Literature DB >> 23724882

Heart rate recovery and heart rate variability are unchanged in patients with coronary artery disease following 12 weeks of high-intensity interval and moderate-intensity endurance exercise training.

Katharine D Currie1, Lee M Rosen, Philip J Millar, Robert S McKelvie, Maureen J MacDonald.   

Abstract

Decreased heart rate variability and attenuated heart rate recovery following exercise are associated with an increased risk of mortality in cardiac patients. This study investigated the effects of 12 weeks of moderate-intensity endurance exercise (END) and a novel low-volume high-intensity interval exercise protocol (HIT) on measures of heart rate recovery and heart rate variability in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Fourteen males with CAD participated in 12 weeks of END or HIT training, each consisting of 2 supervised exercise sessions per week. END consisted of 30-50 min of continuous cycling at 60% peak power output (PPO). HIT involved ten 1-min intervals at 88% PPO separated by 1-min intervals at 10% PPO. Heart rate recovery at 1 min and 2 min was measured before and after training (pre- and post-training, respectively) using a submaximal exercise bout. Resting time and spectral and nonlinear domain measures of heart rate variability were calculated. Following 12 weeks of END and HIT, there was no change in heart rate recovery at 1 min (END, 40 ± 12 beats·min(-1) vs. 37 ± 19 beats·min(-1); HIT, 31 ± 8 beats·min(-1) vs. 35 ± 8 beats·min(-1); p ≥ 0.05 for pre- vs. post-training) or 2 min (END, 44 ± 18 beats·min(-1) vs. 43 ± 19 beats·min(-1); HIT, 42 ± 10 beats·min(-1) vs. 50 ± 6 beats·min(-1); p ≥ 0.05 for pre- vs. post-training). All heart rate variability indices were unchanged following END and HIT training. In conclusion, neither END nor HIT exercise programs elicited training-induced improvements in cardiac autonomic function in patients with CAD. The absence of improvements with training may be attributed to the optimal medical management and normative pretraining state of our sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23724882     DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2012-0354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  12 in total

Review 1.  Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation and parasympathetic function in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Agustín Manresa-Rocamora; Fernando Ribeiro; José Manuel Sarabia; Javier Íbias; Nórton Luís Oliveira; Francisco José Vera-García; Manuel Moya-Ramón
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 2.  Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with a Focus on Secondary Outcomes.

Authors:  Nele Pattyn; Randy Beulque; Véronique Cornelissen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Low-volume, high-intensity, aerobic interval exercise for sedentary adults: VO₂max, cardiac mass, and heart rate recovery.

Authors:  Tomoaki Matsuo; Kousaku Saotome; Satoshi Seino; Miki Eto; Nobutake Shimojo; Akira Matsushita; Motoyuki Iemitsu; Hiroshi Ohshima; Kiyoji Tanaka; Chiaki Mukai
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Induces Specific Changes in Respiration and Electron Leakage in the Mitochondria of Different Rat Skeletal Muscles.

Authors:  Dionizio Ramos-Filho; Gustavo Chicaybam; Eduardo de-Souza-Ferreira; Camila Guerra Martinez; Eleonora Kurtenbach; Gustavo Casimiro-Lopes; Antonio Galina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The effects of baseline heart rate recovery normality and exercise training protocol on heart rate recovery in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Yalın Tolga Yaylalı; Gülin Fındıkoğlu; Mustafa Yurtdaş; Sibel Konukçu; Hande Şenol
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 1.596

6.  Age-related decline in cardiac autonomic function is not attenuated with increased physical activity.

Authors:  Hugo Njemanze; Charlotte Warren; Christopher Eggett; Guy A MacGowan; Matthew G D Bates; Mario Siervo; Srdjan Ivkovic; Michael I Trenell; Djordje G Jakovljevic
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-22

7.  Effects of 6 Months of Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation on Autonomic Function and Neuro-Cardiovascular Stress Reactivity in Coronary Artery Disease Patients.

Authors:  Mark B Badrov; Katelyn N Wood; Sophie Lalande; Carolyn P Sawicki; Lindsay J Borrell; Carly C Barron; Jennifer L Vording; Arlene Fleischhauer; Neville Suskin; Cheri L McGowan; J Kevin Shoemaker
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Brief Vigorous Stair Climbing Effectively Improves Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Emily C Dunford; Sydney E Valentino; Jonathan Dubberley; Sara Y Oikawa; Chris McGlory; Eva Lonn; Mary E Jung; Martin J Gibala; Stuart M Phillips; Maureen J MacDonald
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-02-16

9.  Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training in a Gym Setting Improves Cardio-Metabolic and Psychological Health.

Authors:  Sam O Shepherd; Oliver J Wilson; Alexandra S Taylor; Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani; Ahmed M Adlan; Anton J M Wagenmakers; Christopher S Shaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interval training based on ventilatory anaerobic threshold increases cardiac vagal modulation and decreases high-sensitivity c-reative protein: randomized clinical trial in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nayara Y Tamburus; Roberta F L Paula; Vandeni C Kunz; Marcelo C César; Marlene A Moreno; Ester da Silva
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.