Literature DB >> 23723784

catena-Poly[[tetra-aqua-cadmium]-μ-5,5'-(1,4-phenyl-ene)di(tetra-zol-2-ido)-κ(2) N (2):N (2')].

Qinqin Dang1, Han Caiyun.   

Abstract

In the title compound, [Cd(C8H4N8)(H2O)4] n , 5,5'-(1,4-phenyl-ene)di(tetra-zol-2-ide) (L) ligands bridge Cd(II) atoms into polymeric chains along [201]. The Cd(II) atom is situated on an inversion centre and is coordinated by two N atoms from two L ligands and by four water O atoms in a distorted octa-hedral geometry. In the L ligand, the benzene ring resides on an inversion centre and the tetra-zole rings are twisted from its plane by 22.3 (1)°. An extensive hydrogen-bonding network formed by classical O-H⋯N and O-H⋯O inter-actions consolidates the crystal packing, linking the poymeric chains into a three-dimensional structure.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23723784      PMCID: PMC3647818          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813010441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to coordination frameworks, see: Yaghi et al. (2003 ▶); Kitagawa et al. (2004 ▶); Ockwig et al. (2005 ▶). For details of the synthesis of 1,4-bis­(tetra­zole-5-yl)benzene, see: Tao et al. (2004 ▶). For the crystal structures of coordination polymers containing the 1,4-bis­(tetra­zole-5-yl)benzene ligand, see: Dinca et al. (2006 ▶); Ouellette et al. (2009 ▶); Liu et al. (2012 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Cd(C8H4N8)(H2O)4] M = 396.66 Monoclinic, a = 5.3188 (4) Å b = 11.1525 (14) Å c = 12.0279 (8) Å β = 101.256 (7)° V = 699.75 (11) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 1.59 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.25 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Agilent Xcalibur (Eos, Gemini) diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2012 ▶) T min = 0.692, T max = 0.796 2351 measured reflections 1237 independent reflections 895 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.033

