Literature DB >> 23720363

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization are complementary techniques to detect cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma.

Donat Alpar1, Danielle de Jong, Zsofia Holczer-Nagy, Bela Kajtar, Suvi Savola, Pal Jakso, Marianna David, Szabolcs Kosztolanyi, Laszlo Kereskai, Laszlo Pajor, Karoly Szuhai.   

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a genetically heterogeneous disease with diverse clinical outcomes. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (i-FISH) is the most commonly used approach to detect recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities in this malignancy. We aimed to assess the performance of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) to reveal copy number abnormalities (CNAs) in MM. Diagnostic bone marrow samples from 81 patients were analyzed using 42 MLPA probes for the following regions: 1p32-31, 1p21, 1q21.3, 1q23.3, 5q31.3, 12p13.31, 13q14, 16q12, 16q23, and 17p13. All samples were also screened by i-FISH for the presence of hyperdiploidy, deletion/monosomy of chromosome 13, deletion of TP53, disruption of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene, t(4;14), t(11;14), t(14;16), t(8;14), gain of 5q and abnormalities of chromosome 1. A total of 245 alterations were detected in 79 cases (98%). Investigating the same aberrations, the two methods showed a congruency of higher than 90%. A low proportion of cells with the relevant abnormality, focal CNAs and unmatched probes were responsible for the discrepancies. MLPA revealed 95 CNAs not detected by i-FISH providing additional information in 53 cases (65%). Scrutiny of CNAs on chromosome 1, using more than 20 probes, revealed significant heterogeneity in size and location, and variable intra-chromosomal and intra-clonal rates of loss or gain. Our results suggest that MLPA is a reliable high-throughput technique to detect CNAs in MM. Since balanced aberrations are key to prognostic classification of this disease, MLPA and i-FISH should be applied as complementary techniques in diagnostic pathology.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23720363     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  8 in total

1.  Cytogenetic testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization is improved by plasma cell sorting in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jihye Ha; Hyunsoo Cho; Taek Gyu Lee; Saeam Shin; Haerim Chung; Ji Eun Jang; Soo-Jeong Kim; June-Won Cheong; Seung-Tae Lee; Jin Seok Kim; Jong Rak Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  APOBEC family mutational signatures are associated with poor prognosis translocations in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Brian A Walker; Christopher P Wardell; Alex Murison; Eileen M Boyle; Dil B Begum; Nasrin M Dahir; Paula Z Proszek; Lorenzo Melchor; Charlotte Pawlyn; Martin F Kaiser; David C Johnson; Ya-Wei Qiang; John R Jones; David A Cairns; Walter M Gregory; Roger G Owen; Gordon Cook; Mark T Drayson; Graham H Jackson; Faith E Davies; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  The Utilization of Karyotyping, iFISH, and MLPA for the Detection of Recurrence Genetic Aberrations in Multiple Myeloma

Authors:  Suchada Sommaluan; Budsaba Rerkamnuaychoke; Teeraya Pauwilai; Suporn Chancharunee; Preeyaporn Onsod; Pitichai Pornsarayuth; Takol Chareonsirisuthigul; Rachaneekorn Tammachote; Teerapong Siriboonpiputtana
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-11-26

4.  Coexistent hyperdiploidy does not abrogate poor prognosis in myeloma with adverse cytogenetics and may precede IGH translocations.

Authors:  Charlotte Pawlyn; Lorenzo Melchor; Alex Murison; Christopher P Wardell; Annamaria Brioli; Eileen M Boyle; Martin F Kaiser; Brian A Walker; Dil B Begum; Nasrin B Dahir; Paula Proszek; Walter M Gregory; Mark T Drayson; Graham H Jackson; Fiona M Ross; Faith E Davies; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 25.476

5.  A molecular diagnostic approach able to detect the recurrent genetic prognostic factors typical of presenting myeloma.

Authors:  Eileen M Boyle; Paula Z Proszek; Martin F Kaiser; Dil Begum; Nasrin Dahir; Suvi Savola; Christopher P Wardell; Xavier Leleu; Fiona M Ross; Laura Chiecchio; Gordon Cook; Mark T Drayson; Richard G Owen; John M Ashcroft; Graham H Jackson; James Anthony Child; Faith E Davies; Brian A Walker; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Detection of recurrent cytogenetic aberrations in multiple myeloma: a comparison between MLPA and iFISH.

Authors:  Meirong Zang; Dehui Zou; Zhen Yu; Fei Li; Shuhua Yi; Xiaofei Ai; Xiaoqi Qin; Xiaoyan Feng; Wen Zhou; Yan Xu; Zengjun Li; Mu Hao; Weiwei Sui; Shuhui Deng; Chirag Acharya; Yaozhong Zhao; Kun Ru; Lugui Qiu; Gang An
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-27

7.  Combined Selection System to Lower the Cutoff for Plasma Cell Enrichment Applied to iFISH Analysis in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Cristina Mansilla; Elena Soria; Miren Vallejo; Alberto Valiente; Aránzazu Perez-Juana; Amaya Zabalza; Guillermina Hurtado; Francisco Sala; Natalia Ramírez
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  Mutational Spectrum, Copy Number Changes, and Outcome: Results of a Sequencing Study of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloma.

Authors:  Brian A Walker; Eileen M Boyle; Christopher P Wardell; Alex Murison; Dil B Begum; Nasrin M Dahir; Paula Z Proszek; David C Johnson; Martin F Kaiser; Lorenzo Melchor; Lauren I Aronson; Matthew Scales; Charlotte Pawlyn; Fabio Mirabella; John R Jones; Annamaria Brioli; Aneta Mikulasova; David A Cairns; Walter M Gregory; Ana Quartilho; Mark T Drayson; Nigel Russell; Gordon Cook; Graham H Jackson; Xavier Leleu; Faith E Davies; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 44.544

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.