Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal1, Judith Manniën2, Mohammed M Ghaly3, Pieternel S Verhoeven4, Eileen K Hutton5, Hans S Reinders6. 1. Faculty of Theology, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: jt.vanderwal@vumc.nl. 2. Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.mannien@vumc.nl. 3. Islamic Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Leiden University, the Netherlands. Electronic address: M.Ghaly@religion.leidenuniv.nl. 4. Roosevelt Academy, Middelburg, the Netherlands. Electronic address: n.verhoeven@roac.nl. 5. Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; McMaster University, Department Midwifery Education Program, Hamilton, Canada. Electronic address: huttone@mcmaster.ca. 6. Faculty of Theology, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: js.reinders@th.vu.nl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: to explore what role religious beliefs of pregnant Muslim women play in their decision-making on antenatal screening, particularly regarding congenital abnormalities and termination, and whether their interpretations of the religious doctrines correspond to the main sources of Islam. DESIGN: qualitative pilot study using in-depth interviews with pregnant Muslim women. SETTING: one midwifery practice in a medium-sized city near Amsterdam participated in the study. PARTICIPANTS: 10 pregnant Muslim women of Turkish origin who live in a high density immigrant area and who attended primary midwives for antenatal care were included in the study. DATA COLLECTION AND DATA ANALYSIS: to explore the role of religion in decision-making on antenatal screening tests, a topic list was constructed, including four subjects: being a (practising) Muslim, the view on unborn life, the view on disabled life and the view on termination. To analyse the interviews, open and axial coding based on the Grounded Theory was used and descriptive and analytical themes were identified and interpreted. FINDINGS: all 10 interviewees stated that their faith played a role in their decision-making on antenatal screening, specific to the combined test. They did not consider congenital anomalies as a problem and did not consider termination to be an option in case of a disabled fetus. However, the Islamic jurisprudence considers that termination is allowed if the fetus has serious abnormalities, but only before 19 weeks plus one day of gestation. KEY CONCLUSIONS: religious convictions play a role regarding antenatal screening in pregnant Muslim women of Turkish origin. The interviewees did not consider a termination in case of an affected child. Women were unaware that within Islamic tradition there is the possibility of termination if a fetus has serious anomalies. Incomplete knowledge of religious doctrines may be influencing both decisions of antenatal screening and diagnostic tests uptake and of terminating a pregnancy for fetuses with serious anomalies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTISE: counsellors should be aware of the role of religious beliefs in the decision-making process on antenatal screening tests.
OBJECTIVE: to explore what role religious beliefs of pregnant Muslim women play in their decision-making on antenatal screening, particularly regarding congenital abnormalities and termination, and whether their interpretations of the religious doctrines correspond to the main sources of Islam. DESIGN: qualitative pilot study using in-depth interviews with pregnant Muslim women. SETTING: one midwifery practice in a medium-sized city near Amsterdam participated in the study. PARTICIPANTS: 10 pregnant Muslim women of Turkish origin who live in a high density immigrant area and who attended primary midwives for antenatal care were included in the study. DATA COLLECTION AND DATA ANALYSIS: to explore the role of religion in decision-making on antenatal screening tests, a topic list was constructed, including four subjects: being a (practising) Muslim, the view on unborn life, the view on disabled life and the view on termination. To analyse the interviews, open and axial coding based on the Grounded Theory was used and descriptive and analytical themes were identified and interpreted. FINDINGS: all 10 interviewees stated that their faith played a role in their decision-making on antenatal screening, specific to the combined test. They did not consider congenital anomalies as a problem and did not consider termination to be an option in case of a disabled fetus. However, the Islamic jurisprudence considers that termination is allowed if the fetus has serious abnormalities, but only before 19 weeks plus one day of gestation. KEY CONCLUSIONS: religious convictions play a role regarding antenatal screening in pregnant Muslim women of Turkish origin. The interviewees did not consider a termination in case of an affected child. Women were unaware that within Islamic tradition there is the possibility of termination if a fetus has serious anomalies. Incomplete knowledge of religious doctrines may be influencing both decisions of antenatal screening and diagnostic tests uptake and of terminating a pregnancy for fetuses with serious anomalies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTISE: counsellors should be aware of the role of religious beliefs in the decision-making process on antenatal screening tests.
Authors: Sylvia M van der Pal; Nicole M C van Kesteren; Jacobus P van Wouwe; Paula van Dommelen; Symone B Detmar Journal: J Environ Public Health Date: 2013-11-17
Authors: Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Judith Manniën; Lisanne A Gitsels; Hans S Reinders; Pieternel S Verhoeven; Mohammed M Ghaly; Trudy Klomp; Eileen K Hutton Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2014-07-19 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Pieternel S Verhoeven; Judith Manniën; Linda Martin; Hans S Reinders; Evelien Spelten; Eileen K Hutton Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2014-08-09 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Ingrid A Peters; Kirsten M Heetkamp; Nicolette T C Ursem; Eric A P Steegers; Semiha Denktaş; Maarten F C M Knapen Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2018-03