PURPOSE: Agents that target the epigenome show activity in breast cancer models. In preclinical studies, the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat induces cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and differentiation. We evaluated biomarker modulation in breast cancer tissues obtained from women with newly diagnosed invasive disease who received vorinostat and those who did not. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tumor specimens were collected from 25 women who received up to 6 doses of oral vorinostat 300 mg twice daily and from 25 untreated controls in a nonrandomized study. Candidate gene expression was analyzed by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) using the Oncotype DX 21-gene assay, and by immunohistochemistry for Ki-67 and cleaved caspase-3. Matched samples from treated women were analyzed for gene methylation by quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR (QM-MSP). Wilcoxon nonparametric tests were used to compare changes in quantitative gene expression levels pre- and post-vorinostat with changes in expression in untreated controls, and changes in gene methylation between pre- and post-vorinostat samples. RESULTS: Vorinostat was well tolerated and there were no study-related delays in treatment. Compared with untreated controls, there were statistically significant decreases in the expression of proliferation-associated genes Ki-67 (P = 0.003), STK15 (P = 0.005), and Cyclin B1 (P = 0.03) following vorinostat, but not in other genes by the Oncotype DX assay, or in expression of Ki-67 or cleaved caspase-3 by immunohistochemistry. Changes in methylation were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term vorinostat administration is associated with a significant decrease in expression of proliferation-associated genes in untreated breast cancers. This demonstration of biologic activity supports investigation of vorinostat in combination with other agents for the management of breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Agents that target the epigenome show activity in breast cancer models. In preclinical studies, the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat induces cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and differentiation. We evaluated biomarker modulation in breast cancer tissues obtained from women with newly diagnosed invasive disease who received vorinostat and those who did not. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Tumor specimens were collected from 25 women who received up to 6 doses of oral vorinostat 300 mg twice daily and from 25 untreated controls in a nonrandomized study. Candidate gene expression was analyzed by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) using the Oncotype DX 21-gene assay, and by immunohistochemistry for Ki-67 and cleaved caspase-3. Matched samples from treated women were analyzed for gene methylation by quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR (QM-MSP). Wilcoxon nonparametric tests were used to compare changes in quantitative gene expression levels pre- and post-vorinostat with changes in expression in untreated controls, and changes in gene methylation between pre- and post-vorinostat samples. RESULTS:Vorinostat was well tolerated and there were no study-related delays in treatment. Compared with untreated controls, there were statistically significant decreases in the expression of proliferation-associated genes Ki-67 (P = 0.003), STK15 (P = 0.005), and Cyclin B1 (P = 0.03) following vorinostat, but not in other genes by the Oncotype DX assay, or in expression of Ki-67 or cleaved caspase-3 by immunohistochemistry. Changes in methylation were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term vorinostat administration is associated with a significant decrease in expression of proliferation-associated genes in untreated breast cancers. This demonstration of biologic activity supports investigation of vorinostat in combination with other agents for the management of breast cancer.
Authors: Leonard A Cohen; Paul A Marks; Richard A Rifkind; Shantu Amin; Dhimant Desai; Brian Pittman; Victoria M Richon Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2002 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Wm Kevin Kelly; Victoria M Richon; Owen O'Connor; Tracy Curley; Barbara MacGregor-Curtelli; William Tong; Mark Klang; Lawrence Schwartz; Stacie Richardson; Eddie Rosa; Marija Drobnjak; Carlos Cordon-Cordo; Judy H Chiao; Richard Rifkind; Paul A Marks; Howard Scher Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-09-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: P N Munster; K T Thurn; S Thomas; P Raha; M Lacevic; A Miller; M Melisko; R Ismail-Khan; H Rugo; M Moasser; S E Minton Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Lauren L Atwell; Laura M Beaver; Jackilen Shannon; David E Williams; Roderick H Dashwood; Emily Ho Journal: Curr Pharmacol Rep Date: 2015-04-01
Authors: Lauren L Atwell; Zhenzhen Zhang; Motomi Mori; Paige Farris; John T Vetto; Arpana M Naik; Karen Y Oh; Philippe Thuillier; Emily Ho; Jackilen Shannon Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2015-10-28
Authors: Ferdinando Chiaradonna; Iros Barozzi; Claudia Miccolo; Gabriele Bucci; Roberta Palorini; Lorenzo Fornasari; Oronza A Botrugno; Giancarlo Pruneri; Michele Masullo; Alfonso Passafaro; Viviana E Galimberti; Valeria R Fantin; Victoria M Richon; Salvatore Pece; Giuseppe Viale; Pier Paolo Di Fiore; Giulio Draetta; Pier Giuseppe Pelicci; Saverio Minucci; Susanna Chiocca Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2015-05-27 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Apurva K Srivastava; Soumya Jaganathan; Laurie Stephen; Melinda G Hollingshead; Adam Layhee; Eric Damour; Jeevan Prasaad Govindharajulu; Jennifer Donohue; Dominic Esposito; James P Mapes; Robert J Kinders; Naoko Takebe; Joseph E Tomaszewski; Shivaani Kummar; James H Doroshow; Ralph E Parchment Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Robert Kinders; Kate Ferry-Galow; Lihua Wang; Apurva K Srivastava; Jiuping Jay Ji; Ralph E Parchment Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Fahimeh Falahi; Michel van Kruchten; Nadine Martinet; Geke A P Hospers; Marianne G Rots Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 6.466