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040 wR(F 2) = 0.085 S = 1.05 1237 reflections 99 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.62 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.53 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Click here for additional data file. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813010441/cv5403sup1.cif Click here for additional data file. Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813010441/cv5403Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Cd(C8H4N8)(H2O)4]F(000) = 392
Mr = 396.662013-04-07 # Formatted by publCIF
Monoclinic, P21/nDx = 1.883 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 2ynMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.3188 (4) ÅCell parameters from 739 reflections
b = 11.1525 (14) Åθ = 3.5–29.1°
c = 12.0279 (8) ŵ = 1.59 mm1
β = 101.256 (7)°T = 293 K
V = 699.75 (11) Å3Prism, yellow
Z = 20.25 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm
Agilent Xcalibur (Eos, Gemini) diffractometer1237 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube895 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.033
Detector resolution: 16.0710 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.5°
ω scansh = −5→6
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2012)k = −5→13
Tmin = 0.692, Tmax = 0.796l = −13→14
2351 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.085H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0301P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1237 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
99 parametersΔρmax = 0.62 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.53 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cd10.50000.50000.50000.0273 (2)
O10.7271 (6)0.6312 (4)0.4040 (3)0.0365 (10)
H1A0.62610.68590.36960.055*
H1B0.79180.59210.35440.055*
N10.0067 (7)0.5049 (4)0.2701 (3)0.0266 (10)
N40.0598 (8)0.3375 (4)0.1802 (4)0.0369 (12)
C2−0.2949 (9)0.4694 (5)0.0882 (4)0.0279 (13)
C4−0.3166 (9)0.4199 (5)−0.0197 (4)0.0333 (13)
H4−0.19330.3658−0.03350.040*
N20.2066 (7)0.4426 (4)0.3287 (4)0.0327 (11)
C1−0.0782 (9)0.4371 (5)0.1798 (4)0.0286 (12)
N30.2401 (8)0.3426 (4)0.2768 (4)0.0403 (12)
O20.2732 (8)0.6693 (4)0.5307 (4)0.0659 (14)
H2A0.34840.70380.59140.099*
H2B0.12250.64880.53760.099*
C3−0.4828 (10)0.5505 (5)0.1061 (4)0.0342 (13)
H3−0.47240.58490.17730.041*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cd10.0262 (3)0.0279 (3)0.0244 (3)0.0008 (3)−0.0036 (2)−0.0009 (3)
O10.034 (2)0.041 (3)0.034 (2)0.0078 (17)0.0051 (18)0.0042 (19)
N10.021 (2)0.036 (3)0.019 (2)0.005 (2)−0.0059 (17)0.001 (2)
N40.039 (3)0.033 (3)0.031 (3)0.008 (2)−0.013 (2)−0.005 (2)
C20.023 (3)0.034 (4)0.024 (3)−0.003 (2)−0.002 (2)0.001 (2)
C40.030 (3)0.036 (4)0.030 (3)0.008 (3)−0.004 (2)−0.002 (3)
N20.031 (2)0.039 (3)0.025 (2)0.001 (2)−0.004 (2)0.001 (2)
C10.027 (3)0.035 (3)0.020 (3)0.000 (3)−0.002 (2)0.002 (3)
N30.042 (3)0.036 (3)0.034 (3)0.005 (2)−0.014 (2)−0.003 (2)
O20.047 (2)0.062 (3)0.084 (4)0.001 (2)0.001 (2)−0.019 (3)
C30.039 (3)0.041 (4)0.018 (3)0.006 (3)−0.006 (2)−0.006 (3)
Cd1—O2i2.309 (4)N4—N31.355 (5)
Cd1—O22.309 (4)C2—C41.394 (7)
Cd1—O12.340 (3)C2—C31.396 (7)
Cd1—O1i2.340 (3)C2—C11.475 (7)
Cd1—N22.416 (4)C4—C3ii1.377 (7)
Cd1—N2i2.416 (4)C4—H40.9300
O1—H1A0.8631N2—N31.307 (6)
O1—H1B0.8625O2—H2A0.8527
N1—C11.328 (6)O2—H2B0.8526
N1—N21.348 (6)C3—C4ii1.377 (7)
N4—C11.331 (6)C3—H30.9300
O2i—Cd1—O2179.999 (1)C4—C2—C3117.9 (5)
O2i—Cd1—O195.51 (15)C4—C2—C1120.6 (4)
O2—Cd1—O184.49 (15)C3—C2—C1121.4 (5)
O2i—Cd1—O1i84.49 (15)C3ii—C4—C2121.3 (5)
O2—Cd1—O1i95.51 (15)C3ii—C4—H4119.4
O1—Cd1—O1i180.0C2—C4—H4119.4
O2i—Cd1—N285.26 (16)N3—N2—N1110.9 (4)
O2—Cd1—N294.74 (16)N3—N2—Cd1120.5 (3)
O1—Cd1—N293.12 (13)N1—N2—Cd1128.4 (3)
O1i—Cd1—N286.88 (13)N1—C1—N4111.9 (4)
O2i—Cd1—N2i94.74 (16)N1—C1—C2124.3 (5)
O2—Cd1—N2i85.26 (16)N4—C1—C2123.8 (5)
O1—Cd1—N2i86.88 (13)N2—N3—N4107.8 (4)
O1i—Cd1—N2i93.12 (13)Cd1—O2—H2A109.5
N2—Cd1—N2i180.0 (3)Cd1—O2—H2B109.1
Cd1—O1—H1A110.2H2A—O2—H2B109.3
Cd1—O1—H1B109.8C4ii—C3—C2120.8 (5)
H1A—O1—H1B108.7C4ii—C3—H3119.6
C1—N1—N2104.0 (4)C2—C3—H3119.6
C1—N4—N3105.4 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1B···N1iii0.861.932.779 (5)167
O1—H1A···N4iv0.861.992.836 (6)166
O2—H2A···N3i0.852.493.121 (6)131
O2—H2B···O1v0.852.393.035 (6)133
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1B⋯N1i 0.861.932.779 (5)167
O1—H1A⋯N4ii 0.861.992.836 (6)166
O2—H2A⋯N3iii 0.852.493.121 (6)131
O2—H2B⋯O1iv 0.852.393.035 (6)133

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  7 in total

1.  Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials.

Authors:  Omar M Yaghi; Michael O'Keeffe; Nathan W Ockwig; Hee K Chae; Mohamed Eddaoudi; Jaheon Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Functional porous coordination polymers.

Authors:  Susumu Kitagawa; Ryo Kitaura; Shin-ichiro Noro
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Reticular chemistry: occurrence and taxonomy of nets and grammar for the design of frameworks.

Authors:  Nathan W Ockwig; Olaf Delgado-Friedrichs; Michael O'Keeffe; Omar M Yaghi
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 22.384

4.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  A thermally and hydrolytically stable microporous framework exhibiting single-chain magnetism: structure and properties of [Co2(H0.67bdt)3] x 20 H2O.

Authors:  Wayne Ouellette; Andrey V Prosvirin; Kelly Whitenack; Kim R Dunbar; Jon Zubieta
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Microporous metal-organic frameworks incorporating 1,4-benzeneditetrazolate: syntheses, structures, and hydrogen storage properties.

Authors:  Mircea Dinca; Anta F Yu; Jeffrey R Long
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Synthesis and characterization of a tetrazolate-bridged coordination framework encapsulating D2h-symmetric cyclic (H2O)4 cluster arrays.

Authors:  Jun Tao; Zhi-Jie Ma; Rong-Bin Huang; Lan-Sun Zheng
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2004-10-04       Impact factor: 5.165

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.