| Literature DB >> 23718873 |
Caroline C Xu1, Vincent L Biron, Lakshmi Puttagunta, Hadi Seikaly.
Abstract
INTRODUCTIONS: The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCCs) is rising in developed nations. Studies have shown that these virally mediated tumours are epidemiologically, clinically, and biologically different than other head and neck squamous cell carcinomas and traditional concepts of field cancerization may not apply to HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23718873 PMCID: PMC3668914 DOI: 10.1186/1916-0216-42-36
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ISSN: 1916-0208
Summary of patient demographic information by p16 status
| | | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average age | | 59.1 | ±10.9 | 55.9 | 60.7 | 0.003* |
| Sex | Male | 327 | 79.8% | 86.6% | 76.3% | 0.047* |
| | Female | 83 | 20.2% | | | |
| Smokers | | 281 | 68.5% | 63.5% | 86.8% | 0.0008* |
| Stage | IV | 308 | 78.8% | 75.6% | 80.0% | 0.49 |
| | III | 58 | 14.2% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 0.23 |
| | II | 26 | 6.3% | 2.5% | 3.7% | 0.68 |
| | I | 14 | 3.4% | 1.7% | 2.5% | 0.99 |
| Index tumour location | Tonsils | 213 | 68.7% | | | |
| | Base of the tongue | 90 | 29.0% | | | |
| | Oropharynx NOS | 15 | 4.8% | | | |
| | Soft palate | 18 | 5.8% | | | |
| | Pharyngeal walls | 15 | 4.8% | | | |
| Treatment | Surgery+ChemoRT | 143 | 34.9% | | | |
| | ChemoRT | 216 | 52.7% | | | |
| | Palliative | 16 | 3.9% | | | |
| | Salvage surgery | 11 | 2.7% | | | |
| | No treatment | 21 | 5.1% | | | |
| Follow-up (years) | 3.9 | ± 1.0 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 0.98 | |
p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. NOS = not otherwise specified.
Incidence rate of upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) and non-upper aerodigestive tract (non-UADT) second primary tumours by p16 status
| | | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| UADT | 0.7 | 8.5 | <0.0001* |
| | (0.3 – 1.4) | (5.7 – 12.4) | |
| Non-UADT | 0.9 | 2.1 | 0.116 |
| (0.9 – 4.7) | (0.4 – 1.8) | ||
p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Figure 1Site distribution of second primary tumours by p16 status.
Diagnostic yield of various imaging modalities for second primary tumours by p16 status
| | | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic work-up | | | |
| Whole-body PET-CT | 64 | 35 | |
| Panendoscopy | 80 | 53 | |
| SPTs identified | 4 | 9 | |
| Diagnostic yield | 2.8% | 10.2% | 0.02* |
p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Figure 2Proposed diagnostic algorithm for second primary tumours by p16 status.