| Literature DB >> 23716371 |
John A Decker1, Max Kiefer, Dori B Reissman, Renée Funk, John Halpin, Bruce Bernard, Richard L Ehrenberg, Christine R Schuler, Elizabeth Whelan, Kyle Myers, John Howard.
Abstract
Disasters often set the stage for scientific inquiry within the field of occupational safety and health. This is especially true when the long-term consequences of exposures associated with a particular disaster are unclear. However, a responder research study can be costly and difficult to design, and researchers must consider whether the proposed study will produce useful, reliable results and is a prudent public health investment. The decision process can be segregated into various components, including scientific rationale that should be formally recognized as critical to efficiently and effectively determine whether a research study is warranted. The scientific rationale includes certain controlling or "gatekeeper" factors that should be present to proceed with research.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23716371 PMCID: PMC4593614 DOI: 10.5055/ajdm.2013.0108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Disaster Med ISSN: 1932-149X