Literature DB >> 23722116

Corticospinal responses of resistance-trained and un-trained males during dynamic muscle contractions.

J Tallent1, S Goodall, T Hortobágyi, A St Clair Gibson, G Howatson.   

Abstract

Little is known regarding the modulation and the plasticity of the neural pathway interconnecting elements of the central nervous system and skeletal muscle in resistant-trained individuals. The aim of the study was to compare corticospinal and spinal responses measured during dynamic muscle contractions of the tibialis anterior in resistance trained (RT) and un-trained (UT) males. Nine UT and 10 RT male volunteers reported to the laboratory 24h following a familiarisation session. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and the cortical silent period were evoked using transcranial magnetic stimulation at a range of contraction intensities and was delivered as the ankle passed 90° during shortening and lengthening contractions. The Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) and V-waves were evoked with peripheral nerve stimulation. Despite the RT group being significantly stronger during shortening (28%; P=0.023: CI=1.27-15.1Nm), lengthening (25%; P=0.041: CI=0.27-17.0Nm) and isometric muscle actions (20%; P=0.041; CI=0.77-14.9Nm), no differences between the groups existed for corticospinal or spinal variables. Lack of detectable differences between RT and UT individuals may be linked to minimal exposure to task specific, isolated high intensity resistance training of the TA muscle.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  H-reflex; Lengthening; Recovery; Resistance training; Shortening; TMS

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23722116     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  10 in total

Review 1.  Corticospinal and spinal adaptations to motor skill and resistance training: Potential mechanisms and implications for motor rehabilitation and athletic development.

Authors:  Jamie Tallent; Alex Woodhead; Ashlyn K Frazer; Jessica Hill; Dawson J Kidgell; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Time course of strength adaptations following high-intensity resistance training in individuals with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A Manca; Z Dvir; D Dragone; G Mureddu; G Bua; Franca Deriu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Corticospinal and transcallosal modulation of unilateral and bilateral contractions of lower limbs.

Authors:  Jakob Škarabot; Ruben Perellón Alfonso; Neil Cronin; Jure Bon; Vojko Strojnik; Janne Avela
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Short-interval intracortical inhibition of the biceps brachii in chronic-resistance versus non-resistance-trained individuals.

Authors:  Behzad Lahouti; Evan J Lockyer; Shawn Wiseman; Kevin E Power; Duane C Button
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Chronic resistance training: is it time to rethink the time course of neural contributions to strength gain?

Authors:  G E P Pearcey; S Alizedah; K E Power; D C Button
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Enhanced Corticospinal Excitability and Volitional Drive in Response to Shortening and Lengthening Strength Training and Changes Following Detraining.

Authors:  Jamie Tallent; Stuart Goodall; Karl C Gibbon; Tibor Hortobágyi; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Modulation of the Hoffmann reflex in the tibialis anterior with a change in posture.

Authors:  Janelle Unger; Justin W Andrushko; Alison R Oates; Doug W Renshaw; Trevor S Barss; E Paul Zehr; Jonathan P Farthing
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-07

Review 8.  The Combined Influences of Exercise, Diet and Sleep on Neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Jacob W Pickersgill; Claudia V Turco; Karishma Ramdeo; Ravjot S Rehsi; Stevie D Foglia; Aimee J Nelson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-26

9.  Differences in supraspinal and spinal excitability during various force outputs of the biceps brachii in chronic- and non-resistance trained individuals.

Authors:  Gregory E P Pearcey; Kevin E Power; Duane C Button
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Compound maximal motor unit response is modulated by contraction intensity, but not contraction type in tibialis anterior.

Authors:  Jamie Tallent; Stuart Goodall; Dawson J Kidgell; Rade Durbaba; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.