Literature DB >> 23721172

The effectiveness of Coxiella burnetii vaccines in occupationally exposed populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

T J O'Neill1, J M Sargeant, Z Poljak.   

Abstract

To estimate the effect of vaccination in preventing acute Q fever in individuals occupationally exposed to Coxiella burnetii, a systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken in controlled trials and observational studies. Publications were obtained through a scoping study of English and non-English articles, and those reporting a commercially licensed or licensable vaccine compared with an unvaccinated or placebo control group were included in the review. Two authors performed independent assessment of risk of systematic error and data extraction. One controlled trial and five cohort publications met the inclusion criteria. All trials used a Henzerling phase I vaccine. A random-effects meta-analysis estimated significant protection in abattoir workers (RR = 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.22) compared with the control individuals. In individuals with rare or sporadic contact with the abattoir, a significant benefit of vaccination was also found (RR = 0.06; 95% CI 0-0.93). Overall, the vaccine effectively prevented acute Q fever in individuals responsible for handling animals or their products and those working in the abattoir but not directly exposed to animals (RR = 0.06; 95% CI 0.02-0.18). Caution must be taken when interpreting the effect of C. burnetii vaccination as significant heterogeneity amongst publications was observed. A meta-regression found no significant univariate associations. This may reflect the uncertainty provided by reported data in the cohort publications. Potential systematic biases were present in the publications, and evidence included may not be sufficiently robust to extrapolate the effect of vaccination on occupationally exposed groups beyond the population of abattoir employees in Australia where all included studies occurred.
© 2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coxiella burnetii; Human vaccine; Q fever; meta-analysis; occupationally exposed; systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23721172     DOI: 10.1111/zph.12054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  6 in total

1.  Instrumentation of Near-term Fetal Sheep for Multivariate Chronic Non-anesthetized Recordings.

Authors:  Patrick Burns; Hai Lun Liu; Shikha Kuthiala; Gilles Fecteau; André Desrochers; Lucien Daniel Durosier; Mingju Cao; Martin G Frasch
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Trends and risk factors for human Q fever in Australia, 1991-2014.

Authors:  T S Sloan-Gardner; P D Massey; P Hutchinson; K Knope; E Fearnley
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.434

3.  Q fever prevention and vaccination: Australian livestock farmers' knowledge and attitudes to inform a One Health approach.

Authors:  Md Rezanur Rahaman; Helen Marshall; Adriana Milazzo; Deane Crabb; Peng Bi
Journal:  One Health       Date:  2021-03-05

4.  Exposure of South African Abattoir Workers to Coxiella burnetii.

Authors:  Liesl De Boni; Sumaya Mall; Veerle Msimang; Alex de Voux; Jennifer Rossouw; John Frean
Journal:  Trop Med Infect Dis       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 5.  Q fever is an old and neglected zoonotic disease in Kenya: a systematic review.

Authors:  J Njeru; K Henning; M W Pletz; R Heller; H Neubauer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Seroprevlance of Coxiella burnetii among abattoir and slaughterhouse workers: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Solomon M Woldeyohannes; Charles F Gilks; Peter Baker; Nigel R Perkins; Simon A Reid
Journal:  One Health       Date:  2018-10-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.