Literature DB >> 23726110

Biological and biomechanical evaluation of the ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS AC) in a sheep model of anterior cruciate ligament replacement: a 3-month and 12-month study.

Véronique Viateau1, Mathieu Manassero, Fani Anagnostou, Sandra Guérard, David Mitton, Véronique Migonney.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to assess tissue ingrowth within the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) artificial ligament (LARS AC; LARS, Arc sur Tille, France) and to study the biomechanical characteristics of the reconstructed knees in a sheep model of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) replacement.
METHODS: Twenty-five female sheep underwent excision of the proximal third of the left ACL and intra-articular joint stabilization with a 44-strand polyethylene terephthalate ligament (mean ultimate tensile failure load, 2,500 N). Animals were killed either 3 or 12 months after surgery. Explanted knees were processed for histology (n = 10) or mechanical tests including tests of laxity and loading to failure in tension (n = 15).
RESULTS: Well-vascularized tissue ingrowth within the artificial ligament was only observed in the portions of the ligament in contact with the host's tissues (native ligament and bone tunnels). Ligament wear was observed in 40% of explanted knees. The ultimate tensile failure loads of the operated knees at both time points were inferior to those of the contralateral, intact knees (144 ± 69 N at 3 months and 260 ± 126 N at 12 months versus 1,241 ± 270 N and 1,218 ± 189 N, respectively) (P < .01). In specimens with intact artificial ligaments, failure occurred by slippage from the bone tunnels in all specimens explanted 3 months postoperatively and in half of the specimens explanted 12 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that the LARS AC has a satisfactory biointegration but that it is not suitable for ACL replacement if uniform tissue ingrowth is contemplated. Despite good clinical performance up to 1 year after implantation, none of the reconstructions approached the mechanical performance of the normal ACL in the ovine model. Partial tearing of the artificial ligament, which led to a significant decrease in ultimate tensile strength, was observed in 40% of cases in the ovine model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The LARS is not a suitable scaffold for ACL replacement. Further animal studies are needed to evaluate its potential for augmentation of ligament repair.
Copyright © 2013 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23726110     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  11 in total

1.  In vivo evaluation of the bone integration of coated poly(vinyl-alcohol) hydrogel fiber implants.

Authors:  David Moreau; Arthur Villain; Manon Bachy; Henry Proudhon; David N Ku; Didier Hannouche; Hervé Petite; Laurent Corté
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of four femoral fixation configurations in a simulated anterior cruciate ligament replacement using a new generation of Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS™ AC).

Authors:  Olivier Barbier; Sandra Guérard; Philippe Boisrenoult; Patricia Thoreux
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-01-30

3.  Cadaveric scapholunate reconstruction using the ligament augmentation and reconstruction system.

Authors:  Kevin Eng; Michael Wagels; Stephen K Tham
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2014-08

Review 4.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best practice: A review of graft choice.

Authors:  Daniel A Shaerf; Philip S Pastides; Khaled M Sarraf; Charles A Willis-Owen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-18

5.  Clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using LARS artificial graft with an at least 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Zhenyu Jia; Chenchen Xue; Wei Wang; Tianze Liu; Xuan Huang; Weidong Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Complex knee injuries treated in acute phase: Long-term results using Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System artificial ligament.

Authors:  John Gliatis; Konstantinos Anagnostou; Pantelis Tsoumpos; Evdokia Billis; Maria Papandreou; Spyridon Plessas
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-18

7.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with LARS Artificial Ligament-Clinical Results after a Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Paolo Domenico Parchi; Gianluca Ciapini; Carlo Paglialunga; Michele Giuntoli; Carmine Picece; Fabio Chiellini; Michele Lisanti; Michelangelo Scaglione
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2018-05-23

8.  ACL Reconstruction Using Autologous Hamstrings Augmented With the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System Provides Good Clinical Scores, High Levels of Satisfaction and Return to Sport, and a Low Retear Rate at 2 Years.

Authors:  Jay R Ebert; Peter T Annear
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-10-30

9.  Differences in artificial ligament graft osseointegration of the anterior cruciate ligament in a sheep model: a comparison between interference screw and cortical suspensory fixation.

Authors:  Hong Li; Fangyi Jiang; Yunsheng Ge; Fang Wan; Hongyun Li; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-09

10.  Impact of chemical and physical treatments on the mechanical properties of poly(ε-caprolactone) fibers bundles for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Amélie Leroux; Christophe Egles; Véronique Migonney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.