| Literature DB >> 23721065 |
Ren-Hua Na1, Guo-Hui Zhu, Ji-Xuan Luo, Xiao-Jing Meng, Liwang Cui, Hong-Juan Peng, Xiao-Guang Chen, Julian Gomez-Cambronero.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: GTPases are the family of hydrolases that bind and hydrolyze guanosine triphosphate. The large Immunity-related GTPases and the small GTPase ADP-ribosylation factor-6 in host cells are known to accumulate on the parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM) of Toxoplasma gondii and play critical roles in this parasite infection, but these GTPases cannot explain the full extent of infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23721065 PMCID: PMC3681593 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
The mutation primers used to generate all the mutants
| M1 (RhoAΔ1-10) | pECFP-RhoA WT (1-10aa deleted) | forward: 5’-GTCGACGATTTCGACGTTGGTGATGGAGCC-3’ |
| reverse: 5’-GGCTCCATCACCAACGTCGAAATCGTCGAC-3’, | ||
| M2 (RhoAΔ11-20) | pECFP-RhoA WT (11-20aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-CGGAAGAAACTGGTGATTTTGCTCATAGTTAACAGC-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’- GCTGTTAACTATGAGCAAAATCACCAGTTTCTTCCG-3’ | ||
| M3 (RhoAΔ21-30) | pECFP-RhoA WT (21-30aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-CTGTGGAAAGACATGCCCAGAGGTGTATGTGC-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’- GCACATACACCTCTGGGCATGTCTTTCCACAG-3’ | ||
| M4 (RhoAΔ31-40) | pECFP-RhoA WT (31-40aa deleted) | Forward: 5’- GCGAGGACCAGTTCAACTATGTGGCAG-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’- CTGCCACATAGTTGAACTGGTCCTCGC-3’ | ||
| M5 (RhoAΔ41-50) | pECFP-RhoA WT (41-50aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-GCCCACAGTGTTTGAGAAGCAGGTAGAGTTGG-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’- CCAACTCTACCTGCTTCTCAAACACTGTGGGC-3’ | ||
| M6 (RhoAΔ51-60) | pECFP-RhoA WT (51-60aa deleted) | Mutant 6 Forward: 5’-CGAGGTGGATGGAGCTGGGCTGGAAG-3’ |
| Mutant 6 Reverse: 5’- CTTCCAGCCCAGCTCCATCCACCTCG -3’ | ||
| M7 (RhoAΔ61-70) | pECFP-RhoA WT (61-70aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-CTTTGTGGGACACACCCCTCTCCTACCC-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’-GGGTAGGAGAGGGGTGTGTCCCACAAAG-3’ | ||
| M8 (RhoAΔ71-80) | pECFP-RhoA WT (71-80aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-GATTATGATCGCCTGAGGCTGATGTGTTTTTCCATC-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’- GATGGAAAAACACATCAGCCTCAGGCGATCATAATC-3’ | ||
| M9 (RhoAΔ81-90) | pECFP-RhoA WT (81-90aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-CCCAGATACCGATGTTATAAGTTTAGAAAACATCCCAG-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’-CTGGGATGTTTTCTAAACTTATAACATCGGTATCTGGG-3’ | ||
| M10 (RhoAΔ91-100) | pECFP-RhoA WT (91-100aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-CGACAGCCCTGATCCAGAAGTCAAGC-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’- GCTTGACTTCTGGATCAGGGCTGTCG-3’ | ||
| M11 (RhoAΔ101-110) | pECFP-RhoA WT (101-110aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-CAGAAAAGTGGACCCCCATCATCCTGG-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’-CCAGGATGATGGGGGTCCACTTTTCTG-3’ | ||
| M12 (RhoAΔ111-120) | pECFP-RhoA WT (111-120aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-CTGTCCCAACGTGCTTCGGAATGATG-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’- CATCATTCCGAAGCACGTTGGGACAG-3’ | ||
| M13 (RhoAΔ121-130) | pECFP-RhoA WT (121-130aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-GTTGGGAATAAGAAGGATCTAGCCAAGATGAAGCAG-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’-CTGCTTCATCTTGGCTAGATCCTTCTTATTCCCAAC-3’ | ||
