; Maria Yazdanbakhsh; Liping Yu; Alice Yue; Hanlin Zhang; Yi Zhao; Susanne Maria Ziegler; Christina Zielinski; Jakob Zimmermann; Arturo Zychlinsky
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.688

5.  An acute-phase protein as a regulator of sperm survival in the bovine oviduct: alpha 1-acid-glycoprotein impairs neutrophil phagocytosis of sperm in vitro.

Authors:  Jinghui Liu; Mohamed A Marey; Rasoul Kowsar; Nina Hambruch; Takashi Shimizu; Shingo Haneda; Motozumi Matsui; Motoki Sasaki; Hiroyuki Hayakawa; Christiane Pfarrer; Akio Miyamoto
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Relationship between rate of infection and markers of inflammation/immunity in Holy Birman cats with feline coronavirus.

Authors:  S Paltrinieri; G Rossi; A Giordano
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.534

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.