Literature DB >> 23725993

Imaging breast cancer bone metastases: current status and future directions.

Jennifer Glendenning1, Gary Cook.   

Abstract

The skeleton is commonly affected in the context of metastatic breast cancer and is a cause of significant morbidity in these individuals. Therapeutic options include systemic therapy, radiotherapy, and surgery given with the intent of preserving function and quality of life. As the spectrum of available therapies increases, key challenges comprise reliable diagnosis of bony metastatic disease and accurate evaluation of response that permits rapid therapeutic transition in those responding inadequately prior to development of significant skeletal morbidity. The (99m)Tc-diphosphonate bone scan remains one of the most commonly requested investigations for skeletal evaluation in patients with breast cancer. However a time lag of 3-6 months for accurate response evaluation from the start of treatment limits its utility for response evaluation in routine clinical practice or as a progression end point in the research setting. Functional imaging strategies using more tumor-specific radiopharmaceuticals show promise as an effective means of imaging response at a clinically relevant time point and are the subject of this review.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23725993     DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2013.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  12 in total

1.  [Multimodal imaging of breast cancer recurrence : Prospective intraindividual comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT, contrast-enhanced CT, and bone scintigraphy].

Authors:  M Avanesov; T Derlin
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Therapy assessment of bone metastatic disease in the era of 223radium.

Authors:  Elba Etchebehere; Ana Emilia Brito; Alireza Rezaee; Werner Langsteger; Mohsen Beheshti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT for monitoring therapy response in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Christopher C Riedl; Katja Pinker; Gary A Ulaner; Leonard T Ong; Pascal Baltzer; Maxine S Jochelson; Heather L McArthur; Mithat Gönen; Maura Dickler; Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Monitoring in metastatic breast cancer: is imaging outdated in the era of circulating tumor cells?

Authors:  Marianna Alunni-Fabbroni; Volkmar Müller; Tanja Fehm; Wolfgang Janni; Brigitte Rack
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  May CTC technologies promote better cancer management?

Authors:  Martin Pesta; Vlastimil Kulda; Andrea Narsanska; Jakub Fichtl; Ondrej Topolcan
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 6.543

6.  Integrated multimodal imaging of dynamic bone-tumor alterations associated with metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Brisset; Benjamin A Hoff; Thomas L Chenevert; Jon A Jacobson; Jennifer L Boes; Stefanie Galbán; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Timothy D Johnson; Kenneth J Pienta; Craig J Galbán; Charles R Meyer; Timothy Schakel; Klaas Nicolay; Ajjai S Alva; Maha Hussain; Brian D Ross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Breast Cancer to Bone (B2B) Metastases Research Program: a multi-disciplinary investigation of bone metastases from breast cancer.

Authors:  Nigel T Brockton; Stephanie J Gill; Stephanie L Laborge; Alexander H G Paterson; Linda S Cook; Hans J Vogel; Carrie S Shemanko; David A Hanley; Anthony M Magliocco; Christine M Friedenreich
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Current approaches and challenges in early detection of breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Erika J Schneble; Lindsey J Graham; Matthew P Shupe; Frederick L Flynt; Kevin P Banks; Aaron D Kirkpatrick; Aviram Nissan; Leonard Henry; Alexander Stojadinovic; Nathan M Shumway; Itzhak Avital; George E Peoples; Robert F Setlik
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  18F-Fluoride PET/CT tumor burden quantification predicts survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ana E Brito; Allan Santos; André Deeke Sasse; Cesar Cabello; Paulo Oliveira; Camila Mosci; Tiago Souza; Barbara Amorim; Mariana Lima; Celso D Ramos; Elba Etchebehere
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-30

Review 10.  The role of general nuclear medicine in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lacey R Greene; Deborah Wilkinson
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2015-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.