| M14 (RhoAΔ131-140) | pECFP-RhoA WT (131-140aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-CACACAAGGCGGGAGCCTGAAGAAGGCAG-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’-CTGCCTTCTTCAGGCTCCCGCCTTGTGTG-3 | ||
| M15 (RhoAΔ141-150) | pECFP-RhoA WT (141-150aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-GGAGCCGGTGAAAATTGGCGCTTTTG-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’- CAAAAGCGCCAATTTTCACCGGCTCC-3’ | ||
| M16 (RhoAΔ151-160) | pECFP-RhoA WT (151-160aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-GAGATATGGCAAACAGGGCAAAGACCAAAGATGG-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’- CCATCTTTGGTCTTTGCCCTGTTTGCCATATCTC-3’ | ||
| M17 (RhoAΔ161-170) | pECFP-RhoA WT (161-170aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-GTGCATGGAGTGTTCATTTGAAATGGCTACG-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’- CGTAGCCATTTCAAATGAACACTCCATGCAC-3’ | ||
| M18 (RhoAΔ171-180) | pECFP-RhoA WT (171-180aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-GGAGTGAGAGAGGTTGCTAGACGTGGGAAG-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’- CTTCCCACGTCTAGCAACCTCTCTCACTCC-3’ | ||
| M19 (RhoAΔ181-192) | pECFP-RhoA WT (181-192aa deleted) | Forward: 5’-GAGCTGCTCTGCAACTTGTCTTGCCGCG-3’ |
| Reverse: 5’- CGCGGCAAGACAAGTTGCAGAGCAGCTC-3’ |
Figure 1The accumulation of Rho GTPases in the parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM) of tachyzoites (1000×). (A) The tachyzoites of T. gondii RH strain infected human 16-HBE cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde and permeablized with Triton X-100. The anti-RhoA and Rac1 primary antibodies were used to bind with the endogenous GTPases, then a FITC conjugated secondary antibody was used to bind with the primary antibodies. The endogenous RhoA and Rac1 accumulated on the PVM are visualized with a fluorescence microscope. (B-C) COS-7 cells were transfected with 3 μg of pECFP-N1-RhoA-WT and pECFP-N1-Rac1-WT, respectively. Forty-eight hr after transfection, these cells were infected with tachyzoites of T. gondii RH strain (B) or Pru strain (C). Regardless of the virulence of the tachyzoites used for infection, the overexpressed CFP-RhoA and CFP-Rac1 in host cells were recruited to the T. gondii PVM. Bars: 10 μm.
Figure 2The real-time observation of RhoA GTPase being recruited to the parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM) following tachyzoites invasion (1000×). (A-F) Starting from 0 min after the tachyzoites being added to the COS-7 cells transfected with pECFP-RhoA-WT, the invasion of tachyzoites into the host cell was visualized under a confocal microscope and pictures were taken at 5 min intervals. The CFP-tagged RhoA on the host cell membrane is recruited to the PVM at the same time as the tachyzoites started to invade the host cell (A, pink arrowhead). The accumulation of the RhoA to the PVM continued with the invasion of the tachyzoite into the host cell (B-D, pink arrowhead), until the whole tachyzoite was totally recruited into the host cell (E, white and yellow arrowhead). The loading of the RhoA GTPase onto the PVM continued after the tachyzoite was totally within the host cell, in this case, probably through the means of diffusion from the host cell cytosol (E-H, white and yellow arrowhead). The green fluorescence and the DIC images showing the observation of the invasion processes are provided in Additional file 1: Data S1 and Additional file 2: Data S2. Bar: 10 μm.
