Literature DB >> 23726335

The pattern of facial skeletal growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation.

Zachary J Mellion1, Rolf G Behrents, Lysle E Johnston.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sequential stages in the development of the hand, wrist, and cervical vertebrae commonly are used to assess maturation and predict the timing of the adolescent growth spurt. This approach is predicated on the idea that forecasts based on skeletal age must, of necessity, be superior to those based on chronologic age. This study was undertaken to test this reasonable, albeit largely unproved, assumption in a large, longitudinal sample.
METHODS: Serial records of 100 children (50 girls, 50 boys) were chosen from the files of the Bolton-Brush Growth Study Center in Cleveland, Ohio. The 100 series were 6 to 11 years in length, a span that was designed to encompass the onset and the peak of the adolescent facial growth spurt in each subject. Five linear cephalometric measurements (S-Na, Na-Me, PNS-A, S-Go, Go-Pog) were summed to characterize general facial size; a sixth (Co-Gn) was used to assess mandibular length. In all, 864 cephalograms were traced and analyzed. For most years, chronologic age, height, and hand-wrist films were available, thereby permitting various alternative methods of maturational assessment and prediction to be tested. The hand-wrist and the cervical vertebrae films for each time point were staged. Yearly increments of growth for stature, face, and mandible were calculated and plotted against chronologic age. For each subject, the actual age at onset and peak for stature and facial and mandibular size served as the gold standards against which key ages inferred from other methods could be compared.
RESULTS: On average, the onset of the pubertal growth spurts in height, facial size, and mandibular length occurred in girls at 9.3, 9.8, and 9.5 years, respectively. The difference in timing between height and facial size growth spurts was statistically significant. In boys, the onset for height, facial size, and mandibular length occurred more or less simultaneously at 11.9, 12.0, and 11.9 years, respectively. In girls, the peak of the growth spurt in height, facial size, and mandibular length occurred at 10.9, 11.5, and 11.5 years. Height peaked significantly earlier than both facial size and mandibular length. In boys, the peak in height occurred slightly (but statistically significantly) earlier than did the peaks in the face and mandible: 14.0, 14.4, and 14.3 years. Based on rankings, the hand-wrist stages provided the best indication (lowest root mean squared error) that maturation had advanced to the peak velocity stage. Chronologic age, however, was nearly as good, whereas the vertebral stages were consistently the worst. Errors from the use of statural onset to predict the peak of the pubertal growth spurt in height, facial size, and mandibular length were uniformly lower than for predictions based on the cervical vertebrae. Chronologic age, especially in boys, was a close second.
CONCLUSIONS: The common assumption that onset and peak occur at ages 12 and 14 years in boys and 10 and 12 years in girls seems correct for boys, but it is 6 months to 1 year late for girls. As an index of maturation, hand-wrist skeletal ages appear to offer the best indication that peak growth velocity has been reached. Of the methods tested here for the prediction of the timing of peak velocity, statural onset had the lowest errors. Although mean chronologic ages were nearly as good, stature can be measured repeatedly and thus might lead to improved prediction of the timing of the adolescent growth spurt.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23726335     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  19 in total

1.  Predicting the mandibular growth spurt.

Authors:  Lorenzo Franchi; Michele Nieri; Irene Lomonaco; James A McNamara; Veronica Giuntini
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Three-dimensional condylar changes from Herbst appliance and multibracket treatment: A comparison with matched Class II elastics.

Authors:  Robert Y Wei; Arjun Atresh; Antonio Ruellas; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung Nguyen; Brent E Larson; Jonathan E Mangum; David J Manton; Paul M Schneider
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  The cervical vertebral maturation method: A user's guide.

Authors:  James A McNamara; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Combined soft and skeletal tissue modelling of normal and dysmorphic midface postnatal development.

Authors:  Amel Ibrahim; Michael Suttie; Neil W Bulstrode; Jonathan A Britto; David Dunaway; Peter Hammond; Patrizia Ferretti
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Fully automated determination of the cervical vertebrae maturation stages using deep learning with directional filters.

Authors:  Salih Furkan Atici; Rashid Ansari; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Omar Suhaym; Ahmet Enis Cetin; Mohammed H Elnagar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Estimating Craniofacial Growth Cessation: Comparison of Asymptote- and Rate-Based Methods.

Authors:  Anna M Hardin; Ryan P Knigge; Hee Soo Oh; Manish Valiathan; Dana L Duren; Kieran P McNulty; Kevin M Middleton; Richard J Sherwood
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2021-05-17

7.  No Own-Age Advantage in Children's Recognition of Emotion on Prototypical Faces of Different Ages.

Authors:  Sarah Griffiths; Ian S Penton-Voak; Chris Jarrold; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Advances in pubertal growth and factors influencing it: Can we increase pubertal growth?

Authors:  Ashraf Soliman; Vincenzo De Sanctis; Rania Elalaily; Said Bedair
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-11

9.  Relationship between maturation indices and morphology of the midpalatal suture obtained using cone-beam computed tomography images.

Authors:  Hong-Ik Jang; Sang-Cheol Kim; Jong-Moon Chae; Kyung-Hwa Kang; Jin-Woo Cho; Na-Young Chang; Keun-Young Lee; Jin-Hyoung Cho
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Functional genioplasty in growing patients.

Authors:  Sylvain Chamberland; William R Proffit; Pier-Eric Chamberland
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.