Literature DB >> 23716122

Cross-orientation masking in human color vision: application of a two-stage model to assess dichoptic and monocular sources of suppression.

Yeon Jin Kim1, Mina Gheiratmand, Kathy T Mullen.   

Abstract

Cross-orientation masking (XOM) occurs when the detection of a test grating is masked by a superimposed grating at an orthogonal orientation, and is thought to reveal the suppressive effects mediating contrast normalization. Medina and Mullen (2009) reported that XOM was greater for chromatic than achromatic stimuli at equivalent spatial and temporal frequencies. Here we address whether the greater suppression found in binocular color vision originates from a monocular or interocular site, or both. We measure monocular and dichoptic masking functions for red-green color contrast and achromatic contrast at three different spatial frequencies (0.375, 0.75, and 1.5 cpd, 2 Hz). We fit these functions with a modified two-stage masking model (Meese & Baker, 2009) to extract the monocular and interocular weights of suppression. We find that the weight of monocular suppression is significantly higher for color than achromatic contrast, whereas dichoptic suppression is similar for both. These effects are invariant across spatial frequency. We then apply the model to the binocular masking data using the measured values of the monocular and interocular sources of suppression and show that these are sufficient to account for color binocular masking. We conclude that the greater strength of chromatic XOM has a monocular origin that transfers through to the binocular site.

Entities:  

Keywords:  color vision; contrast gain control; cross-orientation masking; dichoptic; isoluminance; psychophysics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23716122     DOI: 10.1167/13.6.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  5 in total

1.  Binocular combination of second-order stimuli.

Authors:  Jiawei Zhou; Rong Liu; Yifeng Zhou; Robert F Hess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Orientation tuning of binocular summation: a comparison of colour to achromatic contrast.

Authors:  Mina Gheiratmand; Avital S Cherniawsky; Kathy T Mullen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The Whole is Other Than the Sum: Perceived Contrast Summation Within Color and Luminance Plaids.

Authors:  Avital S Cherniawsky; Kathy T Mullen
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-10-21

4.  Orientation tuning in human colour vision at detection threshold.

Authors:  Mina Gheiratmand; Kathy T Mullen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Contrast normalization in colour vision: the effect of luminance contrast on colour contrast detection.

Authors:  Kathy T Mullen; Yeon Jin Kim; Mina Gheiratmand
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.