Figure 3The recruitment of RhoA and Rac1 GTPases into parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM) is dependent on the GTPase activity (1000×). (A) The CFP-tagged dominant negative mutants RhoA N19 and Rac1 N17 were overexpressed in COS-7 cells and 48 hr post-transfection, the cells were infected with T. gondii RH tachyzoites. All of these mutant proteins did not accumulate on the PVM of T. gondii (arrowhead). (B) The CFP-tagged wild type RhoA and Rac1 were overexpressed in COS-7 cells and 48 hr post-transfection, the cells were infected with T. gondii RH tachyzoites. All of these wild-type proteins accumulated on the PVM of T. gondii (arrowhead). Bars: 10 μm.
Figure 4Detection of RhoA and Rac1 activation in human 16HBE cells following tachyzoites infection with Rho GST Pull-down assay. T. gondii RH tachyzoites infected human 16-HBE cells and uninfected cells were harvested and lysed. About 150 μg of the total protein from these two cell lysates was used in Rho pulldown assay. GST-tagged Rhotekin-RBD protein on agarose beads for RhoA or GST-tagged PAK-PBD protein bound agarose beads for Rac were used to bind and precipitate only the active form of RhoA or Rac1 in the cell lysate. In the Western-blot, actin was used as the equal protein loading control. The negative control group cell lysate which was pre-incubated with GDP showed no band on the Western-blot membrane. The more intense bands found in the infected cells for anti-RhoA and anti-Rac1 compared to the uninfected cells indicated that more GTP-bound RhoA or Rac1 were precipitated from the infected cell lysate, which were activated upon T. gondii invasion.
Figure 5The recruitment of RhoA to PVM is dependent on different RhoA domains (1000×). COS-7 cells were transfected with 3 μg of pEGFP-N1-RhoA mutants’ plasmids M1-M19, respectively. Forty-eight hr post-transfection, the cells were infected with RH strain tachyzoites of T. gondii. M2 (RhoAΔ11–20), M3 (RhoAΔ21–30), M4 (RhoAΔ31–40), M7 (RhoAΔ61–70) and M17 (RhoAΔ161–170) were found not to accumulate on the PVM (white arrowhead and white labeling), indicating that the integrity of the features (F) as follows are essential for the recruitment of RhoA to the PVM: F1-GTP/Mg2+ binding site [chemical binding site], F-7:mDia effector interaction site, F-10:G1 box, F-11:G2 box, F-14:G5 box. The other mutants were all equally well recruited to the PVM as RhoA wild-type (yellow arrowhead in M5 is representative, and the other mutants information is provided in Additional file 3: Data S3), indicating that the other motifs of RhoA such as F2-GAP (GTPase-activating protein) interaction site [polypeptide binding site], F3-GEF (guanine nucleotide exchange factor) interaction site [polypeptide binding site], F4-GDI (guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor) interaction site [polypeptide binding site], F5-Rho kinase (ROCK) effector interaction site [polypeptide binding site], F6-PKN/PRK1 effector interaction site, F8-Switch I region, F9-Switch II region, F12-G3 box and F13-G4 box, are not the decisive motifs for the recruitment of RhoA to the PVM. Bar: 10 μm.
Figure 6The CFP-tagged Rho and Rac1 GTPases accumulated on the parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM) do not translocate toward epithelial growth factor (EGF) activation. Two paralleled groups of COS-7 cells were grown on coverslips and transfected with pECFP-RhoA and pECFP-Rac1 respectively. Forty-eight hr post-transfection, cells were starved overnight in serum-free DMEM. One group of cells was infected with T. gondii tachyzoites and the other group was kept uninfected. One hr post-infection, the infected cells were washed 3× with PBS to remove the unrecruited tachyzoites. Cells were site-activated with EGF for 5 min. (A) In uninfected cells, the CFP-tagged RhoA and Rac1 GTPases in the cytosol translocated to the host cell membrane (white arrowhead) in response to EGF activation. (B) In infected cells, the CFP-tagged RhoA and Rac1 were sequestered on the PVM without translocation toward the EGF, while the unassociated RhoA and Rac1 in the cytosol still translocated toward the EGF as in uninfected cells. More photographs provided in Additional file 4: Data S4 showing the RhoA and Rac1 sequestered on the PVM regardless the activation of EGF. Bar: 10 μm.
