Literature DB >> 23716152

Excretory urography and renal scintigraphy for chronic obstructed kidney: does nonopacity mean nonsalvageability?

Alisa Klaipetch1, Sirianong Namwongprom, Molrudee Ekmahachai, Bannakij Lojanapiwat.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to ascertain whether nonopacified kidney on excretory urography (also known as intravenous urography [IVU]) indicates nonsalvageability.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 45 adult patients with chronic unilateral urinary tract obstruction, in whom IVU revealed nonopacified kidney on one side but normal excretion on the contralateral side. Affected kidneys with split glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 on 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid diuretic renal scintigraphy were considered nonsalvageable. Non-function was defined based on cutoff points (< 15% and < 20%) to determine the sensitivity and specificity of differential renal function. Differences in IVU and renal scintigraphy findings, with respect to the duration of delayed filming on IVU, were analysed for significance.
RESULTS: The results of IVU and renal scintigraphy findings for 34 (75.6%) nonopacified kidneys matched, representing nonsalvageable kidneys. Sensitivity and specificity of differential renal function were 76% and 100%, respectively, when the cutoff point for non-function was set at < 15%. Sensitivity and specificity were 97% and 82%, respectively, when the cutoff point was < 20%. There was no significant difference between renal scintigraphy findings and IVU with 2-hour and > 2-hour delayed films (p = 0.96).
CONCLUSION: Although most nonopacified kidneys on IVU were nonsalvageable, a quarter of them were found to be salvageable on renal scintigraphy. Besides split GFR, differential function at cutoff point < 15% could be used to determine non-function of a chronic obstructed kidney when the contralateral kidney is normal. Delayed filming beyond two hours appears unnecessary in ensuring non-excretion on IVU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23716152     DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2013106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  2 in total

1.  Do gynecologic oncology patients with severely diminished renal function and urinary tract obstruction benefit from ureteral stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy?

Authors:  Brooke Liang; Sara S Lange; L Stewart Massad; Rebecca Dick; Kathryn A Mills; Andrea R Hagemann; Carolyn K McCourt; Premal H Thaker; Katherine C Fuh; David G Mutch; Matthew A Powell; Lindsay M Kuroki
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-04-24

2.  Prognostic role of hydronephrosis in the treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Leandro Nóbrega; Jeferson Rodrigo Zanon; Carlos E Eduardo Mattos da Cunha Andrade; Ronaldo Luis Schmidt; Marcelo Henrique Dos Santos; Ricardo Dos Reis
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.661

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.