Literature DB >> 23718693

Associations between the risk of tooth agenesis and single-nucleotide polymorphisms of MSX1 and PAX9 genes in nonsyndromic cleft patients.

Yu-Jin Seo1, Ji Wan Park, Young Ho Kim, Seung-Hak Baek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between the risk of tooth agenesis and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of MSX1 and PAX9 genes in nonsyndromic cleft patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The subjects were 126 Korean nonsyndromic cleft patients. Tooth agenesis type (TAT) was classified as none (0); cleft area (1); cleft area + other area (2); and other area (3) based on agenesis of the maxillary lateral incisor (MXLI) and another tooth within or outside the cleft area. TAT was further grouped into two subcategories (0 and 1) and four subcategories (0, 1, 2, and 3). Three SNPs of MSX1 and 10 SNPs of PAX9 were investigated using Fisher's exact test and logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Although the association between genotype distribution of PAX9-rs7142363 and TAT was significant (P < .05 in four subcategories), genotypic odds ratios (GORs) of SNPs in each TAT were not meaningful. However, for MSX1-rs12532 and PAX9-rs2073247, associations between genotypic distribution and TAT were significant (P < .01 in four subcategories and P < .05 in two subcategories; P < .01 in two subcategories, respectively). In cleft area, GORs of MXLI agenesis in genotypes GA of MSX1-rs12532 and CT of PAX9-rs2073247 were increased by 3.14-fold and 4.15-fold compared with genotype GG of MSX1-rs12532 and CC of PAX9-rs2073247, respectively (P <. 01; P < .05). In cleft area + other area, the GOR of agenesis of MXLI and another tooth in genotype AA of MSX1-rs12532 was increased by fivefold compared with genotype GG (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Genetic disturbances of MSX1 and PAX9 genes are associated with tooth agenesis within and outside the cleft area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23718693      PMCID: PMC8722836          DOI: 10.2319/020513-104.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  31 in total

1.  MSX1 and orofacial clefting with and without tooth agenesis.

Authors:  A Modesto; L M Moreno; K Krahn; S King; A C Lidral
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  A novel nonsense mutation in PAX9 is associated with marked variability in number of missing teeth.

Authors:  Lars Hansen; Sven Kreiborg; Henrik Jarlov; Erik Niebuhr; Hans Eiberg
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.612

3.  Novel nonsense mutation in MSX1 causes tooth agenesis with cleft lip in a Chinese family.

Authors:  Jia Liang; Lingling Zhu; Liuyan Meng; Dong Chen; Zhuan Bian
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 2.612

4.  Hypodontia in children with various types of clefts.

Authors:  Y Shapira; E Lubit; M M Kuftinec
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Association between PAX-9 promoter polymorphisms and hypodontia in humans.

Authors:  Regina C R Peres; Raquel M Scarel-Caminaga; Alexandre R do Espírito Santo; Sérgio R P Line
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.633

6.  PAX9 and MSX1 transcription factor genes in non-syndromic dental agenesis.

Authors:  Vanessa Rodrigues Paixão-Côrtes; Tatiana Braga; Francisco Mauro Salzano; Karina Mundstock; Carlos Alberto Mundstock; Maria Cátira Bortolini
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.633

7.  Genetic interactions between Pax9 and Msx1 regulate lip development and several stages of tooth morphogenesis.

Authors:  Mitsushiro Nakatomi; Xiu-Ping Wang; Darren Key; Jennifer J Lund; Annick Turbe-Doan; Ralf Kist; Andrew Aw; Yiping Chen; Richard L Maas; Heiko Peters
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  Dental development of Chinese children with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Moon Cheung Lai; Nigel M King; Hai Ming Wong
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2008-05

9.  Mutations in the human homeobox MSX1 gene in the congenital lack of permanent teeth.

Authors:  Elzbieta Pawlowska; Katarzyna Janik-Papis; Maria Wisniewska-Jarosinska; Joanna Szczepanska; Janusz Blasiak
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Association between polymorphism in the promoter region (G/C-915) of PAX9 gene and third molar agenesis.

Authors:  Fabio José Bianch; Tiago Franco de Oliveira; Cristiane Borges Pereira Saito; Regina Célia Rocha Peres; Sérgio Roberto Peres Line
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.698

View more
  7 in total

1.  Genetic variants in tooth agenesis-related genes might be also involved in tooth size variations.

Authors:  Arthur S Cunha; Luiza Vertuan Dos Santos; Guido Artemio Marañón-Vásquez; Christian Kirschneck; Jennifer Tsi Gerber; Maria Bernadete Stuani; Mírian Aiko Nakane Matsumoto; Alexandre Rezende Vieira; Rafaela Scariot; Erika Calvano Küchler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Tooth abnormalities associated with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gabriela Fonseca-Souza; Luiza Becker de Oliveira; Letícia Maira Wambier; Rafaela Scariot; Juliana Feltrin-Souza
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  Dental development in patients with and without unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP): a case control study.

Authors:  Julie Van Dyck; Giacomo Begnoni; Guy Willems; Annouschka Laenen; Patrick Thevissen; Anna Verdonck; Maria Cadenas de Llano-Pérula
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Tooth agenesis and orofacial clefting: genetic brothers in arms?

Authors:  M Phan; F Conte; K D Khandelwal; C W Ockeloen; T Bartzela; T Kleefstra; H van Bokhoven; M Rubini; H Zhou; C E L Carels
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Frequency of Additional Congenital Dental Anomalies in Children with Cleft Lip, Alveolar and Palate.

Authors:  Przemysław Pastuszak; Izabella Dunin-Wilczyńska; Agnieszka Lasota
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate: A multicenter study of the dental anomalies involved.

Authors:  Carlos Menezes; José-Alcides de Arruda; Leni-Verônica Silva; João-Luiz Monteiro; Pérola Caribé; Pamella Álvares; Maria-Cristina Almeida; José-Carlos Coelli; Fernanda Goldemberg; Marcia Silveira; Ana-Paula Sobral; Daniela-Franco Bueno
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-08-01

7.  Subphenotypes in Non-Syndromic Orofacial Cleft Patients Based on the Tooth Agenesis Code (TAC).

Authors:  Dimitrios Konstantonis; Maria Nassika; Maria Athanasiou; Heleni Vastardis
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.