Figure 7The overexpression of dominant negative mutants of Rho GTPases and the expression silencing of Rho GTPases in host cells diminished the invasiveness of RH tachyzoites. (A-B) RhoA or Rac1 overexpression: When compared with the untransfected cells (mock group), RhoA-WT or Rac1-WT overexpressed cells showed the almost same infection rate, while dominant-negative mutant RhoA-N19 or Rac1 N17 overexpressed cells showed a significantly lower infection rate (P = 0.001 and P = 0.005), proximately 60% of the Mock. (C) Silencing of RhoA or Rac1: When compared with the untransfected cells (mock group) and negative control siRNA transfected groups, cells transfected with RhoA siRNA, Rac1 siRNA or RhoA + Rac1 siRNA showed a significantly lower infection rate (P < 0.001). It was about 65% of the Mock in the two single knockdown groups and about 50% of the Mock in the double knockdown group. (D-E) Detection of RhoA or Rac1 RNAi efficiency: anti-actin panel showed the same amount of total protein was loaded for detection in different cell lysates including mock, negative control siRNA, RhoA or RAC1 siRNA, and RhoA + Rac1 siRNA transfected groups. Anti-RhoA panel showed the apparent inhibition of RhoA expression in RhoA silenced and RhoA + Rac1 silenced cells; anti-Rac1 panel showed the apparent inhibition of Rac1 expression in Rac1 and RhoA + Rac1 silenced cells.
Figure 8Cell signaling related to RhoA and Rac1 regulated cytoskeleton reorganization in infection. c-Src is activated by EGF induced EGF receptor activation and followed by Ephexin, VAV-2 and Tiam 1 phosphorylation. Ephexin phosphorylation promotes its GTPase activity toward RhoA and ROCK. ROCK directly phosphorylates LIMK1 and LIMK2, which in turn phosphorylate destrin and cofilin. ROCK2 phosphorylates CRMP2, and CRMP2 phosphorylation reduces its tubulin-heterodimer binding and the promotion of microtubule assembly. Activation of VAV-2 activates RhoA and Rac1. In the downstream of Rac1, p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) activates LIMK1 and regulates the actin cytoskeletal reorganization through the phosphorylation of the actin-depolymerizing factor cofilin and destrin. PAK1 also phosphorylates Arp2/3 complex to promote actin polymerization. Cortactin is a prominent target of c-Src, and regulates cytoskeletal dynamics. Tyrosine phosphorylation of cortactin reduces its F-actin cross-linking capability. In our research, we are not clear about the upstream of the RhoA and Rac1 GTPases cell signaling involved in T. gondii infection, but we can see the activation of RhoA and Rac1 of host cells and the reorganization of the cytoskeleton for PV formation. RhoA and Rac1 GTPases accumulate on the PMV regardless of the parasitic strain virulence, and the accumulation is dependent on their GTPase activity. The recruited RhoA or Rac1 on the PVM are probably in GTP-bound active form. The RhoA GTPase is recruited to the PVM as soon as the T. gondii tachyzoite invaded the host cell either through the host cell membrane or from the cytosol. The decisive domains for the RhoA accumulation on the PVM includes the GTP/Mg2+ binding site (F1), the mDia effector interaction site, the G1 box (G1), the G2 box (G2) and the G5 box (G5). The reorganization of host cell cytoskeleton facilitates the formation and enlargement of T. gondii PV in the host cell.