Literature DB >> 23720069

Tumor volume adds prognostic value in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.

Kwang Hyun Kim1, Sey Kiat Lim, Tae-Young Shin, Dae Ryong Kang, Woong Kyu Han, Byung Ha Chung, Koon Ho Rha, Sung Joon Hong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the independent prognostic value of tumor volume (TV) and whether adding TV provides additional prognostic information for predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 1,129 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between July 2005 and July 2011. TV was categorized as minimal (≤1.0 ml), moderate (1.1-5.0 ml), or extensive (>5.0 ml). Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of BCR. The predictive accuracies of Cox's proportional hazard regression models with and without TV were quantified and compared using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
RESULTS: Increasing TV was associated with higher prostate specific antigen, pathological Gleason score, and pathologic tumor stage. TV was an independent predictor of BCR in multivariate analysis (p<0.001). When patients were stratified by organ-confined and nonorgan-confined tumor groups, TV remained an independent predictor of BCR in organ-confined tumors (p<0.001). In the nonorgan-confined tumor group, a significant difference was found only between extensive versus minimal TV (p=0.023). The predictive accuracy of the Cox regression model increased significantly by adding TV in organ-confined tumor group (0.748 vs. 0.704, p<0.05) but not in nonorgan-confined group (0.742 vs. 0.734, p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: TV was an independent prognostic predictor of BCR in organ-confined prostate cancers and provided additional prognostic information with increased predictive accuracy. In contrast, TV did not increase the predictive accuracy in nonorgan-confined tumor. TV should be considered as a prognosticator in organ-confined tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23720069     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3016-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  8 in total

1.  Specific spatial distribution patterns of tumor foci are associated with a low risk of biochemical recurrence in pT2pN0R0 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Okyaz Eminaga; Mahmoud Abbas; Olaf Bettendorf; Axel Semjonow
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Do tumor volume, percent tumor volume predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Meng; He Li; Peng Xu; Jia Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-12-15

3.  Total intraglandular and index tumor volumes predict biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Su-Jin Shin; Cheol Keun Park; Sung Yoon Park; Won Sik Jang; Joo Yong Lee; Young Deuk Choi; Nam Hoon Cho
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Prostate cancer risk alleles are associated with prostate cancer volume and prostate size.

Authors:  Daniel Reinhardt; Brian T Helfand; Phillip R Cooper; Kimberly A Roehl; William J Catalona; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Prospective comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and qualitative in-house categorization system in detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sonia Gaur; Stephanie Harmon; Sherif Mehralivand; Sandra Bednarova; Brian P Calio; Dordaneh Sugano; Abhinav Sidana; Maria J Merino; Peter A Pinto; Bradford J Wood; Joanna H Shih; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Predicting Biochemical Failure in Irradiated Patients With Prostate Cancer by Tumour Volume Measured by Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Benedict Oerther; Moritz V Buren; Christina M Klein; Simon Kirste; Nils H Nicolay; Tanja Sprave; Simon Spohn; Deepa Darshini Gunashekar; Leonard Hagele; Lars Bielak; Michael Bock; Anca-L Grosu; Fabian Bamberg; Matthias Benndorf; Constantinos Zamboglou
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  A prospective study evaluating indirect MRI-signs for the prediction of extraprostatic disease in patients with prostate cancer: tumor volume, tumor contact length and tumor apparent diffusion coefficient.

Authors:  Erik Rud; Lien Diep; Eduard Baco
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Effect of observation size and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in PI-RADS v2.1 assessment category 4 and 5 observations compared to adverse pathological outcomes.

Authors:  Jorge Abreu-Gomez; Daniel Walker; Tareq Alotaibi; Matthew D F McInnes; Trevor A Flood; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.