Literature DB >> 23721679

Discordance in couples' reporting of courtship stages: Implications for measurement and marital quality.

Sarah Halpern-Meekin1, Laura Tach.   

Abstract

The symbolism of rituals creates a shared understanding of events among group members. In the context of romantic relationships, a shared understanding of relationship status transitions may be associated with greater commitment and higher quality relationships. We argue that couples with differing retrospective accounts of their premarital courtship may not have had clear discussions or rituals marking relationship turning points. We test the association between discordance in couples' reports of premarital courtship stages and marital quality using data from married couples in a national online survey (n=1504). We find that couple discordance is common, particularly among former premarital cohabitors and for the less institutionalized relationship stages of dating and stayovers, and is associated with lower marital quality. Implications for relationship measurement and the meaning of couple discordance are discussed.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Year:  2013        PMID: 23721679     DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Res        ISSN: 0049-089X


  3 in total

1.  Measuring Cohabitation in U.S. National Surveys.

Authors:  Wendy D Manning; Kara Joyner; Paul Hemez; Cassandra Cupka
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2019-08

2.  Transitions From Sexual Relationships Into Cohabitation and Beyond.

Authors:  Sharon Sassler; Katherine Michelmore; Zhenchao Qian
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2018-04

3.  Husbands' and wives' discordant self-reports on couple-level variables: implications for data analysis.

Authors:  Mariana Amorim; Susana Silva; Milton Severo; Michelle Kelly-Irving; Catarina Samorinha; Elisabete Alves
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2019-08-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.