Xavier Mariette1, Stephanie Rouanet2, Jean Sibilia3, Bernard Combe4, Xavier Le Loët5, Jacques Tebib6, Rosemary Jourdan2, Maxime Dougados7. 1. Department of Rheumatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Sud, Université Paris Sud, INSERM U1012, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. 2. Roche, Boulogne Billancourt, France. 3. Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. 4. Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Université Montpellier I, Montpellier, France. 5. Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Universitaire de Rouen, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine (IRIB), Rouen University, Rouen, France. 6. Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Lyon-sud, Pierre-Bénite, France. 7. Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Cochin, Rene Descartes University, Paris, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The licensed dose of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is two doses of 1000 mg given 2 weeks apart. A lower dose has never been specifically studied in patients with an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of rituximab repeat treatment with two doses (1000 mg×1 and 1000 mg×2) following initial treatment with 1000 mg×2. METHODS: We set up an open-label, prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority study comprising a non-controlled period (24 weeks) followed by a randomised controlled period (weeks 24-104) in patients with RA and an inadequate response to anti-TNF agents. All patients received one course of rituximab (1000 mg×2) with methotrexate. At week 24, patients achieving a EULAR response (moderate or good) were randomised to rituximab retreatment at 1000 mg×1 (Arm A) or 1000 mg×2 (Arm B). The primary objective measure was disease activity in 28 joints C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) area under the curve (AUC) over 104 weeks with a non-inferiority margin defined by 20% (444) of the mean DAS28-CRP AUC (mean±SD 2218±967) of the reference data. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat and per-protocol (PP) populations comprised 143 (A/B: 70/73) and 100 (A/B: 51/49) patients, respectively. The adjusted mean difference in DAS28-CRP AUC (PP) was 51.4 (95% CI -131.2 to 234), demonstrating non-inferiority between arms A and B. The overall rituximab safety profile was similar with both retreatment regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Following a clinical response to a first course of rituximab in RA at the licensed dose of 1000 mg×2, retreatment with rituximab at 1000 mg×1 results in efficacy outcomes that are non-inferior to those achieved with retreatment at 1000 mg×2. CLINICALTRIALSGOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01126541. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: The licensed dose of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is two doses of 1000 mg given 2 weeks apart. A lower dose has never been specifically studied in patients with an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of rituximab repeat treatment with two doses (1000 mg×1 and 1000 mg×2) following initial treatment with 1000 mg×2. METHODS: We set up an open-label, prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority study comprising a non-controlled period (24 weeks) followed by a randomised controlled period (weeks 24-104) in patients with RA and an inadequate response to anti-TNF agents. All patients received one course of rituximab (1000 mg×2) with methotrexate. At week 24, patients achieving a EULAR response (moderate or good) were randomised to rituximab retreatment at 1000 mg×1 (Arm A) or 1000 mg×2 (Arm B). The primary objective measure was disease activity in 28 joints C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) area under the curve (AUC) over 104 weeks with a non-inferiority margin defined by 20% (444) of the mean DAS28-CRP AUC (mean±SD 2218±967) of the reference data. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat and per-protocol (PP) populations comprised 143 (A/B: 70/73) and 100 (A/B: 51/49) patients, respectively. The adjusted mean difference in DAS28-CRP AUC (PP) was 51.4 (95% CI -131.2 to 234), demonstrating non-inferiority between arms A and B. The overall rituximab safety profile was similar with both retreatment regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Following a clinical response to a first course of rituximab in RA at the licensed dose of 1000 mg×2, retreatment with rituximab at 1000 mg×1 results in efficacy outcomes that are non-inferior to those achieved with retreatment at 1000 mg×2. CLINICALTRIALSGOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01126541. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
B cells; Rheumatoid Arthritis; Treatment
Authors: Divi Cornec; Brian F Kabat; John R Mills; Melissa Cheu; Amber M Hummel; Darrell R Schroeder; Matthew D Cascino; Paul Brunetta; David L Murray; Melissa R Snyder; Fernando Fervenza; Gary S Hoffman; Cees G M Kallenberg; Carol A Langford; Peter A Merkel; Paul A Monach; Philip Seo; Robert F Spiera; E William St Clair; John H Stone; David R Barnidge; Ulrich Specks Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Isidoro González-Álvaro; Carmen Martínez-Fernández; Benito Dorantes-Calderón; Rosario García-Vicuña; Blanca Hernández-Cruz; Alicia Herrero-Ambrosio; Olatz Ibarra-Barrueta; Emilio Martín-Mola; Emilio Monte-Boquet; Alberto Morell-Baladrón; Raimon Sanmartí; Jesús Sanz-Sanz; Francisco Javier de Toro-Santos; Paloma Vela; José Andrés Román Ivorra; José Luis Poveda-Andrés; Santiago Muñoz-Fernández Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Luis Arturo Gutierrez-Gonzalez; Marco Antonio Rivera Gudiño; Ibell Oropeza Ceija; Marialina Marin Leonet; Zair Tovar Noguera Journal: Open Rheumatol J Date: 2013-10-18
Authors: Jérémie Sellam; Elodie Rivière; Alice Courties; Paul-Olivier Rouzaire; Barbara Tolusso; Edward M Vital; Paul Emery; Gianfranco Ferraccioli; Martin Soubrier; Bineta Ly; Houria Hendel Chavez; Yassine Taoufik; Maxime Dougados; Xavier Mariette Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2016-12-13 Impact factor: 5.156