Literature DB >> 23723273

Simultaneous versus staged bilateral unicompartmental knee replacement.

J Y Chen1, N N Lo, L Jiang, H C Chong, D K J Tay, P L Chin, S-L Chia, S J Yeo.   

Abstract

We prospectively followed 171 patients who underwent bilateral unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) over a period of two years. Of these, 124 (72.5%) underwent a simultaneous bilateral procedure and 47 (27.5%) underwent a staged procedure. The mean cumulative operating time and length of hospital stay were both shorter in the simultaneous group, by 22.5 minutes (p < 0.001) and three days (p < 0.001), respectively. The mean reduction in haemoglobin level post-operatively was greater by 0.15 g/dl in the simultaneous group (p = 0.023), but this did not translate into a significant increase in the number of patients requiring blood transfusion (p = 1.000). The mean hospital cost was lower by $8892 in the simultaneous group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the groups, and at two-year follow-up there was no difference in the outcomes between the two groups. We conclude that simultaneous bilateral UKR can be recommended as an appropriate treatment for patients with bilateral medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Functional Outcomes; Knee; Simultaneous; Staged; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23723273     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B6.30440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  8 in total

1.  Onsets of complications and revisions are not increased after simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in comparison with unilateral procedures.

Authors:  Sergio Romagnoli; Sara Zacchetti; Paolo Perazzo; Francesco Verde; Giuseppe Banfi; Marco Viganò
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Comparison of early effectiveness and safety of simultaneous and staged bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for bilateral anteromedial compartment osteoarthritis].

Authors:  Zhiyuan Su; Juncai Liu; Xiangtian Deng; Yunong Ao; Daiqing Wei; Yun Luo; Zhong Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-07-15

3.  Bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: one stage or two stages?

Authors:  A Biazzo; F Masia; F Verde
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-12-03

4.  A meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes in simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Haowen Kwan; Kendrick To; Christine Bojanic; Karl Romain; Wasim Khan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-14

5.  Staged vs simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for clinical outcomes: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wang Chen; Jianning Sun; Ye Zhang; Zhenghao Hu; Xiang-Yang Chen; Shuo Feng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  One-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a suitable option vs. the two-stage approach: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pietro Feltri; Camilla Mondini Trissino da Lodi; Alberto Grassi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Christian Candrian; Giuseppe Filardo
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19

Review 7.  Safety and outcome of simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Philip P Manolopoulos; Fabio Mancino; Seong J Jang; Alex Gu; Dimitrios Giotis; Matteo Denti; Vasileios S Nikolaou; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-19

8.  Is Routine Thromboprophylaxis Needed in Korean Patients Undergoing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  In Jun Koh; Ju Hwan Kim; Man Soo Kim; Sung Won Jang; Chulkyu Kim; Yong In
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.153

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.